You know whats really funny with you and all your specs? I always hear you talk about the GPU and TFLOPS of the systems and such but never mention the rest of the mahcine. So i decided to look back at some of your posts and well
http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/why-do-multiplats-look-better-on-the-360-but-ps3-e-27539170/
The ps3 has a great cpu which is the great difference,the xbox 360 has some of the best pc programers working on games for it,and the ps3 still has the best looking games,the difference is marginal but there is one.
You and many others do their best to try and compare the PS3 to PC architecture, but that's your first mistake....the PS3 is not like PC architecture and is not supposed to fully function like one, specifically the GPU.
Yes, by itself the PS3's GPU it is weaker than the XBOX 360's GPU, but the PS3 is not supposed to run on the GPU alone....it wasn't made to do that, not for best results. The PS3 was specifically made to use the GPU and the Cell Processor. That's why the Cell Processor does floating point better than any other AMD or Intel, i7 or otherwise, to date.
You keep refering to the GPU, and long story short, for the PS3, you are only talking about half of the PS3's proverbial equation.
The bottom line, if you add up the total Flops and total power that the PS3 has vs the total Flops and power that the XBOX 360 has, the PS3 shows that it can do more than the XBOX 360.
What I don't understand is, Why is anyone arguing this?
Probably because some people just don't want to admit it,is like when they say the ps3 has only 256 mb of ram,when it has 512,fact is cell fill all the holes the rsx has and them some
Credit
Log in to comment