Would you like to see third person RE games continue?

@the_master_race: This is a design choice I would say(turning around slowly in fps view), and in Outlast you have the "look behind you as you run mechanic". They can make it easier for you to look behind you if they wanted to in an fps, when I was playing RE7 I was disappointed you could not do that, because I got used to this mechanic from Silent Hill Downpour and Outlast.

It's always something that bothered me a little, not too much but because in real life it takes an instant to look behind you, and this instinct often doesn't translate well in horror games. It's OK I got used to it, I know they made that quick 180 degree turn around move in 3rd person games at some point, that helps, and I do my best to try to play the game as it was intended to. But that's just my nature, when I play a horror games with headphones, I often want to look behind me and I don't like things sneaking up behind me, so I'm constantly turning around lol

Absolutely not, I havent liked any of them.

Yes , P.T is a demo but it inspired a lot of developers one good example is Team17 and their upcoming projects Allison Road ,what I said is mostly based on my personal experience and I'm not trying to say that those games I mentioned have better gameplay , between all Resident Evil games I played none of them scared me a bit but during my time with RE7 I jolted few times and I think it could've been far better if had a PSVR on

No. My imagination runs more wild when the game is first-person because I can actually pretend it's me in the game. Kinda hard to do in third-person because I can see the character.

It might be good to do what Bethesda did which is provide both perspectives and seamlessly switch between them.

I'd rather see more traditional style RE games like the REmake, as opposed to action games.

It did feel like an uncommitted effort. Also personally not a fan of episodic releases in games. Would rather it comes as a complete product (referring to R2). I'm currently playing RE7, which I'm enjoying and knowing the Resident Evil 2 remake is in the works (and possibly using the RE engine) gives me hope.

Yea, ignored Rev2 until it was done, to be fair there was quite abit of content there in the end. Think it was probably the longest RE game? Or maybe I was just really shit and dying alot, who knows.

Rev2 wasn't so much filler, just playing that little girl was so boring.

& they made Claire Redfield ugly..what the hell is with the nose????...nose job went wrong? :P

Eh, wasn't too fussed about the face redesign.

Didn't much like the creature designs in Rev2, bit shitty. The designs in Rev1 with the lungworm heads and the way they shambled around, working against the steely aesthetic of the ship was great. The random bursts of speed in Inferno put you on edge.

Yes, I prefer 3rd person BUT I want them more like REmake or, at the very least like RE4. I dont want more action over horror like RE5 onwards. RE4 had more action, sure, but the survival horror aspects were still there

@Vatusus: no it was not there with re4 also re4 has one of the worst plots then any other game peroid re4 is nothing but a joke to the series

All Resident Evil games are B-movies.

1-3 = "Of The Dead"

4 = "Evil Dead" i.e. ho, ho, dis weally funny

RE died with 4. 7 Was just a gimmick short easy game for the new casual generation.

Yes, it was. You still played alone for the most part of the game, you still had to manage your resources carefully, the ammo was still scarce and who gives a sh*t about plot in RE? All RE plots are terrible. The difference is, RE knows its plot is a joke and plays along with.

reboot the series with a much more clearer narrative that makes sense.

Yes. As long as its RE4-style over-the-shoulder camera, not the dated static cameras of RE1-3.