I'm not making a big thing about this. I'm not saying Gamespot fails at reviews, or that we should move to gamerankings instead; in fact i'm completely against that idea.
My only complaint is that Jeff, more than any reviewer on any other site, seems to mess things up at a far greater rate than is acceptable. You're never going to agree with every review. You're always going to think one reviewer has been too harsh, or too generous with their scores. It happens.
But it happens to Jeff with practically every review he writes. Twilight Princess? He messed that up big time. He went overboard with Gears of War. He went flat-out insane with Tony Hawk's.
He just cant get it right. I realise it's no big deal; but imagine if you sat an exam, and 20 teachers marked it individually. 19 give you 100%, or 97 or 98. All around about full marks, give or take.
Then one, out of the whole group, only gives you 89 or 90. That's an awesome mark. Nobody would be upset with that. But why so low compared to everyone else? What's this guy seeing which nobody else is?
It's just infuriating. Why they allow a man who seems to create a storm of controversy every time he writes a review continue to critique the big games like Zelda and BioShock is just beyond me.
Log in to comment