Germany should still be paying war reparations.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
My virus infected game folder with missing files disagrees. :PA used digital game makes no sense. The idea of it being sued is that someone already used it and wore it down passed the brand new original pristine condition.
A Digital game gets no wear and tear
seanmcloughlin
If it is as simple as selling your serial key for each game, then you shouldn't need Steam to provide a method or service to do so. It's like forcing Steam to make a GameStop when Microsoft and Sony don't have to.SO much ignorance, I love steam but this should happen, it's far form impossible, just sell your serial key for each game, it would work perfectly.
Eddie-Vedder
The only way this would work is if it worked similarly to the way the trading card system currently works. I doubt they would let people write offtheir games for cheap, as it would create to much competition on their own platform, which would also hurt the devs (which might then turn against the service in general). Steam would have to have control of the pricing, as well as take a huge cut of what you make off of the sale. Why would ANYONE buy a digital copy of a game "new" when you can buy it "used" from someone else?
If it is as simple as selling your serial key for each game, then you shouldn't need Steam to provide a method or service to do so. It's like forcing Steam to make a GameStop when Microsoft and Sony don't have to.[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]
SO much ignorance, I love steam but this should happen, it's far form impossible, just sell your serial key for each game, it would work perfectly.
MajorPain10
Steam has to deactivate the serial and allow it to be reactivated on another account, that's pretty much it.
[QUOTE="heeweesRus"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]lolgermany loleuropeclyde46lol europoor lol Amerifat. lol ameridumb as well.
It won´t lead to anything. Used sales are imposible in digital format. Period.
Even if they succeed in Germany (very small chance), it won´t be applied worldwide.
Besides, didn´t German court dismiss before other similar cases from the same activist group ? I have heard that this is not their 1st attempt in fabricating a case.
jhonMalcovich
Yes they did, but last year The European Court of Justice ruled that digitally distributed software can be resold as used. The Court ruled that a copyright holder loses all distribution rights the moment it sells a copy of its software to the customer no matter what the license agreement says.
Source
lol europoor[QUOTE="heeweesRus"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]lolgermany loleuropeSchnabbleTab
That's coming from a Russian. :lol:
I'm Russian?LOL[QUOTE="percech"]
Germany > Murrica. Smarter people, better technology, and better human rights.
blue_hazy_basic
Anyways this is not a place to discuss politics people.
I've lived in Both Germany and the United States and I know for a fact that Germany has better human rights than the US. A friend of mine hasn't been to a dentist for over 5 years because he can't affordt it, in Germany no matter how poor someone is, they can always see a doctor/dentist/lawyer etc.
[QUOTE="SchnabbleTab"]
[QUOTE="heeweesRus"]lol europoorheeweesRus
That's coming from a Russian. :lol:
I'm Russian?
Sure, why not.
Digital reselling would destroy PC Software industry faster than global worldwide piracy. it would be super great for the consumer, but it would be disastrous for publishers and developers to the point they would completely cease making digital content. Or they would just price it 5 times as expensive.
jhonMalcovich
It's this type of thinking that is eroding the games industry. Having a game available used HELPS the games industry, because it makes the product more appealing. If you know that you won't be married to a game after you buy it, you are more likely to make the initial purchase. It's the same thing in principle as the car industry. Do you honestly think that the car industry would benefit from an outright ban on used car sales? Are video games immune from this type of thinking? Why?
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]lolgermany loleuropeRR360DD
:lol: Americans.
lolgermany loleurope lolamerica. Happy?
You forgot lolcanada.
If we could freely trade, and sell our digital games to other people over Steam then I'm pretty certain that would do a drastic amount of damage to the PC gaming industry.
There is absolutely no wear, and tear done to a digital copy when I use it, nor are there any shipping fees, or other obstacles to go through to get my game to someone else as there is with a retail version.
Maybe you could trade a game back in to Valve/developer for a credit towards a future game purchase, or something, but I don't know about outright having a used games market on the PC with the current system.
Ly_the_Fairy
I definitely sympathize with this argument. A digital used game is technically possible but has a lot of differences with stuff we normally consider to be "used".
A fair compromise would be to allow publishers to get some percentage of cost of re-sale. If the games industry is smart they will push for this type of system.
[QUOTE="uninspiredcup"]
Germany should still be paying war reparations.
GD1551
Pretty sure they are.
I think they paid them off a couple years ago.
[QUOTE="percech"]
Germany > Murrica. Smarter people, better technology, and better human rights.
ReadingRainbow4
And textbooks that completely glance over world war 2. lol.
You mean America? Because Germanies textbooks are full of WW2 stuff, they're not hiding their past like some other countries here.
Even though I want it there is a problem with this.
Unlike physical goods, trading digital data is so much easier. You can sell your game to someone in China for example in an instant. That means the same game will go in a hundred hands easily.
Plus unlike physical goods they don't wear down and deteriorate the more they're used.
Without any sort of regulations this will hurt developers, more than trading discs.
I'm sure it's already been said but if they allow people to sell their digital games on Steam then goodbye Steam sales, it just means that anyone could buy a game during the sale for dirt cheap, then sell it off after the sale ends for more.
I'm sure it's already been said but if they allow people to sell their digital games on Steam then goodbye Steam sales, it just means that anyone could buy a game during the sale for dirt cheap, then sell it off after the sale ends for more.
EtherealMachine
People do that all the time, instead of selling it on Steam they sell it on Amazon and E-bay.
[QUOTE="parkurtommo"]You sell the activation code with it. Which in turn means you can't play that games once you sell it. i see no real issue with it because it's a BETTER STRATEGY than full DRM DD. the problem with it though is many games activate a seperate account, on like uplay or origin even. so you can't even just sell the key, the infrastructure just isn't there once the key is out its pointless to be able to sell.That would be dificult to organize.
NationProtector
If it is as simple as selling your serial key for each game, then you shouldn't need Steam to provide a method or service to do so. It's like forcing Steam to make a GameStop when Microsoft and Sony don't have to.[QUOTE="MajorPain10"]
[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]
SO much ignorance, I love steam but this should happen, it's far form impossible, just sell your serial key for each game, it would work perfectly.
GD1551
Steam has to deactivate the serial and allow it to be reactivated on another account, that's pretty much it.
The only real major concern in this case would be the price model and how people are able to sell their "used" game.[QUOTE="AzatiS"]Germany making Europe a mess the last 5 years or so ... Why not mess up with video gaming and digital shopping as well ?!! They are used to do such things.percechIt's not Germany's fault that countries like Greece and Spain are such fails.
And guess what? These bailouts Germany gave completly broke those countries you mentioned due to borrowing costs.
However I do like the idea of used sales in steam
no they are not. steam is already allowing users to sell items via a marketplace. a similar thing could be done with games. however it would take a lot of time probably 6 months to develop and another 6 to roll out successfully. the groundwork is there but effort needs to be done to ensure that once sold that game and its files leave your PC permanentlyIt won´t lead to anything. Used sales are imposible in digital format. Period.
Even if they succeed in Germany (very small chance), it won´t be applied worldwide.
Besides, didn´t German court dismiss before other similar cases from the same activist group ? I have heard that this is not their 1st attempt in fabricating a case.
jhonMalcovich
Technically I doubt it, the trading system is already there. In terms of licensing, that's the problem.That would be dificult to organize.
parkurtommo
You're horrendously wrong. From Amazon's borrowing system to Greenman Gaming's sellback or even Stream's trading. It's possible as far as technology and account binding is concerned - no one is budging because there's been little legal pressure.It won´t lead to anything. Used sales are imposible in digital format. Period.
Even if they succeed in Germany (very small chance), it won´t be applied worldwide.
Besides, didn´t German court dismiss before other similar cases from the same activist group ? I have heard that this is not their 1st attempt in fabricating a case.
jhonMalcovich
lolgermany loleuropeRR360DD
Yeh , screw them and their consumer rights , who needs mandatory 2 year warranty's or rights to sell what you paid for .
They should be lubed up like you guys !
Not !
The biggest issue here is companies will lose money which in turn will kill the major steam sales many love. If you can buy a game for the price it cost to rent why would you even want to sell it?wooooodeNot sure how this will work (if it happens) but they could do a model like with the trading cards where steam takes some of the money from each sale, that way some of the money could be given to the developer as well as valve.
How would that work for games that use third party applications like GFWL, Uplay, EA, etc.? Would the seller be forced to sell those accounts along with the game? Some games probably won't give you 100% of the entire game unless you purchase the game new (not including multiplayer).
Without regarding consumer rights and whatnot for a second, if this goes through, I feel like that future Steam sales will be indefinitely stricter, even though it shouldn't. Since money is involved, something may change. It's nice that people would have more freedom to do what they want with the games, but I don't want it to affect future sales. I like my "$10 for an entire game franchise" bundles.
[QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]
[QUOTE="percech"]
Germany > Murrica. Smarter people, better technology, and better human rights.
SchnabbleTab
And textbooks that completely glance over world war 2. lol.
You mean America? Because Germanies textbooks are full of WW2 stuff, they're not hiding their past like some other countries here.
American textbooks glance over the Eugenics because they don't want to be blamed for inspiring Hitler :lol:[QUOTE="LazySloth718"]This. If Valve were to lose they'd just leave Germany. Who wins then "consumer rights" group? Not saying I disagree or anything but if I remember correctly, Not only are they one of the larger PC markets, but this ruling if won would encompass the entirety of the EU. That being said, Digital items are far from impervious to trade. A $100 piece of software, digital or otherwise isn't going to stay $100 forever. Time and competition will gradually bring the price down regardless of whether you can keep it on a disk or a hard drive as either a better version or more competitors arrive. My problem is, that the trading still doesn't get rid of my biggest issues personally(mandated steam) and #2 if not implemented carefully will destroy the industry.Licenses and use-rights are bought and sold on open markets all the time.
You're not buying the game, you're buying a right to play the game.
blue_hazy_basic
If Rome 2 is going for 39.99, but players are selling their copies for an average of say $25, this would put the publisher at a HUGE disadvantage. So the only difference would be who you want you give your money to, the CA/Sega or Bobdeathmachine2000. Digital trade would otherwise need to be extremely regulated as far as pricing goes between both steam and other storefronts as well as publishers to ensure that the abuse of cheap digital copies from users doesn't add an unnecessary layer of stress in sales. There needs to be some stopper, for example that says, "The minimum amount players can charge for a digital copy of their game must be equivalent to the current price of the game on the market".
If Rome 2 is 39.99, then you could not sell your game for anything less than 39.99
But again, highly finicky.
There will cease to be steam sales if this goes through, whether that's for the best or worse.GhoXWhy? If there's a cut going towards publishers or the distributor that doesn't make any sense, let alone how many licenses are sold during sale periods. As with retail, markdowns and sales aren't affected by preowned sales.
Source?Valve won a similar suit last year. This will go nowhere.
StormyJoe
LOL[QUOTE="percech"]
Germany > Murrica. Smarter people, better technology, and better human rights.
blue_hazy_basic
Anyways this is not a place to discuss politics people.
The only thing lolworthy is America's health care system. Sorry, you're too poor for a doctor.At least it gives us Breaking Bad.
Nah, the EU is crazy. They made MS sell a version of the OS that didn't support MP3s and another where the had to advertise for Netscape. They are very anti-successful business.It won´t lead to anything. Used sales are imposible in digital format. Period.
Even if they succeed in Germany (very small chance), it won´t be applied worldwide.
Besides, didn´t German court dismiss before other similar cases from the same activist group ? I have heard that this is not their 1st attempt in fabricating a case.
jhonMalcovich
People are idiots.
There should be no re-sale for digital content through Steam, period. If you cannot afford to pay full price then wait until it is cheap, Steam provides content for ALL budgets.
To feel you should, by law, be able to re-sell something you don't actually own when you have taken value from the service YOU AGREED TO in the first place is entitlement at it's worst.
Steam provides an advertising platform for developers, it provides a digital locker for you to download your game as many times as you wish and 'store' it on the Steam servers when you don't. They allow you to install it on as many devices as you wish, play offline and provide a host of features to discuss the game or seek technical support for the game and all in an easy to use platform. This platform provides integrated chat, friends lists, achievements, cloud synching (save games and settings), integration for modding and so on.
This adds value to your digital purchase, it is why people choose Steam over other services. To then ask to re-sell the content you probably bought for peanuts anyway is ridiculous. If you can't afford a few bucks for a game or can't wait a couple of months for it to become a few bucks then you have bigger issues than used game sales/value.
/rant off.
*Edit* Game sharing is different, a very cool idea and would lead to more sales in the long run i'm sure.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment