@sealionact said:
@tormentos: Ah, how we’ve missed you.
Well, missed you is a bit strong. We’ve missed laughing at you is being a bit more accurate.
1) Dualsense is more expensive than the xsx controller.
2) DualShock was cheap because they used a 1000mah battery in the thing which drained after 4-5 hours. The gadgets were never used, and you couldn’t turn the stupid light off which was one of the reasons - along with non existent power management options - that the thing barely lasted a gaming session.
3) If you are saying that including rechargeables with the xsx controller won’t raise the price, then why are rechargeables more expensive than non-rechargeables?
4) Keeping AAs to power the controller is the standard option. 30 hours of gaming versus 5-6 hours on the Dualsense, which is so poorly designed that the controller turns off one feature (haptics) when you use another (microphone) so that you can actually hear what you’re trying to say! Genius.
Best part of that is Sony are disabling features that make the Dualsense unique, but they also disable the ability to use the DualShock with ps5 games....because they insist you should play those games with the features that they are disabling on the Dualsense!
Putting a pair of rechargeable AAs in is another option.
Putting a battery pack is yet another option.
Even just plugging the cable in would be another option, except that would be more like what ps owners face.
So yes, there’s options on an Xbox.....but please, keep raging.
We all need a good laugh these days.
1-The dual sense is 10 dollars more, the charge and play kit is $20 do the math.
By the way the DS4 is the same price as the xbox one controller again, so was the DS3 and the xbox 360 controller.
The series X is a new console with not even 4 months on the market so is the PS5 the great majority are DS4 and yeah those cost the same while the xbox one has lees hardware features.
2-The argument here is batteries not if the functions were use or which they were by the way.
Fact is the DS4 has light,speaker,touch pad,motion and built in battery all of those 5 are not on xbox one controller how come the xbox one controller cost the same yet has many less features oh wait i forgot the media button which also the xbox one controller lack.
Now tell me MS can't freaking built in a battery in fact a nice one with all that shit sony has on its controller that add to the cost and that MS is saving because it doesn't have them?
3-It will not raise the price because MS already charged the same price Sony was charging for its controller yet MS controller lacked not 1 but 5 hardware features the PS4 had on its controller, this is simple MS is making a bigger profit on its controllers than sony is, this is quite simple everything you add on a controller cost money, so if you don't have touch pad, light, motion, speaker, and battery that controller cost much less to manufacture.
So adding a pair of batteries would only eat into MS profits, but would not mean that you have to pay more because their controller already has many features missing that the competition controller has.
4-The dual sense doesn't last from 5 to 6 hours, in fact it can last up to 12.
https://www.psu.com/news/ps5-dualsense-battery-life-can-last-up-to-13-hours-but-use-of-haptic-feedback-and-adaptive-triggers-can-shorten-it-significantly/
The standard option is 30 hours, after that freaking get your wallet and buy more, fact is the PS5 one runs out but can be recharge and last years the ones that come standard on xbox las 30 hours.
Basic match 5 hours per day @ X 365 days = 1825 hours per year multiply by just 5 years 9,125 hours of gameplay vs the 30 shitty hours that you get from your standard batteries that come built in.
9,125 divided by 30 = 304.16 So you would need 304 regular pack of batteries to match what you can get of charge on a DS controller daily for 5 years.
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Duracell-Coppertop-AA-Battery-Long-Lasting-Double-A-Batteries-8-Pack/870861
You would need 38 package of this to match it, oh remember i limit the play hours only to 5 hours, which is a joke since we can charge the controller and play 5 hours more making it 10 hours per day and basically doubling the number which mean you need even more regular batteries.
So you see the DS battery may seem shitty until you compare it to how much it would save you, charging in 7 hours or charging in 30 still is charging, but all this shit is irrelevant because MS doesn't freaking have to pack a damn shitty battery like the PS4 controller, it can be better so the point here is simple you are been nickel and dime for 3 generations on a row because MS did a deal with Duracell and because they sell you rechargeable batteries.
Your only OPTION is paying enjoy the xbox 10 in 2050 with AA batteries.😂
The only rekt he did was to him self, mounting a barrage of shitty excuses doesn't eliminate the point, you can cry all you want about the DS it has more features and cost less than the xbox controller when you factor in battery.
Having AA as option is not a valid reason for MS a multi billion dollar company to skip including a pair of rechargeable one you are been milk for batteries and you love it.
@i_p_daily said:
Its funny 1 set of AA batteries in an Xbox controller last longer than Sony's games lol.
Oh and OP, most of the posts in here are from your boy tormy having his usual meltdown 🤣🤣🤣
Yet that sony game still better score and sell more than MS long ass game multiplayer included as well..🤣🤣🤣
Log in to comment