Is Project X the first 'next gen' looking game? (New Console Graphics King?)

Finally the Sheep are back. They've been pretty quiet around here lately with how bad the Wii U has been doing in sales and the crappy launch line-up. Now that they finally announced 3d mario, mario kart, and this project x game that looks good, the sheep have come crawling out of their holes in full force. I just want to take this time to say welcome back sheep.

Finally the Sheep are back. They've been pretty quiet around here lately with how bad the Wii U has been doing in sales and the crappy launch line-up.

SonySoldier-_-

wut.

[QUOTE="SonySoldier-_-"]

Finally the Sheep are back. They've been pretty quiet around here lately with how bad the Wii U has been doing in sales and the crappy launch line-up.

DarkLink77

wut.

[QUOTE="tonitorsi"]>#Youwilldeal.

Lemme give you something to soften up the blow.

[spoiler] [/spoiler]

Now leave me alone. :P

freedomfreak

How can we tell from tiny little .gif images?

Why do people think tiny little screenshots at 1280x720 resolution, or even smaller .gif files give a good representation of what a game looks like fullscreen running straight to your screen?

Finally the Sheep are back. They've been pretty quiet around here lately with how bad the Wii U has been doing in sales and the crappy launch line-up. Now that they finally announced 3d mario, mario kart, and this project x game that looks good, the sheep have come crawling out of their holes in full force. I just want to take this time to say welcome back sheep.

SonySoldier-_-

Hello fellow Sony soldier!

Yeah, Nintendo is doing well now, but we will force them back guaranteed!

...Wii U has been doing in sales and the crappy launch line-up.

SonySoldier-_-

Wat?

The Wii U looks to have longer legs, as well, due to actually being HD this time around.

Furthermore, launch titles/lineup were actually pretty damn good.

How can we tell from tiny little .gif images?

Why do people think tiny little screenshots at 1280x720 resolution, or even smaller .gif files give a good representation of what a game looks like fullscreen running straight to your screen?

-Unreal-

Did anybody say it gave a good representation? People are extrapolating, but it looks to be pretty solid, nonetheless.

Some of the backgrounds in these gif's are 2D, from what i can see also, the grass is just 1 texture copy/pasted all over

Not that impressive

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

How can we tell from tiny little .gif images?

Why do people think tiny little screenshots at 1280x720 resolution, or even smaller .gif files give a good representation of what a game looks like fullscreen running straight to your screen?

lundy86_4

Did anybody say it gave a good representation? People are extrapolating, but it looks to be pretty solid, nonetheless.

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

How can we tell from tiny little .gif images?

Why do people think tiny little screenshots at 1280x720 resolution, or even smaller .gif files give a good representation of what a game looks like fullscreen running straight to your screen?

lundy86_4

Did anybody say it gave a good representation? People are extrapolating, but it looks to be pretty solid, nonetheless.

Pretty much. From the trailer and even the screenies it is looking pretty fine though no doubt about it. If its anything near that, then it should be a good contender for this so called "graphics king" at least as far as the current consoles go.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

How can we tell from tiny little .gif images?

Why do people think tiny little screenshots at 1280x720 resolution, or even smaller .gif files give a good representation of what a game looks like fullscreen running straight to your screen?

DarkLink77

Did anybody say it gave a good representation? People are extrapolating, but it looks to be pretty solid, nonetheless.

Exactly. Pretty common sense, I would think.

It's also nice to see a game like Xenoblade with a HD lick of paint...

[spoiler] Though i've played Chronicles on Dolphin and the Wii. [/spoiler]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Did anybody say it gave a good representation? People are extrapolating, but it looks to be pretty solid, nonetheless.

lundy86_4

Exactly. Pretty common sense, I would think.

It's also nice to see a game like Xenoblade with a HD lick of paint...

[spoiler] Though i've played Chronicles on Dolphin and the Wii. [/spoiler]

Pretty much. From the trailer and even the screenies it is looking pretty fine though no doubt about it. If its anything near that, then it should be a good contender for this so called "graphics king" at least as far as the current consoles go.

AznbkdX

\Hey, I just loved the world of Chronicles, and this looks to have a brilliant art style. I don't think it'll be the best looking game ever, but it's most definitely looking solid, from the GIFs and trailer.

Of course you did. Like a boss.DarkLink77

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

Pretty much. From the trailer and even the screenies it is looking pretty fine though no doubt about it. If its anything near that, then it should be a good contender for this so called "graphics king" at least as far as the current consoles go.

lundy86_4

\Hey, I just loved the world of Chronicles, and this looks to have a brilliant art style. I don't think it'll be the best looking game ever, but it's most definitely looking solid, from the GIFs and trailer.

Eryth Sea and Satorl Marsh especially at night and Gauir Plains gets me every time. :)

I don't automatically assume it to be the indisputed best looking game as artstyle and its large nonlinear looking world has a large role on that, but I do see it as a contender from games that have come out so far. If it can keep some of the interesting kinds of environments and atmosphere that Xenoblade had, then thats all that really matters in the long run to me.

Never noticed the sense of scale until now. Nice.

God of War 3 looks slightly better, IMO.

When the PS4 and X720 comes out... Oh boy! Wii-U crushed.

GamerwillzPS

GOW3 is linear while this is open world.The PS3 and 360 probably can't handle this game without downgrading the visuals.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

God of War 3 looks slightly better, IMO.

When the PS4 and X720 comes out... Oh boy! Wii-U crushed.

super600

GOW3 is linear while this is open world.The PS3 and 360 probably can't handle this game without downgrading the visuals.

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Shouldnt the game come out first before we start tlaking about graphic kings? wait till 2014 or 2015 lol

also i think we need a nintendo sticky

finalstar2007

So if one cow or lem acts all stupid and hypes graphics of a game before it comes out it means sheep got to act stupid too? oh makes sense :P

cows and lems flooding the board? where!? anyways i know ur excited for this game but its like being excited for versus when it first was shown and it hasnt even come out yet, versus tought me not to get excited till the final game is out so u need to learn it too! :oops:

Looks gorgeous that's for sure. Scale is incredible!

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

God of War 3 looks slightly better, IMO.

When the PS4 and X720 comes out... Oh boy! Wii-U crushed.

faizan_faizan

GOW3 is linear while this is open world.The PS3 and 360 probably can't handle this game without downgrading the visuals.

The game looks better than any other open world game released this gen.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="super600"]

GOW3 is linear while this is open world.The PS3 and 360 probably can't handle this game without downgrading the visuals.

BrunoBRS

He's just saying if the game was running on 360/ps3 we won't we the same results, it will look worse, which is true.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="super600"]

GOW3 is linear while this is open world.The PS3 and 360 probably can't handle this game without downgrading the visuals.

BrunoBRS

I'm pretty sure it won't look that gorgeous in the final version!

DISSESHOWEDO

I agree. It'll look better.

I'd say it is the best looking console game so far, but the frame rate on that video is terrible.

Eryth Sea and Satorl Marsh especially at night and Gauir Plains gets me every time. :)

I don't automatically assume it to be the indisputed best looking game as artstyle and its large nonlinear looking world has a large role on that, but I do see it as a contender from games that have come out so far. If it can keep some of the interesting kinds of environments and atmosphere that Xenoblade had, then thats all that really matters in the long run to me.

AznbkdX

Xenoblade had some great environments. I also loved the concept of living on two massive giants. It's so completely "out there", that it was brilliant.

What is also impressive is that for a 1st gen wiiu title it looks a cut above ps3/360. Imagine how pretty monolith's second crack at wii-u will look. The scale is insane specially if its completely open world free roam (which the flying mech leads me to believe). This is draw distance that rivals Arma 2 and planetside 2. Man dat overworld map. I'm still certain quick ports of 360/ps3 games will not compare favorably for the next year or so but ground up WiiU titles will elevate visuals well past what we are used to from this gen. Its a decent start (albeit late) into the flexing of the WiiU muscle. The limited flying shown here reminds me almost of the upcoming pc game Strike Suit Zero but subatmospheric. Scene for scene it looks as good as the best corridors uc or geow have to offer. This game also illustrates how lazy all current released WiiU titles are but then again launch window deadlines are a ****. Im glad this fed the sheep hunger for visuals, as you can have both gameplay and visuals finally :). If the current mario wiiu was ninty slacking off i can only imagine how awesome a result a passing effort would produce.

Not sure.. It looks good...but maybe someone might think it could be done (with minimal sacrifice) on the current gen systems...maybe? I dunno.campzor

Literally all open world games look pretty terrible compared to this game on the 360 and PS3.

Nope.

I thought sheep didn't care about graphics? :lol: Oh I know, they only care about graphics if they actually have a game that has great graphics. Basically Only if it benefits them, they'll hype it, which is a rare opportunity. Well enjoy your potential graphics console kings while they last, because once PS4 and 720 come out you guys probably wont be making any more threads gloating about graphics. It will be back to "teh gameplay" and "teh DS sales".

I thought sheep didn't care about graphics? :lol: Oh I know, they only care about graphics if they actually have a game that has great graphics. Basically Only if it benefits them, they'll hype it, which is a rare opportunity. Well enjoy your potential graphics console kings while they last, because once PS4 and 720 come out you guys probably wont be making any more threads gloating about graphics. It will be back to "teh gameplay" and "teh DS sales".

SonySoldier-_-

It has always been about gameplay first, having good graphics was a plus. I guess you forgot that the N64 and the Gamecube had good hardware and produced some amazing looking games for their gen. I was dissapointed on the specs for the Wii but it still delivered great games even though it wasn't as strong as the competition. PS4 and next Xbox will obviously will have better graphics but it won't matter to sheep as long as developers take full advantage of the hardware for the Wii U and with this game it's looking good so far.

Nintendo isn't "next gen" technology wise.

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

Eryth Sea and Satorl Marsh especially at night and Gauir Plains gets me every time. :)

I don't automatically assume it to be the indisputed best looking game as artstyle and its large nonlinear looking world has a large role on that, but I do see it as a contender from games that have come out so far. If it can keep some of the interesting kinds of environments and atmosphere that Xenoblade had, then thats all that really matters in the long run to me.

lundy86_4

Xenoblade had some great environments. I also loved the concept of living on two massive giants. It's so completely "out there", that it was brilliant.

What is also impressive is that for a 1st gen wiiu title it looks a cut above ps3/360. Imagine how pretty monolith's second crack at wii-u will look. The scale is insane specially if its completely open world free roam (which the flying mech leads me to believe). This is draw distance that rivals Arma 2 and planetside 2. Man dat overworld map. I'm still certain quick ports of 360/ps3 games will not compare favorably for the next year or so but ground up WiiU titles will elevate visuals well past what we are used to from this gen. Its a decent start (albeit late) into the flexing of the WiiU muscle. The limited flying shown here reminds me almost of the upcoming pc game Strike Suit Zero but subatmospheric. Scene for scene it looks as good as the best corridors uc or geow have to offer. This game also illustrates how lazy all current released WiiU titles are but then again launch window deadlines are a ****. Im glad this fed the sheep hunger for visuals, as you can have both gameplay and visuals finally :). If the current mario wiiu was ninty slacking off i can only imagine how awesome a result a passing effort would produce.

eNT1TY

[QUOTE="campzor"]Not sure.. It looks good...but maybe someone might think it could be done (with minimal sacrifice) on the current gen systems...maybe? I dunno.super600

Literally all open world games look pretty terrible compared to this game on the 360 and PS3.

Not by a long shot.

Lucianu

Best looking game on consoles thus far it seems.

Wouldn't say graphics King but Wii U graphics King it is atm.

[QUOTE="Lucianu"]

Not by a long shot.

NaveedLife

Best looking game on consoles thus far it seems.

crysis 2 actually doesn't look that good... f*cking waste of money. and like i said, yes, i know scale eats resources. but i also said, and i believe it's true, that at the end of the day, one game will be prettier than the other. when you choose to make a large scale game, you're also choosing to compromise your visuals (proportionally to how resource-heavy you can be, how good your programming team is, and how big the game will be). it's simple.BrunoBRS

Crysis 2 looks pretty good to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F8ct8RlvNM

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] crysis 2 actually doesn't look that good... f*cking waste of money. and like i said, yes, i know scale eats resources. but i also said, and i believe it's true, that at the end of the day, one game will be prettier than the other. when you choose to make a large scale game, you're also choosing to compromise your visuals (proportionally to how resource-heavy you can be, how good your programming team is, and how big the game will be). it's simple.RyviusARC

Crysis looks pretty good to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F8ct8RlvNM

I'm sure he was talking about the console versions not a PC mod for Crysis.

[QUOTE="Lucianu"]

Not by a long shot.

NaveedLife

Best looking game on consoles thus far it seems.

[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

[QUOTE="Lucianu"]

Not by a long shot.

faizan_faizan

Best looking game on consoles thus far it seems.

Not an open world game.X is a console graphic king because of how good it looks even though it is open world.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

Best looking game on consoles thus far it seems.

super600

Not an open world game.X is a console graphic king because of how good it looks even though it is open world.