Lol(ango). Victory is ours
[spoiler] But seriously, I don't expect much of a gap in power/graphics [/spoiler]
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Lol(ango). Victory is ours
[spoiler] But seriously, I don't expect much of a gap in power/graphics [/spoiler]
I have no idea why MS thought it might be a good idea to use one of the weakest aspects of the ps3, the split ram.Durango doesn't have split ram,it has 8GB unified ram,3GB are say to be reserve for OS but they are unified. The 32MB is ESRAM sort of like Edram on the 360,is basically there to help Durango with its slow ram issues,without ESRAM Durango would be totally starved bandwidth wise,it helps but is not magic and has it fairs drawbacks as well.Someone is going to get fired.
ReadingRainbow4
Are people forgetting that the Ps3 had a significantly weaker GPU than the 360 yet it's still marginally more powerful, also, i love the way cows jump on every RUMOUR as if it where fact,loldelta3074That is because the PS3 had a CPU that was a huge investment that started on 2001 and ended on 2005,much like the Xenos with unified shaders,Cell was something new back then,a CPU that could handle GPU task. Durango CPU is an 8 core jaguar,just like the one on the PS4. They both have the same line of GPU,but Durango one has only 16 ROP's and 12 CU. Orbis GPU has 32 ROP's and 18 CU, 4 of which had anbd extra ALU and are dedicated to physics,animations,lighting and so on. So is basically like this.. Durando. 12 CU. 16 ROP's Orbis. 18 CU - 4 dedicated to compute jobs 14 CU for rendering. 32 ROP's No matter what Durando will not be able to keep up with Orbis,these hardware are from the same vendors and the same line of cards,is not like last time Xenos vs RSX,this time is pretty easy to see which is faster and stronger.
[QUOTE="delta3074"]Are people forgetting that the Ps3 had a significantly weaker GPU than the 360 yet it's still marginally more powerful, also, i love the way cows jump on every RUMOUR as if it where fact,loltormentosThat is because the PS3 had a CPU that was a huge investment that started on 2001 and ended on 2005,much like the Xenos with unified shaders,Cell was something new back then,a CPU that could handle GPU task. Durango CPU is an 8 core jaguar,just like the one on the PS4. They both have the same line of GPU,but Durango one has only 16 ROP's and 12 CU. Orbis GPU has 32 ROP's and 18 CU, 4 of which had anbd extra ALU and are dedicated to physics,animations,lighting and so on. So is basically like this.. Durando. 12 CU. 16 ROP's Orbis. 18 CU - 4 dedicated to compute jobs 14 CU for rendering. 32 ROP's No matter what Durando will not be able to keep up with Orbis,these hardware are from the same vendors and the same line of cards,is not like last time Xenos vs RSX,this time is pretty easy to see which is faster and stronger.what makes me think you've been fapping over this...
Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o
Yeah, thought so. :P
Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o
Yeah, thought so. :P
SecretPolice
Well to be fair sony learned from their design mistakes with the PS3. As far as I know the PS4 is using AMD's tech much like the 720 is except it has better RAM and a more powerful GPU. So it should be alot more clear cut this time, of course I could be wrong because I really haven't been following these rumours in detail.
Oh please a week after sony showed the specs of the PS3,MS did a chart to show how the xbox 360 had 3 times more general purpose code power on the 360 CPU than sony had on Cell,because sony had 1 core and the Xenon had 3,alone with another stupids charts as well,in fact the first to over hype the console was MS. When they unveil the xbox on may 12 2005 on MTV.claiming 1TF performance,both companies played with specs and MS was first.Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o
Yeah, thought so. :P
SecretPolice
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]Shotgun? Sorry my weapon knowledge is not very good, that really isn't a shotgun is it. I usually let other people do the shooting bits. Like they say, the greatest warrior is the one who never fights at all.Oh yeah! Gandalf with a shotgun! That would have made the movies so much better.
delta3074
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]Shotgun? Sorry my weapon knowledge is not very good, that really isn't a shotgun is it. I usually let other people do the shooting bits. Like they say, the greatest warrior is the one who never fights at all. Its an AK-47.Oh yeah! Gandalf with a shotgun! That would have made the movies so much better.
KungfuKitten
[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]Oh please a week after sony showed the specs of the PS3,MS did a chart to show how the xbox 360 had 3 times more general purpose code power on the 360 CPU than sony had on Cell,because sony had 1 core and the Xenon had 3,alone with another stupids charts as well,in fact the first to over hype the console was MS. When they unveil the xbox on may 12 2005 on MTV.claiming 1TF performance,both companies played with specs and MS was first.I'm talking about the way thing were talked about in SW - ya know, almost precisely what's going on right now with ahem, won't mention any names but people on here spouting off about specs and performance based on nothing but rumours. :PIs it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o
Yeah, thought so. :P
tormentos
Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o
Yeah, thought so. :P
SecretPolice
Â
I was just thinking exactly the same, wait and see people!
I imagine the specs will be almost identical both on paper and real World performance in the end anyway
Oh please a week after sony showed the specs of the PS3,MS did a chart to show how the xbox 360 had 3 times more general purpose code power on the 360 CPU than sony had on Cell,because sony had 1 core and the Xenon had 3,alone with another stupids charts as well,in fact the first to over hype the console was MS. When they unveil the xbox on may 12 2005 on MTV.claiming 1TF performance,both companies played with specs and MS was first.I'm talking about the way thing were talked about in SW - ya know, almost precisely what's going on right now with ahem, won't mention any names but people on here spouting off about specs and performance based on nothing but rumours. :P[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]
Is it just me or does all this seem very familiar to 2006 with all that umm, stuff that was said about how PS3 when release, will crush the weaker 360? :o
Yeah, thought so. :P
SecretPolice
Â
guilty! :oops:
I was a true cow on here back in 2005/2006/2007.
I'm talking about the way thing were talked about in SW - ya know, almost precisely what's going on right now with ahem, won't mention any names but people on here spouting off about specs and performance based on nothing but rumours. :P[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]
[QUOTE="tormentos"] Oh please a week after sony showed the specs of the PS3,MS did a chart to show how the xbox 360 had 3 times more general purpose code power on the 360 CPU than sony had on Cell,because sony had 1 core and the Xenon had 3,alone with another stupids charts as well,in fact the first to over hype the console was MS. When they unveil the xbox on may 12 2005 on MTV.claiming 1TF performance,both companies played with specs and MS was first._Matt_
guilty! :oops:
I was a true cow on here back in 2005/2006/2007.
You sir are one stand-up kinda guy. :)I'm stating to wonder if all the crow that many had to eat this gen are now hungering for some next gen desert...
:P
[QUOTE="delta3074"]Are people forgetting that the Ps3 had a significantly weaker GPU than the 360 yet it's still marginally more powerful, also, i love the way cows jump on every RUMOUR as if it where fact,loltormentosThat is because the PS3 had a CPU that was a huge investment that started on 2001 and ended on 2005,much like the Xenos with unified shaders,Cell was something new back then,a CPU that could handle GPU task. Durango CPU is an 8 core jaguar,just like the one on the PS4. They both have the same line of GPU,but Durango one has only 16 ROP's and 12 CU. Orbis GPU has 32 ROP's and 18 CU, 4 of which had anbd extra ALU and are dedicated to physics,animations,lighting and so on. So is basically like this.. Durando. 12 CU. 16 ROP's Orbis. 18 CU - 4 dedicated to compute jobs 14 CU for rendering. 32 ROP's No matter what Durando will not be able to keep up with Orbis,these hardware are from the same vendors and the same line of cards,is not like last time Xenos vs RSX,this time is pretty easy to see which is faster and stronger.
Assuming you know what you are talking about and those specs are real, how will Durango and Orbis compare to 360 and PS3 in capabilities?
I was just thinking exactly the same, wait and see people!I don't know what the specs will be,i am going by the leaks,if they are true there is no way in hell they will be identical.I imagine the specs will be almost identical both on paper and real World performance in the end anyway
_Matt_
That is because the PS3 had a CPU that was a huge investment that started on 2001 and ended on 2005,much like the Xenos with unified shaders,Cell was something new back then,a CPU that could handle GPU task. Durango CPU is an 8 core jaguar,just like the one on the PS4. They both have the same line of GPU,but Durango one has only 16 ROP's and 12 CU. Orbis GPU has 32 ROP's and 18 CU, 4 of which had anbd extra ALU and are dedicated to physics,animations,lighting and so on. So is basically like this.. Durando. 12 CU. 16 ROP's Orbis. 18 CU - 4 dedicated to compute jobs 14 CU for rendering. 32 ROP's No matter what Durando will not be able to keep up with Orbis,these hardware are from the same vendors and the same line of cards,is not like last time Xenos vs RSX,this time is pretty easy to see which is faster and stronger.[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="delta3074"]Are people forgetting that the Ps3 had a significantly weaker GPU than the 360 yet it's still marginally more powerful, also, i love the way cows jump on every RUMOUR as if it where fact,lolPAL360
Assuming you know what you are talking about and those specs are real, how will Durango and Orbis compare to 360 and PS3 in capabilities?
Â
If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]I'm talking about the way thing were talked about in SW - ya know, almost precisely what's going on right now with ahem, won't mention any names but people on here spouting off about specs and performance based on nothing but rumours. :P
SecretPolice
Â
guilty! :oops:
I was a true cow on here back in 2005/2006/2007.
You sir are one stand-up kinda guy. :)I'm stating to wonder if all the crow that many had to eat this gen are now hungering for some next gen desert...
:P
Â
Why thank you sir.
mmm pie! :P
Â
PAL360I am sure Durango will run all games Orbis run at least multiplatforms,but probably at lower resolution,or probably with lower AA,less detail or lower frames if not a combination of several. This is going by this specs which fanboysm aside are not 100% confirmed until MS and sony come forward,all is going by the leaks.
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.
PAL360
Enough power to run Battlefirld 3 or Crysis 3 on max settings, Unreal Engine 4, DX11, etc?
All you need to worry about is it will run Kinect(lol) Sports 3 just fine![QUOTE="_Matt_"]
If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.
PAL360
Enough power to run Battlefirld 3 or Crysis 3 on max settings, Unreal Engine 4, DX11, etc?
Battlefield 3 probably on Ultra at 30FPS in 1080P. The 720 is say to perform close to the 7770,it would be more efficient,so probably the same for Crysis as well.[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
If those specs are real, probs about 4 times more powerful than current gen machines.
PAL360
Enough power to run Battlefirld 3 or Crysis 3 on max settings, Unreal Engine 4, DX11, etc?
Â
I would say so yes. Maybe not 60fps, but yeah, 1080p 30fps will play those. Obviously I have no proof, benchmarks, etc. but just an educated guess. Perhaps not at launch title stage, but shortly after.
But as the next gen progresses I am sure we will see games looking maybe even better on the consoles than Crysis 3 Max, etc.
even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.TheGuardian03
According to rumors, Battlefield 4 will have improved graphics, run at 60 fps with 64 players, on next gen consoles.
even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.TheGuardian03
Â
I'm confused, you just contradicted yourself. How can they care about graphics but not about 1080? The resolution is all part of the graphics.
[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.PAL360
According to rumors, Battlefield 4 will have improved graphics, run at 60 fps with 64 players, on next gen consoles.
Â
Seems reasonable. I would very much like this to be so :) . Do you have any source for this?
even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.TheGuardian03
There is 0% chance of that happening.Â
It would be asinine. Ramp the textures up 400% or more but render in 720p so we can't see any of it?
Btw it's not going to be 4x, it's 6x minimum current gen even for Durango.
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics._Matt_
According to rumors, Battlefield 4 will have improved graphics, run at 60 fps with 64 players, on next gen consoles.
Seems reasonable. I would very much like this to be so :) . Do you have any source for this?
Indeed =)
http://www.examiner.com/article/playstation-4-and-battlefield-4-will-debut-together-details-leaked
There are many other sources if you google it, but then again, just rumors so far.
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
According to rumors, Battlefield 4 will have improved graphics, run at 60 fps with 64 players, on next gen consoles.
PAL360
Â
Seems reasonable. I would very much like this to be so :) . Do you have any source for this?
Indeed =)
http://www.examiner.com/article/playstation-4-and-battlefield-4-will-debut-together-details-leaked
There are many other sources if you google it, but then again, just rumors so far.
Â
Thank you sir, that's some quite positive rumours, even if only rumours
[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.Chozofication
There is 0% chance of that happening.Â
It would be asinine. Ramp the textures up 400% or more but render in 720p so we can't see any of it?
Btw it's not going to be 4x, it's 6x minimum current gen even for Durango.
Â
The 4x was a reserved and down to Earth estimate I thought.
[QUOTE="Chozofication"]
[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics._Matt_
There is 0% chance of that happening.Â
It would be asinine. Ramp the textures up 400% or more but render in 720p so we can't see any of it?
Btw it's not going to be 4x, it's 6x minimum current gen even for Durango.
Â
The 4x was a reserved and down to Earth estimate I thought.
The pitcairn gpu's (AMD 78xx series) in both consoles (even though Durango's looks to be cut down a lot) is an enourmous leap.Â
Â
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
[QUOTE="Chozofication"]
There is 0% chance of that happening.Â
It would be asinine. Ramp the textures up 400% or more but render in 720p so we can't see any of it?
Btw it's not going to be 4x, it's 6x minimum current gen even for Durango.
Chozofication
Â
The 4x was a reserved and down to Earth estimate I thought.
The pitcairn gpu's (AMD 78xx series) in both consoles (even though Durango's looks to be cut down a lot) is an enourmous leap.Â
Â
Â
If rumours are true, it will be an enourmous leap yes, would you not say 4x is a large leap anyway? :P
[QUOTE="Chozofication"]
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
Â
The 4x was a reserved and down to Earth estimate I thought.
_Matt_
The pitcairn gpu's (AMD 78xx series) in both consoles (even though Durango's looks to be cut down a lot) is an enourmous leap.Â
Â
Â
If rumours are true, it will be an enourmous leap yes, would you not say 4x is a large leap anyway? :P
Nope. That'd be pathetic. :P Wii U is already close to double.Â
[QUOTE="_Matt_"][QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]even if next gen consles are alot more powerful than ps3 and 360 i think devs will go with 30 fps and 720p. they don't care about 60 fps or 1080p they just want graphics.TheGuardian03
Â
I'm confused, you just contradicted yourself. How can they care about graphics but not about 1080? The resolution is all part of the graphics.
having a game in 1080p pushes the hardware, why do that when you can have it in 720p and have more effects. they will have alot more power so they will use that for something else, don't count on 1080p or 60 fps, this is what i believe. 60 fps will be fighters, racers and 2d/3d platformers and hack and slash games.Â
I think a lot of games this gen would have benefitted a lot more from a higher resolution than more effects to be honest. Examples come to mind being Killzone 3, Red Dead Redemption, both had great textures, effects, etc. for consoles, but what let both down was the low resolutions. Games need to be higher resolution for the graphics and effects to be fully appreciated.
Â
I agree we will still see 30fps games, but I highly doubt 720p will be the norm, that's like releasing the ps3 and 360 with all that power but keeping it in standard definition all those years ago.Â
i agree, it would be great to see games like KZ3 in 1080p, hopefully i am wrong.TheGuardian03
Look at Hawken on the PC. When I first saw it, my first thought was it looked like KZ3 at 1080p.
having a game in 1080p pushes the hardware, why do that when you can have it in 720p and have more effects. they will have alot more power so they will use that for something else, don't count on 1080p or 60 fps, this is what i believe. 60 fps will be fighters, racers and 2d/3d platformers and hack and slash games.[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"][QUOTE="_Matt_"]
Â
I'm confused, you just contradicted yourself. How can they care about graphics but not about 1080? The resolution is all part of the graphics.
_Matt_
Â
I think a lot of games this gen would have benefitted a lot more from a higher resolution than more effects to be honest. Examples come to mind being Killzone 3, Red Dead Redemption, both had great textures, effects, etc. for consoles, but what let both down was the low resolutions. Games need to be higher resolution for the graphics and effects to be fully appreciated.
Â
I agree we will still see 30fps games, but I highly doubt 720p will be the norm, that's like releasing the ps3 and 360 with all that power but keeping it in standard definition all those years ago.Â
whilst a higher res is nice, i think games with crap loads going on and huge interactive environments will be much more important than any res or frame rate bumps.[QUOTE="_Matt_"][QUOTE="TheGuardian03"] having a game in 1080p pushes the hardware, why do that when you can have it in 720p and have more effects. they will have alot more power so they will use that for something else, don't count on 1080p or 60 fps, this is what i believe. 60 fps will be fighters, racers and 2d/3d platformers and hack and slash games.sonny2dap
Â
I think a lot of games this gen would have benefitted a lot more from a higher resolution than more effects to be honest. Examples come to mind being Killzone 3, Red Dead Redemption, both had great textures, effects, etc. for consoles, but what let both down was the low resolutions. Games need to be higher resolution for the graphics and effects to be fully appreciated.
Â
I agree we will still see 30fps games, but I highly doubt 720p will be the norm, that's like releasing the ps3 and 360 with all that power but keeping it in standard definition all those years ago.Â
whilst a higher res is nice, i think games with crap loads going on and huge interactive environments will be much more important than any res or frame rate bumps.i am with this guy, i don't see the point in 'more of the same' with higher resolutions and framerates, i want more intercation with Bigger enviroments and, like this guy said, 'Crap loads going on'Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment