@ronvalencia said:
That's bullshit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_technical_specifications#List_of_revisions
Codename | CPU | GPU | eDRAM | HDMI | Power Supply | In Production | Date Released | Notes |
---|
Xenon | 90 nm | 90 nm | 90 nm | No | 203 W | No | November 2005 | Original release. Console power consumption 198 W. |
Zephyr | 90 nm | 90 nm | 90 nm | Yes | 203 W | No | April 2007 | Introduced HDMI port. Improved GPU heatsink. |
Falcon | 65 nm | 80 nm | 80 nm | Yes | 175 W | No | September 2007 | Introduced 65 nm CPU, 80 nm GPU and 80 nm eDRAM.[32] Power consumption lowered. Console power consumption 12V 14.2A or 170.4 W. |
Opus | 65 nm | 90 nm | 80 nm | No | 175 W | No | July 2008 | Available as a replacement for Xenon motherboards which have been sent in to Microsoft tech repair centers. Console power consumption 170.4 W. |
Jasper | 65 nm | 65 nm | 80 nm | Yes | 150 W | No | September 2008 | Introduced 65 nm GPU. Introduced on-board flash-based memory. Further reduced power consumption. Console power consumption 145.2 W. |
Kronos (Jasper v2) | 65 nm | 65 nm | 65 nm | Yes | 150 W | No | September 2009 | Introduced 65 nm eDRAM. Introduced new RF-module, new style GPU Kronos revision. Eliminated the E74 problem from earlier jasper models. |
Trinity | 45 nm (combined chip) | Yes | 135 W | No | June 2010 | Motherboard redesign used in the Xbox 360 Slim. Two versions: one with 4 GB on-board storage, one without. Console power consumption 130W. |
Corona | 45 nm (combined chip) | Yes | 115 W | No | August 2011 | No more HANA chip. Includes both Xbox 360 Slim and E versions. |
Winchester | 45 nm (combined chip) | Yes | 115 W | No | August 2014 | Corona motherboard revision named Winchester motherboard, patches Reset Glitch Hack. Released with 500GB console bundles |
Each revision reduces RROD incidents.
FY2008, the bleed was stopped.
The bleed didn't stop in 2008 you freaking MORON,you see that HUGE write off in 2007? yeah that is the 1.1 billion they set ASIDE + losses of the hardware itself,the writes off was just 1 year,they separated the 1+ billion for repair in 2007 on 2008 there wasn't another write off because the money they set aside in 2007 should cover the whole RROD for years yo come ass.
You simply don't know shit about what you are arguing,MS didn't set aside 1 billion each year for RROD they set 1+ billion on 2007 and that was suppose to cover all RROD and future ones.
RROD failure didn't stop in 2008 ass,in fact my last 360 was one of the very last batch done in 2010 before the Slime model and RROD years ago.
RROD was a problem of the fat 360 model,by the way RROD until 2008 didn't cover E74 error which mean that if your console had an E74 error it wasn't cover by the 3 year extended warranty only 3 red rings were cover.
Microsoft has extended the three year "Red Ring of Death" warranty cover it offered to Xbox 360 owners to cover a new fault - the E74 fault.
Here's Microsoft knowledge base entry on the change to the warranty:
While the majority of Xbox 360 owners continue to have a great experience with their console, we are aware that a very small percentage of our customers have reported receiving an error that displays “E74” on their screen. After investigating the issue, we have determined that the E74 error message can indicate the general hardware failure that is associated with three flashing red lights error on the console. As a result, we have decided to cover repairs related to the E74 error message under our three-year warranty program for certain general hardware failures that was announced in July 2007. We have already made improvements to the console that will reduce the likelihood of an occurrence of this issue. Detailed information related to the Xbox 360 warranty and resources for those who require repair can be found at www.xbox.com/support
https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-extends-xbox-360-red-ring-of-death-warranty-to-cover-e74-error/
BUt but but the bleed stopped in 2008..Hahahahaaa
The bleed never stopped until the slim model arrived.
MS included E74 on april 2009 that was one of the failure the machine also had but that MS didn't start covering until 2009.
So yeah stop the bullshit and your damage control,this is a topic i have argue allot so yeah i know a thing or 2 about it,you apparently don't.
Basically you assume that because MS didn't report a loss in 2008 that somehow means the problem stopped,when in reality what happen is that MS already separated the money in 2007 for all RROD repairs,so going forward no money would show up as loss,because all was taken care off,MS didn't take money for RROD year by year.
What you see there is the normal time frame it took the 360 to turn a profit it self,which was normal for those platforms which were sold at a loss back then.
In fact if MS would have not write off that billion+ on 2007 the graph would show the 360 much closer to turning a profit than in 2006.
@ronvalencia said:
https://support.xbox.com/en-BZ/xbox-360/repair/warranty-faq
The warranties are:
- Xbox 360 console: One year
- Xbox 360 console with three flashing red lights or error E74: Three years from the console purchase date (not applicable to the Xbox 360 E console)
Taken right from Xbox's own support page with link bold and underlined.
Error E74 = red ring of death (RROD).
Hahhaahaaa NO it doesn't E74 was another error of the 360 which wasn't 3 red lights of death,MS saw it as a normal failure rather than part of the 3 rings of dead and E74 wasn't cover until April 2009 almost 2 years after the 3 year warranty took place.
You simply don't know what you are arguing.
@xhedon said:
@tgob89: you just got Wrecked dumbass. You asked for proof to what I said, proof was posted and now you are totally and endlessly phucked.
You got your but kicked the PS3 was at 85 million in 2016,so it was impossible to be at 82 millions.
And you were wrong about RROD as well lemm.
Log in to comment