Would you really be 100% happy if the PS3 dies?

I mean Dreamcast dead.

All three consoles will be awesome.

I would hate to see anyone of them die. :(

It just means less games to play.
Nteks

Despite all the ignorance being displayed in this thread...

PS saved the gaming industry from Nintendo's backwards thinking and third party developer suffocating ways.

PS2 is hands down one of the best gaming consoles ever made. Its library is right up there with the SNES.

PS3 is making alot of the mistakes the N64 made when it was released. The difference though is that unlike Nintendo, Sony isn't losing all of its third party support. (FF VII was lost on the N64, XIII is still set to be released on the PS3.)

Alot of folks want to take the PS3's faults and forget all the good Sony has done but its not going to happen. Sony mainstreamed gaming more then the Wii ever will. 100 million consoles is nothing to sneeze at and will not likely ever be matched by the competition.

With that said, you need all three to exist so that they can continue to give consumers the best value. Anything else is just blind ignorance.

Despite all the ignorance being displayed in this thread...

PS saved the gaming industry from Nintendo's backwards thinking and third party developer suffocating ways.

PS2 is hands down one of the best gaming consoles ever made. Its library is right up there with the SNES.

PS3 is making alot of the mistakes the N64 made when it was released. The difference though is that unlike Nintendo, Sony isn't losing all of its third party support. (FF VII was lost on the N64, XIII is still set to be released on the PS3.)

Alot of folks want to take the PS3's faults and forget all the good Sony has done but its not going to happen. Sony mainstreamed gaming more then the Wii ever will. 100 million consoles is nothing to sneeze at and will not likely never be matched by the competition.

With that said, you need all three to exist so that they can continue to give consumers the best value. Anything else is just blind ignorance.

Bread_or_Decide

i wont be happy, we need the competition to keep these guys on their toes, you could imagine the amount of crap we would get if there was just one console.tacomh

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Despite all the ignorance being displayed in this thread...

PS saved the gaming industry from Nintendo's backwards thinking and third party developer suffocating ways.

PS2 is hands down one of the best gaming consoles ever made. Its library is right up there with the SNES.

PS3 is making alot of the mistakes the N64 made when it was released. The difference though is that unlike Nintendo, Sony isn't losing all of its third party support. (FF VII was lost on the N64, XIII is still set to be released on the PS3.)

Alot of folks want to take the PS3's faults and forget all the good Sony has done but its not going to happen. Sony mainstreamed gaming more then the Wii ever will. 100 million consoles is nothing to sneeze at and will not likely never be matched by the competition.

With that said, you need all three to exist so that they can continue to give consumers the best value. Anything else is just blind ignorance.

6icks_tea_4hoar

Now sony is the company being arrogant.

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Despite all the ignorance being displayed in this thread...

PS saved the gaming industry from Nintendo's backwards thinking and third party developer suffocating ways.

PS2 is hands down one of the best gaming consoles ever made. Its library is right up there with the SNES.

PS3 is making alot of the mistakes the N64 made when it was released. The difference though is that unlike Nintendo, Sony isn't losing all of its third party support. (FF VII was lost on the N64, XIII is still set to be released on the PS3.)

Alot of folks want to take the PS3's faults and forget all the good Sony has done but its not going to happen. Sony mainstreamed gaming more then the Wii ever will. 100 million consoles is nothing to sneeze at and will not likely never be matched by the competition.

With that said, you need all three to exist so that they can continue to give consumers the best value. Anything else is just blind ignorance.

6icks_tea_4hoar

As someone who ran out on day one and bought an N64 and played Mario 64 until my fingers bled, yes Nintendo was pretty much everything Sony is now. Arrogant, stubborn, and foolish.

To deny that is to know nothing of gaming history.

i wont be happy, we need the competition to keep these guys on their toes, you could imagine the amount of crap we would get if there was just one console.tacomh

I certainly would not. If SONY dropped from the console race-- which is highly unlikely-- it would be devastating to the video game industry. We aren't talking small company SEGA, we're talking big buisness SONY. SONY has contributed alot to video games and to see them perish would be truly sad. There would be tons of great games that would never be played if that happened. This goes for all the big guys in the industry, not just SONY.DA_B0MB

[QUOTE="6icks_tea_4hoar"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Despite all the ignorance being displayed in this thread...

PS saved the gaming industry from Nintendo's backwards thinking and third party developer suffocating ways.

PS2 is hands down one of the best gaming consoles ever made. Its library is right up there with the SNES.

PS3 is making alot of the mistakes the N64 made when it was released. The difference though is that unlike Nintendo, Sony isn't losing all of its third party support. (FF VII was lost on the N64, XIII is still set to be released on the PS3.)

Alot of folks want to take the PS3's faults and forget all the good Sony has done but its not going to happen. Sony mainstreamed gaming more then the Wii ever will. 100 million consoles is nothing to sneeze at and will not likely never be matched by the competition.

With that said, you need all three to exist so that they can continue to give consumers the best value. Anything else is just blind ignorance.

BuryMe

Now sony is the company being arrogant.

Backwards = Cartridge.

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Despite all the ignorance being displayed in this thread...

PS saved the gaming industry from Nintendo's backwards thinking and third party developer suffocating ways.

PS2 is hands down one of the best gaming consoles ever made. Its library is right up there with the SNES.

PS3 is making alot of the mistakes the N64 made when it was released. The difference though is that unlike Nintendo, Sony isn't losing all of its third party support. (FF VII was lost on the N64, XIII is still set to be released on the PS3.)

Alot of folks want to take the PS3's faults and forget all the good Sony has done but its not going to happen. Sony mainstreamed gaming more then the Wii ever will. 100 million consoles is nothing to sneeze at and will not likely never be matched by the competition.

With that said, you need all three to exist so that they can continue to give consumers the best value. Anything else is just blind ignorance.

6icks_tea_4hoar

Uh, No. Why would you say that?

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="MentatAssassin"]

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]I think if the dreamcast would have succeeded , then the xbox probably would have died.There is room for Nintendo and Sony for sure , and only one other pretender to the throne.


MentatAssassin

At this point M$ is more like the long lost heir to the throne rather than a "pretender". If anything, Sony would be that insane old king who flung himself off the ledge at the end of LOTR III.:P

My bad. I guess I shoulda watched it more than once.

No and I have never alurred to that, I would be 100% happy if sony would get off their high horse, and stop touting a system that is obviously not the most powerful as the most powerful. I would be 100% happy if sony would fire ken and kaz and all the other stupid remarking execs. I would be 100% happy if the ps3 wasn't 600 dollars.WilliamRLBaker

The system is the most powerful why is this even up for debate .

Yes sony let me down this gen :(SAGE_OF_FIRE

If the Playstaion 3 dies the gaming industry would go into a massive slump.  Sony is the lead console maker and if it dies that just means less good games and less compettiton.  Anyone who wishes it dies is simply angry that there poor and cant afford a PS3. Billyhyw

[QUOTE="Billyhyw"]If the Playstaion 3 dies the gaming industry would go into a massive slump.  Sony is the lead console maker and if it dies that just means less good games and less compettiton.  Anyone who wishes it dies is simply angry that there poor and cant afford a PS3. Nerkcon

I didnt make the thread .  I was simply listing several good advantages of consoles over pc if you see price as the only advantage thats your problem.

I like the excluisves I get with consoles better that is the single most important factor for me and thats all there is to it.

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Billyhyw"]If the Playstaion 3 dies the gaming industry would go into a massive slump.  Sony is the lead console maker and if it dies that just means less good games and less compettiton.  Anyone who wishes it dies is simply angry that there poor and cant afford a PS3. Billyhyw

I didnt make the thread .

[QUOTE="Billyhyw"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Billyhyw"]If the Playstaion 3 dies the gaming industry would go into a massive slump.  Sony is the lead console maker and if it dies that just means less good games and less compettiton.  Anyone who wishes it dies is simply angry that there poor and cant afford a PS3. Nerkcon

I didnt make the thread .

So you want the PS3 to die because you can get a 360 and wii? What if the Wii doesnt appeal to me at all and I think its a gimmick and the biggest rip off in gaming history? Why do you ask?  Well Nintendo is the only console maker that makes money on each system sold.  While the 360 launched with a price of 400$ it cost Microsoft 575$ to make each console.  And as overpriced as the PS3 may be at 600$ it cost Sony 850$ to make each PS3.  Now the Wii cost Nintendo 160$ to make yet they sell it for 250$? 

And why is it that half the games dont even look as good as gamecube games and there best looking game( Zelda TP) looks exactly like the Gamecube version.  Serisously I want you to think during all the times you played a console and see if you can recall once when a console released 5 years after its older model had problems matching it in graphical ability. I know Nintendo gives this big speech about how they want to change gaming with the Wii remote the fact is the only reason they went with the Wii remote is so they wouldnt have to spend as much money to make powerful hardware.  And the only reason Wii360 was endorced by Microsoft and Nintendo is because Sony holds more marketshare then both of them combined.

No.  We need the PS3 around cuz the Wii will inevitably catch and pass the 360 in sales.  Lems will need somebody to kick, and the Sonyfans are lining up nicely.jaysin1414

LOL ill be surprised if the Wii makes it past 2008.  The gimmic will run up quick and as more games come out for the PS3 and 360 i will see the Wii dead last.

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Billyhyw"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Billyhyw"]If the Playstaion 3 dies the gaming industry would go into a massive slump.  Sony is the lead console maker and if it dies that just means less good games and less compettiton.  Anyone who wishes it dies is simply angry that there poor and cant afford a PS3. Billyhyw

I didnt make the thread .

So you want the PS3 to die because you can get a 360 and wii? What if the Wii doesnt appeal to me at all and I think its a gimmick and the biggest rip off in gaming history? Why do you ask?  Well Nintendo is the only console maker that makes money on each system sold.  While the 360 launched with a price of 400$ it cost Microsoft 575$ to make each console.  And as overpriced as the PS3 may be at 600$ it cost Sony 850$ to make each PS3.  Now the Wii cost Nintendo 160$ to make yet they sell it for 250$? 

And why is it that half the games dont even look as good as gamecube games and there best looking game( Zelda TP) looks exactly like the Gamecube version.  Serisously I want you to think during all the times you played a console and see if you can recall once when a console released 5 years after its older model had problems matching it in graphical ability. I know Nintendo gives this big speech about how they want to change gaming with the Wii remote the fact is the only reason they went with the Wii remote is so they wouldnt have to spend as much money to make powerful hardware.  And the only reason Wii360 was endorced by Microsoft and Nintendo is because Sony holds more marketshare then both of them combined.

Dreamcast didn't have any games.I mean come'on Sega never wins. Shu76

[QUOTE="Billyhyw"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Billyhyw"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Billyhyw"]If the Playstaion 3 dies the gaming industry would go into a massive slump.  Sony is the lead console maker and if it dies that just means less good games and less compettiton.  Anyone who wishes it dies is simply angry that there poor and cant afford a PS3. Nerkcon

I didnt make the thread .

So you want the PS3 to die because you can get a 360 and wii? What if the Wii doesnt appeal to me at all and I think its a gimmick and the biggest rip off in gaming history? Why do you ask?  Well Nintendo is the only console maker that makes money on each system sold.  While the 360 launched with a price of 400$ it cost Microsoft 575$ to make each console.  And as overpriced as the PS3 may be at 600$ it cost Sony 850$ to make each PS3.  Now the Wii cost Nintendo 160$ to make yet they sell it for 250$? 

And why is it that half the games dont even look as good as gamecube games and there best looking game( Zelda TP) looks exactly like the Gamecube version.  Serisously I want you to think during all the times you played a console and see if you can recall once when a console released 5 years after its older model had problems matching it in graphical ability. I know Nintendo gives this big speech about how they want to change gaming with the Wii remote the fact is the only reason they went with the Wii remote is so they wouldnt have to spend as much money to make powerful hardware.  And the only reason Wii360 was endorced by Microsoft and Nintendo is because Sony holds more marketshare then both of them combined.

Why dont you come up with some post for yourself other then crappy two word comments and quotes from other people how is what your saying even relevent if you cant even make up your own opionions .  I wasnt even criticzing you in my post so stop crying.

[QUOTE="Shu76"]Dreamcast didn't have any games.I mean come'on Sega never wins. rexoverbey

Errr who woudl argue Genesis beat the SNES.

It would be good for the industry. One console. Competition between software houses. Better games. Less bogus hype and disappointment.CarlosPontinas