PS3, PS4, Xbox 360.... Uh oh wait. What about the next xbox, please don't tell me this will be released and then the not able to be on next xbox. That would kill almost 1/2 the market for this game. Why does bungie make these choices?
@1nUrF4c3 @ApolloAegis That is what a lot of people replied to me when gs posted the article on Online only and possible requiring Kinect. However Microsoft would be the one to make the move into the new technology even if it is forced because they aren't having finacial issues. In fact outside of release date of console or lauch products according to fidelity (stock) xbox products only make up 4% of their income so a loss wouldn't destroy them. And the rumor is they are eventually trying for a Virtual Reality type of deal, full game immersion. (similar seen to the eye recognition technology in PS3 controllers) Why? Because all consoles need that element as technology is growing faster each day and consoles can't be upgraded as easy as PCs. The result being we won't be able to keep up and new consoles would have to role out sooner and sooner to keep up. This immersion element couldn't be copied by computers. I mean this new console being released now came about because PC games were simply having more features (example BF3 server size or PS3 having issues with TESV:Skyrim DLCs). Both systems in turn are trying to become more computer like in a couple ways and are using their names to form contracts like with Netflicks on xbox. However this is not going to last as parts for PCs are a more competitive and thus cheaper market.
Truth is as a Xbox gamer I am concerned for Nintendo and Sony. Because if you guys die out then consoles in turn are less competively marketed and more expensive. Gamers need to stop thinking just in terms of features and more in terms of marketing. I feel this is why so many releases were dissapointing, even (given its a pc game) criminal in case of WarZ. Because we just want features and more but don't realize these are completely depended their goal they need to sustain as a company which is making money.
If sony and microsoft are trying a different strategy to diversify their product it is extremely good. It actually gives a good reason to own both consoles possibly. I mean Nintendo tried it but failed to establish good gaming contracts dependent on their marketing to small children, bad idea in that (going off memory) the average age of a gamer is late 30s, early 40s.
@1nUrF4c3 @ApolloAegis Oh sorry, your right. that is my ADHD, What are your thoughts on these facts, do you agree with me and do what are your gaming philosophies? (Like do you prefer sticking to controller or want to see a new media attempt, that sort of thing.)
I have a question for PlayStation players and I want you to keep some facts in mind. One sony hasn't turned a profit in 4 years, watch this link if you don't believe me http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21526450 . Secondly, the new Xbox has been suspected to not have a controller and takes an entirely different design philosophy in many aspects from what has been shown here on the PS4. Third as stated in the video, the console its self is not shown. Thus, is it possible Playstation is trying a completely different market then xbox in a hit or miss marketing strategy and/or the product is not complete and will be too early released to not compete with Microsofts new xbox, trying to trap the market early. Either was it seems like a large risk for Sony. (Please take note, I am not implying one is better than the other)
@00J @ApolloAegis This choice for requiring came as soon as they likely created kinect. To keep everyone on par with the same system. The difference between us and PC is microsoft is our middle-man. Where PC gamers have no middle-man, things like steam are a choice of middle-man.
its a marketing call, just like Wii choose to have motion systems during the last console release. A marketing call based on their direction. No one is forcing you.
A reason they are doing this is there is a rumor, that the new xbox will eventually project the game around you like the virtual reality sets tried but in good quality this time.
I think every gamer needs to come to terms gaming media changing. It is no different then requiring a controller. The same is to be said with limiting games to individual customers; ultimately, it allows them to ensure a quality, standardized product and eliminates replacing damaged discs. They are improving the gaming experience in many aspects, but this obviously has draw backs of monopolizing practices. The response of us gamers, especially console gamers, should for partnerships with other gaming companies/part producers to allow us the freedoms of PC players, the ability to grow or update our system and customize our games with more in-game or console tools. The ability to customize, thus give alternate choices, provides internal competition and should lower prices instead of forcing purchases. Otherwise they result will be gamers abandoning consoles.
ApolloAegis' comments