Playstation 5/Xbox 4: do we already have a PC as powerful?

Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes is t safe to say that we already have PC parts that will be in PS5/Xb4?

Like if their GPU is 5-6 times more powerful it will be like a R9 295x2?

Or you doubt that it will be so weak and crappy?

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

___

And to respond to your other part, it is impossible to say where GPU power will be in however many years. Especially with Nvidia introducing their 20nm cards Pascal cards in 2016.

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

2014 PC is still more powerful than next gen Playstation 5 and Xbox 4(about 2020?)

PC gaming already has 8k gaming, meanwhile PS5 and Xbox 4 won´t even have 4K gaming 2020.

So yeah. 2014 PC gaming >>> 2020 console gaming.

Avatar image for Shielder7
Shielder7

5191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Shielder7
Member since 2006 • 5191 Posts

@R3FURBISHED said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

It better be because it's the only support they're getting.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@True_Gamer_:

What did you expect from a $399.99 console a Titan level gpu? Be happy that the PS4 came with 8GB's of GDDR5. That stuff is expensive.

The PS4 is as powerful a console could be at $399.99 in 2013 without Sony losing money on each console. I feel the PS4 offers a lot of value at $399.99, and judging by the 9 million PS4's sold worldwide it looks like a lot of people agree with me.

I mean you still can't build a $399.99 gaming rig that blows away the PS4 in terms of raw power.

The PS5 will be around 9-10x more powerful than the PS4. So, expect an 16-18 teraflop GPU.

In regards to Xbox 4, I actually don't think there will be an Xbox 4 if the XB1 ends up third this generation.

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

@True_Gamer_ said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

The virus of weak machines that cost less than the price of sale. The 360 used to rape all 2005 PCs while costing 700$ to make...And now $500 PCs own the Xbone....

Do you really think a company today would seek to sell a console at a loss? I can't see Sony or Microsoft selling a $600 console or building a $600 console -- especially with how well the $400 PS4 is being received.

Even a GPU that costs $50 more would change the entire price point of the console.

Avatar image for MuD3
MuD3

2192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By MuD3
Member since 2011 • 2192 Posts

i think consoles learned their lesson last gen with high price points. the focus for a console is not to have the best hardware.... they know as long as it's better than before people won't care, especially if it's actually affordable. the majority of console gamers don't even know what they are missing anyway and the ones who do don't care or can't afford to care.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@True_Gamer_ said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

The virus of weak machines that cost less than the price of sale. The 360 used to rape all 2005 PCs while costing 700$ to make...And now $500 PCs own the Xbone....

Xbox 360 didn't cost $700 to make. It was about $500 for the 20GB model.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife:

Yeah, because the average PC gaming rig is loaded with dual GTX 780's. A very small minority of PC gamers are playing games in 4K. It isn't the standard. I highly doubt a $399.99 PC can play games at 4K with acceptable framerates.

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

@emgesp said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

The virus of weak machines that cost less than the price of sale. The 360 used to rape all 2005 PCs while costing 700$ to make...And now $500 PCs own the Xbone....

Xbox 360 didn't cost $700 to make. It was about $500 for the 20GB model.

Indeed - $470 from the number I saw. And that was for a console that marketed at $400.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

@emgesp said:

@FreedomFreeLife:

Yeah, because the average PC gaming rig is loaded with dual GTX 780's. A very small minority of PC gamers are playing games in 4K. It isn't the standard. I highly doubt a $399.99 PC can play games at 4K with acceptable framerates.

I don't think he's talking about the "average" PC.

Avatar image for m3dude1
m3dude1

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 m3dude1
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

2014 PC is still more powerful than next gen Playstation 5 and Xbox 4(about 2020?)

PC gaming already has 8k gaming, meanwhile PS5 and Xbox 4 won´t even have 4K gaming 2020.

So yeah. 2014 PC gaming >>> 2020 console gaming.

dumb even by herm standards

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

Can't say anything about the next-generation of console hardware. I mean, people were expecting this gen to arrive in late 2012 and PC gamers were betting that the console games will look worse than the likes of BF3 or Crysis. Look where we are now.

Take a gander at this: http://neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=453264

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

@emgesp said:

@FreedomFreeLife:

Yeah, because the average PC gaming rig is loaded with dual GTX 780's. A very small minority of PC gamers are playing games in 4K. It isn't the standard. I highly doubt a $399.99 PC can play games at 4K with acceptable framerates.

avarage PC gamer for 400 dollars for PC? PC gamer uses usually at least 1000 dollar PC. For example. Go to Neogaf and 95% PC gamers PC costs over 1000 dollars.

This is standard. People are already playing 8K.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts
@FreedomFreeLife said:

@emgesp said:

@FreedomFreeLife:

Yeah, because the average PC gaming rig is loaded with dual GTX 780's. A very small minority of PC gamers are playing games in 4K. It isn't the standard. I highly doubt a $399.99 PC can play games at 4K with acceptable framerates.

avarage PC gamer for 400 dollars for PC? PC gamer uses usually at least 1000 dollar PC. For example. Go to Neogaf and 95% PC gamers PC costs over 1000 dollars.

This is standard. People are already playing 8K.

Most gaming rigs are not $1000+ dollars. The average is probably around $500-600 range. A minority of gamers don't make standards, the majority do and the majority of PC gamers aren't even maxing out games in 1080p and getting 60fps.

BTW, I'm not talking about people who only play candy crush. I mean people who buy gaming rigs to play core games.

Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts

@emgesp said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

The virus of weak machines that cost less than the price of sale. The 360 used to rape all 2005 PCs while costing 700$ to make...And now $500 PCs own the Xbone....

Xbox 360 didn't cost $700 to make. It was about $500 for the 20GB model.

Reality check:

http://www.joystiq.com/2005/12/28/xbox-360-costs-715-to-make/

Seriously do a test:

Compare a $500 PC of 2001 to the first Xbox

Now compare a $500 PC of 2005 to the 360

Then compare a $500 PC of 2013 to the Xbone

Something changed this gen?

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@True_Gamer_ said:

@emgesp said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

The virus of weak machines that cost less than the price of sale. The 360 used to rape all 2005 PCs while costing 700$ to make...And now $500 PCs own the Xbone....

Xbox 360 didn't cost $700 to make. It was about $500 for the 20GB model.

Reality check:

http://www.joystiq.com/2005/12/28/xbox-360-costs-715-to-make/

Seriously do a test:

Compare a $500 PC of 2001 to the first Xbox

Now compare a $500 PC of 2005 to the 360

Then compare a $500 PC of 2013 to the Xbone

Something changed this gen?

Reality check:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20051123214405.html


A PC in 2001 and 2005 drew a lot less wattage than a PC in 2013.

Even if Sony could afford a Titan level GPU the box would have to be about twice the size for adequate air-flow and ventilation. The reliability factor would also drop since more heat causes more issues. Designing a console is a balancing act on many levels. The PS4 is as good as it could be for the price.

Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts

Where'd who go?

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

58950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#22  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 58950 Posts

Around 97% of pc's on the market are macs.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

58950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#25  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 58950 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:

DISCLAIMER: As of today, we do NOT have PC's as graphically capable as the PS5 would likely be.

Why? Well we simply don't have GPU's with as advanced feature set as what PS5 will have. Shader model, 6 or 7 is expected.

We may well have the raw power of a PS5 GPU with dual GPU's and SLI set ups, but there will be new rendering tech in silicon form in the PS5 GPU that GPU's today don't have. Just like hardware tessellation in DX11 GPU's don't exist in PS3/360.

eg. An 8800 GTX quad SLI set up has as much or more raw power as the PS4 GPU. But try running any DX11 features on that set up. Won't work because it's missing silicon.

CPU power? Well I imagine the $1000 i7's today are more powerful than the PS5 CPU by a large margin already. Consoles don't need such CPU power. Nor do PC gamers quite frankly. Remember, PC's are not just gaming machines.

My friend, this is the last generation of consoles, it will simply become a steam like service.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

@R3FURBISHED said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

And total lack of 3rd party and weak console.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21064 Posts

It'll probably be more like a GTX 780, which will be pretty midrange in 3-4 generations from now. If they really want next gen to feel next gen, they're going to have to go with current high end hardware like they did in the 7th generation.

GTX 480 performs better than a PS4, but the main problem might be the PS4's CPU bottlenecking a midrange GPU.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

it will be one of the entry level next-gen graphics guards

Avatar image for Evo_nine
Evo_nine

2224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By Evo_nine
Member since 2012 • 2224 Posts

Consoles cannot compete with PC's as they have to be gimped down for the common peasant.

Days of the powerful expensive consoles are gone because the peasants cant afford them.

Lucky the xbox atleast has some great exclusives to make up its short comings. As far as the delaystation goes.....2016 might be a good year?

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:

DISCLAIMER: As of today, we do NOT have PC's as graphically capable as the PS5 would likely be.

Why? Well we simply don't have GPU's with as advanced feature set as what PS5 will have. Shader model, 6 or 7 is expected.

We may well have the raw power of a PS5 GPU with dual GPU's and SLI set ups, but there will be new rendering tech in silicon form in the PS5 GPU that GPU's today don't have. Just like hardware tessellation in DX11 GPU's don't exist in PS3/360.

eg. An 8800 GTX quad SLI set up has as much or more raw power as the PS4 GPU. But try running any DX11 features on that set up. Won't work because it's missing silicon.

CPU power? Well I imagine the $1000 i7's today are more powerful than the PS5 CPU by a large margin already. Consoles don't need such CPU power. Nor do PC gamers quite frankly. Remember, PC's are not just gaming machines.

How do you know that the PS5 won't just be a incremental update to whats in the PS4?

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

I doubt it, not this early into the gen, although i had a pc stronger than current consoles 2-3 years ago.

Avatar image for ShepardCommandr
ShepardCommandr

4939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 ShepardCommandr
Member since 2013 • 4939 Posts

Probably especially now with the 800 series coming.

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

By the time the next gen consoles come out there will be new or much better architectures. New manufacturing process that allows the creation of more powerful chips while cheaper. The Cloud Computing might become something useful for games. Better Game Engines. etc.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:
@clyde46 said:

@scottpsfan14 said:

DISCLAIMER: As of today, we do NOT have PC's as graphically capable as the PS5 would likely be.

Why? Well we simply don't have GPU's with as advanced feature set as what PS5 will have. Shader model, 6 or 7 is expected.

We may well have the raw power of a PS5 GPU with dual GPU's and SLI set ups, but there will be new rendering tech in silicon form in the PS5 GPU that GPU's today don't have. Just like hardware tessellation in DX11 GPU's don't exist in PS3/360.

eg. An 8800 GTX quad SLI set up has as much or more raw power as the PS4 GPU. But try running any DX11 features on that set up. Won't work because it's missing silicon.

CPU power? Well I imagine the $1000 i7's today are more powerful than the PS5 CPU by a large margin already. Consoles don't need such CPU power. Nor do PC gamers quite frankly. Remember, PC's are not just gaming machines.

How do you know that the PS5 won't just be a incremental update to whats in the PS4?

Assuming the PS5 is a set of hardware and not a streaming device, if they release yet another DX11/shadermodel 5 GPU in a next gen console, it would be the first time in history. If it's released 5 or more years from now of course (which is most likely). Why? Do you expect PS5 to be a mere little upgrade? Do you even understand why new consoles are released in the first place? Apart from money? It's because they want to enhance graphics and experiences across the gaming industry. So PS4 being a lot more powerful than PS3 means developers can work to a new lowest common denominator. See Batman AK, or AC Unity compared to their last gen counterparts for reference. PS5 will do the same if streaming doesn't take over.

Fact is, you were just looking for someone to debunk on your daily SW hunt. Are you bored clyde? What else do you seriously have to add?

You find me out, yes I am bored and I'm putting off tidying my room. My assumption is that now that consoles are using PC hardware I see no incentive to cram the latest tech in there. All I forsee at the current moment in time is a better CPU/GPU and more RAM. Given that most people at the start of this gen are eating up these "HD remakes", we've seen less new games. I'm hoping that as this gen kicks off we will start to see these HD remakes die off.

Avatar image for Solid_Max13
Solid_Max13

3596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#38 Solid_Max13
Member since 2006 • 3596 Posts

Wouldn't they call the next Xbox, Xbox Two?

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

@MuD3 said:

i think consoles learned their lesson last gen with high price points. the focus for a console is not to have the best hardware.... they know as long as it's better than before people won't care, especially if it's actually affordable. the majority of console gamers don't even know what they are missing anyway and the ones who do don't care or can't afford to care.

yeah that makes sense. And then the fact that Triple A budgets are getting higher and higher and there are things like "artists" costs that never go down, so budgets will only keep going higher and higher the farther that graphics are pushed. More detail needs more people/time no matter the technology that is used.

have fun with your football manager, nude mods and crappy f2p scams though.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@Gue1 said:

@MuD3 said:

i think consoles learned their lesson last gen with high price points. the focus for a console is not to have the best hardware.... they know as long as it's better than before people won't care, especially if it's actually affordable. the majority of console gamers don't even know what they are missing anyway and the ones who do don't care or can't afford to care.

yeah that makes sense. And then the fact that Triple A budgets keep going higher and higher and there are things like "artists" costs that never go down, so budgets will only get higher and higher the farther that graphics are pushed.

Which means either game prices go up or we get more content cut to sell back as DLC.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

Who is "we"? the 90-95% on steam with crappy PC or the rest few % with latest hardware?

Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes is t safe to say that we already have PC parts that will be in PS5/Xb4?

Like if their GPU is 5-6 times more powerful it will be like a R9 295x2?

Or you doubt that it will be so weak and crappy?

Well, I guess we can put a bunch of stuff on those consoles and sell them for $600 then have people not buy the consoles like what happened to the PS3 and blu-ray.

@scottpsfan14: please stop making up stuff that would be on the "PS5" if that even came out. What do you know about console making that makes you so sure it would even have that stuff to begin with?

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#45 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts

A decade ago, the ceiling of consumer computing power was very limited. It was possible to build something exceptionally powerful back then, but you'd usually have to start digging into server-grade hardware.

Nowadays? You can build something very powerful from consumer components. Further, as long as you are willing to spend, you can create an absolute monster from simply acquiring more of those same consumer components in greater than sane quantities.

Avatar image for granddogg
granddogg

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 granddogg
Member since 2006 • 731 Posts

why do people always say you cant match a ps4 price on pc why would somebody want to if you want a cheap gaming pc get a ps4/xbone..

Avatar image for miiiiv
miiiiv

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#47  Edited By miiiiv
Member since 2013 • 943 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:

DISCLAIMER: As of today, we do NOT have PC's as graphically capable as the PS5 would likely be.

Why? Well we simply don't have GPU's with as advanced feature set as what PS5 will have. Shader model, 6 or 7 is expected.

We may well have the raw power of a PS5 GPU with dual GPU's and SLI set ups, but there will be new rendering tech in silicon form in the PS5 GPU that GPU's today don't have. Just like hardware tessellation in DX11 GPU's don't exist in PS3/360.

eg. An 8800 GTX quad SLI set up has as much or more raw power as the PS4 GPU. But try running any DX11 features on that set up. Won't work because it's missing silicon.

CPU power? Well I imagine the $1000 i7's today are more powerful than the PS5 CPU by a large margin already. Consoles don't need such CPU power. Nor do PC gamers quite frankly. Remember, PC's are not just gaming machines.

While I pretty much agree with your post, I'm not sure that 8800gtx in quad sli has more raw power than the ps4 gpu.

@emgesp said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

@emgesp said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

@True_Gamer_ said:

Judging by the current Nintendo virus that has infected both Sony and MS with their weak ass boxes

"Nintendo virus" what virus would that be? The virus of spectacular first party support?

The virus of weak machines that cost less than the price of sale. The 360 used to rape all 2005 PCs while costing 700$ to make...And now $500 PCs own the Xbone....

Xbox 360 didn't cost $700 to make. It was about $500 for the 20GB model.

Reality check:

http://www.joystiq.com/2005/12/28/xbox-360-costs-715-to-make/

Seriously do a test:

Compare a $500 PC of 2001 to the first Xbox

Now compare a $500 PC of 2005 to the 360

Then compare a $500 PC of 2013 to the Xbone

Something changed this gen?

Reality check:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20051123214405.html

A PC in 2001 and 2005 drew a lot less wattage than a PC in 2013.

Even if Sony could afford a Titan level GPU the box would have to be about twice the size for adequate air-flow and ventilation. The reliability factor would also drop since more heat causes more issues. Designing a console is a balancing act on many levels. The PS4 is as good as it could be for the price.

The never ending trend of ever increasing wattage must soon come to a halt. All that heat has to be lead away and regardless of method it ends up in the surrounding air and can easily warm up a smaller room. The next gen consoles (if there will be another gen that is) will probably stay under 200 watts like most consoles do and it is the game consoles biggest limiting factor compared to pcs.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@emgesp said:

@FreedomFreeLife:

Yeah, because the average PC gaming rig is loaded with dual GTX 780's. A very small minority of PC gamers are playing games in 4K. It isn't the standard. I highly doubt a $399.99 PC can play games at 4K with acceptable framerates.

avarage PC gamer for 400 dollars for PC? PC gamer uses usually at least 1000 dollar PC. For example. Go to Neogaf and 95% PC gamers PC costs over 1000 dollars.

This is standard. People are already playing 8K.

They don't really represent the actual average gamer.

@uninspiredcup said:

Around 97% of pc's on the market are macs.

Nope.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50  Edited By Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60713 Posts

I buy consoles for exclusives, so I dont care what they have in hardware. Consoles will continue to have better graphics than the gen before and by golly that's ok with me.