Cyberpunk 2077 PC Demo: 1080p w/DLSS (aka 720P) with raytracing on RTX 2080Ti

  • 65 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for galiualfre
galiualfre

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 galiualfre
Member since 2006 • 38 Posts

@BassMan: @lundy86_4:

Thanks for answering both of you, I live in Perú, computer parts are very expensive here because gamers are buying more PC's that consoles at the moment (years ago it was the opposite). So, when I build this rig I was thinking in Cyberpunk 2077 (also RDR2) and wanted to play it good. Hope it runs at least "acceptable".

Cheers to everyone.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

7419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#52 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 7419 Posts

@Juub1990: So they had a 2080 Ti but they 'chose' to play in 1080p (720p). Why wouldn't they choose to run native 4K? Do they 'prefer' the look of fewer pixels?

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

7419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#53 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 7419 Posts

@goldenelementxl: And an RTX 2080 Ti is like $50 per frame.

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

13047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#54  Edited By xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 13047 Posts

@Mozelleple112 said:

Imagine paying €1500 for a graphics card (€3500+ PC) and having to play a game in 1080p(720p) holy crap.

If that was your takeaway from this I think you will be disappointed with the console versions of this game

Avatar image for fedor
Fedor

6877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By Fedor
Member since 2015 • 6877 Posts

@Mozelleple112 said:

@Juub1990: So they had a 2080 Ti but they 'chose' to play in 1080p (720p). Why wouldn't they choose to run native 4K? Do they 'prefer' the look of fewer pixels?

Yes... They could turn off RT if they wanted. They also wouldn't run it at native 4k, they'd use DLSS and run 4k (1440p) to have a better overall picture than native 4k and superior frame rates as well.

Avatar image for Bond007uk
Bond007uk

983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Bond007uk
Member since 2002 • 983 Posts

I've played Control with RTX on using DLSS 2.0 to run the game at 720P scaled to 1440P. DLSS 2.0 is so great it looks like 1440P native.

Avatar image for goldenelementxl
GoldenElementXL

4322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By GoldenElementXL
Member since 2016 • 4322 Posts

@Mozelleple112 said:

@goldenelementxl: And an RTX 2080 Ti is like $50 per frame.

Uh, you think RTX 2080Ti owners are playing at 30FPS? Lol, 30fps is for consoles! I play at 144fps. So I paid about $9.02 per frame.

So a PS4 is more expensive per frame than a RTX 2080Ti... Let that sink in folks

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

31509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58  Edited By tormentos
Member since 2003 • 31509 Posts

@goldenelementxl said:
@Mozelleple112 said:

@goldenelementxl: And an RTX 2080 Ti is like $50 per frame.

Uh, you think RTX 2080Ti owners are playing at 30FPS? Lol, 30fps is for consoles! I play at 144fps. So I paid about $9.02 per frame...

No with raytracing games such as this which is the point.

And before you come in and say oh i just don't use RT well yeah that make you and even bigger peasant lol paying $1300 for a GPU to not be able to run RT is lol worthy.

I think there is not a single argument you can pull that can justify the existance of such over priced garbage from Nvidia.

Reading the word 1080p and 2080ti in the same sentense is cringe worty.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

7419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 7419 Posts

@goldenelementxl:

I don't count playing low settings at 144fps anything to be proud of.

It is nothing less than embarrassing that a GPU that costs three playstation 5's on its own cannot run a game in 4K, let alone 1440p or *swallows vomit* ... 1080p.

Avatar image for goldenelementxl
GoldenElementXL

4322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 GoldenElementXL
Member since 2016 • 4322 Posts

@Mozelleple112 said:

@goldenelementxl:

I don't count playing low settings at 144fps anything to be proud of.

It is nothing less than embarrassing that a GPU that costs three playstation 5's on its own cannot run a game in 4K, let alone 1440p or *swallows vomit* ... 1080p.

Well you better buckle in for the console details then. We're looking at a lower than PC low, missing features, sub 720p with drops below 30fps at this rate. If that was the Cyberpunk 2077 I was presented with, I wouldn't play it at all.

Buh buh buh muh load timez!!1!1

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

40127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#61 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 40127 Posts

@tormentos said:

Reading the word 1080p and 2080ti in the same sentense is cringe worty.

Not as "cringe worty" as Ray Tracing on the PS5.🤣

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

7419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 7419 Posts

@goldenelementxl: $100 GPU vs $1500 GPU. I would expect at least 7x the performance, if not 15

I wouldn't play Cyberpunk on a 2080Ti either.

Avatar image for gifford38
Gifford38

1049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#63 Gifford38
Member since 2020 • 1049 Posts

@galiualfre said:

Hello, I have a computer with this specs:

- CPU: RYZEN 3700x

- GPU: NVIDIA GTX1660S 6GB GIGABYTE

- RAM: 32 GB HYPERX FURY BLACK 3466 MHZ

- MAINBOARD: ASROCK X470 TAICHI ULTIMATE

It would be able to run Cyberpunk 2077?

no you need a series x to have games that are full raytracing and still have 60fps because its 12 teraflops.

even the most expensive gpu can't do it but some how the series x will. according to everyone here in system wars.

Avatar image for goldenelementxl
GoldenElementXL

4322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 GoldenElementXL
Member since 2016 • 4322 Posts

@Mozelleple112 said:

@goldenelementxl: $100 GPU vs $1500 GPU. I would expect at least 7x the performance, if not 15

I wouldn't play Cyberpunk on a 2080Ti either.

I paid $1199 for mine. And every one I've built with cost around that same price too. Not sure where your $1500 is coming from.

So you're not playing Cyberpunk at all then???

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

40127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#65 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 40127 Posts

@gifford38 said:

no you need a series x to have games that are full raytracing and still have 60fps because its 12 teraflops.

even the most expensive gpu can't do it but some how the series x will. according to everyone here in system wars.

Who said the Series X will be running ray tracing at 60FPS? Since you claim everyone on the system wars then a quote with link should be easy.