Durango, more like Lolango. GPU weaker than expected.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#201 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25931 Posts

Lol(ango). Victory is ours

wink-point-kaz.gif

[spoiler] But seriously, I don't expect much of a gap in power/graphics [/spoiler]

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts
I have no idea why MS thought it might be a good idea to use one of the weakest aspects of the ps3, the split ram.

Someone is going to get fired.

ReadingRainbow4
Durango doesn't have split ram,it has 8GB unified ram,3GB are say to be reserve for OS but they are unified. The 32MB is ESRAM sort of like Edram on the 360,is basically there to help Durango with its slow ram issues,without ESRAM Durango would be totally starved bandwidth wise,it helps but is not magic and has it fairs drawbacks as well.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#203 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts
Are people forgetting that the Ps3 had a significantly weaker GPU than the 360 yet it's still marginally more powerful, also, i love the way cows jump on every RUMOUR as if it where fact,loldelta3074
That is because the PS3 had a CPU that was a huge investment that started on 2001 and ended on 2005,much like the Xenos with unified shaders,Cell was something new back then,a CPU that could handle GPU task. Durango CPU is an 8 core jaguar,just like the one on the PS4. They both have the same line of GPU,but Durango one has only 16 ROP's and 12 CU. Orbis GPU has 32 ROP's and 18 CU, 4 of which had anbd extra ALU and are dedicated to physics,animations,lighting and so on. So is basically like this.. Durando. 12 CU. 16 ROP's Orbis. 18 CU - 4 dedicated to compute jobs 14 CU for rendering. 32 ROP's No matter what Durando will not be able to keep up with Orbis,these hardware are from the same vendors and the same line of cards,is not like last time Xenos vs RSX,this time is pretty easy to see which is faster and stronger.
Avatar image for marklarmer
marklarmer

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#204 marklarmer
Member since 2004 • 3883 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"]Are people forgetting that the Ps3 had a significantly weaker GPU than the 360 yet it's still marginally more powerful, also, i love the way cows jump on every RUMOUR as if it where fact,loltormentos
That is because the PS3 had a CPU that was a huge investment that started on 2001 and ended on 2005,much like the Xenos with unified shaders,Cell was something new back then,a CPU that could handle GPU task. Durango CPU is an 8 core jaguar,just like the one on the PS4. They both have the same line of GPU,but Durango one has only 16 ROP's and 12 CU. Orbis GPU has 32 ROP's and 18 CU, 4 of which had anbd extra ALU and are dedicated to physics,animations,lighting and so on. So is basically like this.. Durando. 12 CU. 16 ROP's Orbis. 18 CU - 4 dedicated to compute jobs 14 CU for rendering. 32 ROP's No matter what Durando will not be able to keep up with Orbis,these hardware are from the same vendors and the same line of cards,is not like last time Xenos vs RSX,this time is pretty easy to see which is faster and stronger.

what makes me think you've been fapping over this...

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44066 Posts

Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o

Yeah, thought so. :P

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts
what makes me think you've been fapping over this...marklarmer
Non stop..:lol: Na i am just seeing some hoped and dreams get shatter,as MS prepares to emulate the Wii.
Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#207 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o

Yeah, thought so. :P

SecretPolice

Well to be fair sony learned from their design mistakes with the PS3. As far as I know the PS4 is using AMD's tech much like the 720 is except it has better RAM and a more powerful GPU. So it should be alot more clear cut this time, of course I could be wrong because I really haven't been following these rumours in detail.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o

Yeah, thought so. :P

SecretPolice
Oh please a week after sony showed the specs of the PS3,MS did a chart to show how the xbox 360 had 3 times more general purpose code power on the 360 CPU than sony had on Cell,because sony had 1 core and the Xenon had 3,alone with another stupids charts as well,in fact the first to over hype the console was MS. When they unveil the xbox on may 12 2005 on MTV.claiming 1TF performance,both companies played with specs and MS was first.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#209 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

Oh yeah! Gandalf with a shotgun! That would have made the movies so much better.

delta3074
Shotgun?

Sorry my weapon knowledge is not very good, that really isn't a shotgun is it. I usually let other people do the shooting bits. Like they say, the greatest warrior is the one who never fights at all.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#210 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
I dont know which is worse. Console fanboys or GPU fanboys.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#211 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

Oh yeah! Gandalf with a shotgun! That would have made the movies so much better.

KungfuKitten
Shotgun?

Sorry my weapon knowledge is not very good, that really isn't a shotgun is it. I usually let other people do the shooting bits. Like they say, the greatest warrior is the one who never fights at all.

Its an AK-47.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44066 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o

Yeah, thought so. :P

tormentos

Oh please a week after sony showed the specs of the PS3,MS did a chart to show how the xbox 360 had 3 times more general purpose code power on the 360 CPU than sony had on Cell,because sony had 1 core and the Xenon had 3,alone with another stupids charts as well,in fact the first to over hype the console was MS. When they unveil the xbox on may 12 2005 on MTV.claiming 1TF performance,both companies played with specs and MS was first.

I'm talking about the way thing were talked about in SW - ya know, almost precisely what's going on right now with ahem, won't mention any names but people on here spouting off about specs and performance based on nothing but rumours. :P

Avatar image for StormyJoe
StormyJoe

7806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#213 StormyJoe
Member since 2011 • 7806 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"]Now even I'm getting tired of these rumours.ReadingRainbow4

This isn't a rumor.

An article from VGLEAKS isn't a rumor? Wow. Hey, I have a bridge for sale... cheap!

Avatar image for speedfog
speedfog

4966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#214 speedfog
Member since 2009 • 4966 Posts

PS3 was supposed to be much much stronger then the 360. Guesse how that turned out? Most multiplats look better on the 360 then on the ps3. Oh well, have fun paying 599 US dollars for your console.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#215 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o

Yeah, thought so. :P

SecretPolice

 

I was just thinking exactly the same, wait and see people!

I imagine the specs will be almost identical both on paper and real World performance in the end anyway

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#216 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o

Yeah, thought so. :P

SecretPolice

Oh please a week after sony showed the specs of the PS3,MS did a chart to show how the xbox 360 had 3 times more general purpose code power on the 360 CPU than sony had on Cell,because sony had 1 core and the Xenon had 3,alone with another stupids charts as well,in fact the first to over hype the console was MS. When they unveil the xbox on may 12 2005 on MTV.claiming 1TF performance,both companies played with specs and MS was first.

I'm talking about the way thing were talked about in SW - ya know, almost precisely what's going on right now with ahem, won't mention any names but people on here spouting off about specs and performance based on nothing but rumours. :P

 

guilty! :oops:


I was a true cow on here back in 2005/2006/2007.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44066 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Oh please a week after sony showed the specs of the PS3,MS did a chart to show how the xbox 360 had 3 times more general purpose code power on the 360 CPU than sony had on Cell,because sony had 1 core and the Xenon had 3,alone with another stupids charts as well,in fact the first to over hype the console was MS. When they unveil the xbox on may 12 2005 on MTV.claiming 1TF performance,both companies played with specs and MS was first._Matt_

I'm talking about the way thing were talked about in SW - ya know, almost precisely what's going on right now with ahem, won't mention any names but people on here spouting off about specs and performance based on nothing but rumours. :P

guilty! :oops:


I was a true cow on here back in 2005/2006/2007.

You sir are one stand-up kinda guy. :)

I'm stating to wonder if all the crow that many had to eat this gen are now hungering for some next gen desert...

humblepie.png#Obama%20eating%20humble%20:P

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts
http://i.minus.com/i1ot2q1bfpm6z.gif :lol: Es damn epic..
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#219 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30570 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"]Are people forgetting that the Ps3 had a significantly weaker GPU than the 360 yet it's still marginally more powerful, also, i love the way cows jump on every RUMOUR as if it where fact,loltormentos
That is because the PS3 had a CPU that was a huge investment that started on 2001 and ended on 2005,much like the Xenos with unified shaders,Cell was something new back then,a CPU that could handle GPU task. Durango CPU is an 8 core jaguar,just like the one on the PS4. They both have the same line of GPU,but Durango one has only 16 ROP's and 12 CU. Orbis GPU has 32 ROP's and 18 CU, 4 of which had anbd extra ALU and are dedicated to physics,animations,lighting and so on. So is basically like this.. Durando. 12 CU. 16 ROP's Orbis. 18 CU - 4 dedicated to compute jobs 14 CU for rendering. 32 ROP's No matter what Durando will not be able to keep up with Orbis,these hardware are from the same vendors and the same line of cards,is not like last time Xenos vs RSX,this time is pretty easy to see which is faster and stronger.

Assuming you know what you are talking about and those specs are real, how will Durango and Orbis compare to 360 and PS3 in capabilities?

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#220 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts
I was just thinking exactly the same, wait and see people!

I imagine the specs will be almost identical both on paper and real World performance in the end anyway

_Matt_
I don't know what the specs will be,i am going by the leaks,if they are true there is no way in hell they will be identical.
Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#221 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="delta3074"]Are people forgetting that the Ps3 had a significantly weaker GPU than the 360 yet it's still marginally more powerful, also, i love the way cows jump on every RUMOUR as if it where fact,lolPAL360

That is because the PS3 had a CPU that was a huge investment that started on 2001 and ended on 2005,much like the Xenos with unified shaders,Cell was something new back then,a CPU that could handle GPU task. Durango CPU is an 8 core jaguar,just like the one on the PS4. They both have the same line of GPU,but Durango one has only 16 ROP's and 12 CU. Orbis GPU has 32 ROP's and 18 CU, 4 of which had anbd extra ALU and are dedicated to physics,animations,lighting and so on. So is basically like this.. Durando. 12 CU. 16 ROP's Orbis. 18 CU - 4 dedicated to compute jobs 14 CU for rendering. 32 ROP's No matter what Durando will not be able to keep up with Orbis,these hardware are from the same vendors and the same line of cards,is not like last time Xenos vs RSX,this time is pretty easy to see which is faster and stronger.

Assuming you know what you are talking about and those specs are real, how will Durango and Orbis compare to 360 and PS3 in capabilities?

 

If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#222 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]I'm talking about the way thing were talked about in SW - ya know, almost precisely what's going on right now with ahem, won't mention any names but people on here spouting off about specs and performance based on nothing but rumours. :P

SecretPolice

 

guilty! :oops:


I was a true cow on here back in 2005/2006/2007.

You sir are one stand-up kinda guy. :)

I'm stating to wonder if all the crow that many had to eat this gen are now hungering for some next gen desert...

humblepie.png#Obama%20eating%20humble%20:P

 

Why thank you sir.

mmm pie! :P

 

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts
PAL360
I am sure Durango will run all games Orbis run at least multiplatforms,but probably at lower resolution,or probably with lower AA,less detail or lower frames if not a combination of several. This is going by this specs which fanboysm aside are not 100% confirmed until MS and sony come forward,all is going by the leaks.
Avatar image for Magik85
Magik85

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 Magik85
Member since 2009 • 1078 Posts
its just another rumor....nothing else.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#225 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30570 Posts

If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.

_Matt_

Enough power to run Battlefirld 3 or Crysis 3 on max settings, Unreal Engine 4, DX11, etc?

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#226 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60713 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.

PAL360

Enough power to run Battlefirld 3 or Crysis 3 on max settings, Unreal Engine 4, DX11, etc?

All you need to worry about is it will run Kinect(lol) Sports 3 just fine!
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#227 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.

PAL360

Enough power to run Battlefirld 3 or Crysis 3 on max settings, Unreal Engine 4, DX11, etc?

BF3 maybe but not Crysis 3 etc.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.

PAL360

Enough power to run Battlefirld 3 or Crysis 3 on max settings, Unreal Engine 4, DX11, etc?

Battlefield 3 probably on Ultra at 30FPS in 1080P. The 720 is say to perform close to the 7770,it would be more efficient,so probably the same for Crysis as well.
Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#229 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.

PAL360

Enough power to run Battlefirld 3 or Crysis 3 on max settings, Unreal Engine 4, DX11, etc?

 

I would say so yes. Maybe not 60fps, but yeah, 1080p 30fps will play those. Obviously I have no proof, benchmarks, etc. but just an educated guess. Perhaps not at launch title stage, but shortly after.

But as the next gen progresses I am sure we will see games looking maybe even better on the consoles than Crysis 3 Max, etc.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#231 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.

if that happens, then we are in for a pretty crap generation.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#232 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30570 Posts

even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.TheGuardian03

According to rumors, Battlefield 4 will have improved graphics, run at 60 fps with 64 players, on next gen consoles.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#233 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.TheGuardian03

 

I'm confused, you just contradicted yourself. How can they care about graphics but not about 1080? The resolution is all part of the graphics.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#234 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.PAL360

According to rumors, Battlefield 4 will have improved graphics, run at 60 fps with 64 players, on next gen consoles.

 

Seems reasonable. I would very much like this to be so :) . Do you have any source for this?

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#235 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.TheGuardian03

There is 0% chance of that happening. 

It would be asinine.  Ramp the textures up 400% or more but render in 720p so we can't see any of it?

Btw it's not going to be 4x, it's 6x minimum current gen even for Durango.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#236 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30570 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics._Matt_

According to rumors, Battlefield 4 will have improved graphics, run at 60 fps with 64 players, on next gen consoles.

Seems reasonable. I would very much like this to be so :) . Do you have any source for this?

Indeed =)

http://www.examiner.com/article/playstation-4-and-battlefield-4-will-debut-together-details-leaked

There are many other sources if you google it, but then again, just rumors so far.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#237 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

According to rumors, Battlefield 4 will have improved graphics, run at 60 fps with 64 players, on next gen consoles.

PAL360

 

Seems reasonable. I would very much like this to be so :) . Do you have any source for this?

Indeed =)

http://www.examiner.com/article/playstation-4-and-battlefield-4-will-debut-together-details-leaked

There are many other sources if you google it, but then again, just rumors so far.

 

Thank you sir, that's some quite positive rumours, even if only rumours

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#238 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

I think we'll see quite a lot more games running at 60fps next gen, the power is there.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#239 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.Chozofication

There is 0% chance of that happening. 

It would be asinine.  Ramp the textures up 400% or more but render in 720p so we can't see any of it?

Btw it's not going to be 4x, it's 6x minimum current gen even for Durango.

 

The 4x was a reserved and down to Earth estimate I thought.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#240 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60713 Posts

I think we'll see quite a lot more games running at 60fps next gen, the power is there.

Chozofication
Well kinect games dont require much horse power tbo.
Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#241 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

I think we'll see quite a lot more games running at 60fps next gen, the power is there.

Chozofication

 

Agreed, and 1080p too.

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#242 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

[QUOTE="Chozofication"]

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics._Matt_

There is 0% chance of that happening. 

It would be asinine.  Ramp the textures up 400% or more but render in 720p so we can't see any of it?

Btw it's not going to be 4x, it's 6x minimum current gen even for Durango.

 

The 4x was a reserved and down to Earth estimate I thought.

The pitcairn gpu's (AMD 78xx series) in both consoles (even though Durango's looks to be cut down a lot) is an enourmous leap. 

 

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#243 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

[QUOTE="Chozofication"]

There is 0% chance of that happening. 

It would be asinine.  Ramp the textures up 400% or more but render in 720p so we can't see any of it?

Btw it's not going to be 4x, it's 6x minimum current gen even for Durango.

Chozofication

 

The 4x was a reserved and down to Earth estimate I thought.

The pitcairn gpu's (AMD 78xx series) in both consoles (even though Durango's looks to be cut down a lot) is an enourmous leap. 

 

 

If rumours are true, it will be an enourmous leap yes, would you not say 4x is a large leap anyway? :P

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#244 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

[QUOTE="Chozofication"]

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

 

The 4x was a reserved and down to Earth estimate I thought.

_Matt_

The pitcairn gpu's (AMD 78xx series) in both consoles (even though Durango's looks to be cut down a lot) is an enourmous leap. 

 

 

If rumours are true, it will be an enourmous leap yes, would you not say 4x is a large leap anyway? :P

Nope.  That'd be pathetic.  :P  Wii U is already close to double. 

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#246 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.TheGuardian03

 

I'm confused, you just contradicted yourself. How can they care about graphics but not about 1080? The resolution is all part of the graphics.

having a game in 1080p pushes the hardware, why do that when you can have it in 720p and have more effects. they will have alot more power so they will use that for something else, don't count on 1080p or 60 fps, this is what i believe. 60 fps will be fighters, racers and 2d/3d platformers and hack and slash games.

 

I think a lot of games this gen would have benefitted a lot more from a higher resolution than more effects to be honest. Examples come to mind being Killzone 3, Red Dead Redemption, both had great textures, effects, etc. for consoles, but what let both down was the low resolutions. Games need to be higher resolution for the graphics and effects to be fully appreciated.

 

I agree we will still see 30fps games, but I highly doubt 720p will be the norm, that's like releasing the ps3 and 360 with all that power but keeping it in standard definition all those years ago. 

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#248 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

i agree, it would be great to see games like KZ3 in 1080p, hopefully i am wrong.TheGuardian03

Look at Hawken on the PC. When I first saw it, my first thought was it looked like KZ3 at 1080p.

Avatar image for sonny2dap
sonny2dap

2066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#249 sonny2dap
Member since 2008 • 2066 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"][QUOTE="_Matt_"]

 

I'm confused, you just contradicted yourself. How can they care about graphics but not about 1080? The resolution is all part of the graphics.

_Matt_

having a game in 1080p pushes the hardware, why do that when you can have it in 720p and have more effects. they will have alot more power so they will use that for something else, don't count on 1080p or 60 fps, this is what i believe. 60 fps will be fighters, racers and 2d/3d platformers and hack and slash games.

 

I think a lot of games this gen would have benefitted a lot more from a higher resolution than more effects to be honest. Examples come to mind being Killzone 3, Red Dead Redemption, both had great textures, effects, etc. for consoles, but what let both down was the low resolutions. Games need to be higher resolution for the graphics and effects to be fully appreciated.

 

I agree we will still see 30fps games, but I highly doubt 720p will be the norm, that's like releasing the ps3 and 360 with all that power but keeping it in standard definition all those years ago. 

whilst a higher res is nice, i think games with crap loads going on and huge interactive environments will be much more important than any res or frame rate bumps.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#250 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"] having a game in 1080p pushes the hardware, why do that when you can have it in 720p and have more effects. they will have alot more power so they will use that for something else, don't count on 1080p or 60 fps, this is what i believe. 60 fps will be fighters, racers and 2d/3d platformers and hack and slash games.sonny2dap

 

I think a lot of games this gen would have benefitted a lot more from a higher resolution than more effects to be honest. Examples come to mind being Killzone 3, Red Dead Redemption, both had great textures, effects, etc. for consoles, but what let both down was the low resolutions. Games need to be higher resolution for the graphics and effects to be fully appreciated.

 

I agree we will still see 30fps games, but I highly doubt 720p will be the norm, that's like releasing the ps3 and 360 with all that power but keeping it in standard definition all those years ago. 

whilst a higher res is nice, i think games with crap loads going on and huge interactive environments will be much more important than any res or frame rate bumps.

i am with this guy, i don't see the point in 'more of the same' with higher resolutions and framerates, i want more intercation with Bigger enviroments and, like this guy said, 'Crap loads going on'