Can You Run Crysis Challenge

[QUOTE="elbow2k"]

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.0Ghz

Evga 8800GTS 640MB

nippon_gamer

thats probably why ur never gonna get a 360 right?

Quad Core 2.4 GHZ , Evga 8800 GTS , 3GB 800 MHZ RAM

And I got a 360 :P

Intel Quad Core QX6700

EVGA 8800GTX 768mb

Mixture of Very High/High Settings.

Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.8Ghz

2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2

MSI Geforce 8600GTS OC-edition

mix of medium/high settings at 1280x720 30fps.

Edit: I have a 360 and Wii =P

yeah, Quad Core 2.4 GHz

2 XFX 8800GT 8800GT 512 MB

E6600

8800 GTX

Ran at 1920x1200 on very high until the last few levels. Last level with the final boss forced me to reduce graphics a lot though. WAY too much stuff going on graphically. Fire, NPCs, Waves, Explosions, Giant textured models, Physics all over the place, and me swearing left and right at wtf is going on. Was great!

7900GS, 2 gigs DDR2 ram, Pentium D 945 dual core processor 3.4ghz High at a constant 45 FPS. Of course, I haven't even bought the full retail version yet. Been too busy playing other games.Vandalvideo

High at 45fps with those specs? You must be running it at 800 x 600 or even lower, unless your lying.

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]7900GS, 2 gigs DDR2 ram, Pentium D 945 dual core processor 3.4ghz High at a constant 45 FPS. Of course, I haven't even bought the full retail version yet. Been too busy playing other games.Truffle-Shuffle

High at 45fps with those specs? You must be running it at 800 x 600 or even lower, unless your lying.

[QUOTE="Truffle-Shuffle"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]7900GS, 2 gigs DDR2 ram, Pentium D 945 dual core processor 3.4ghz High at a constant 45 FPS. Of course, I haven't even bought the full retail version yet. Been too busy playing other games.Vandalvideo

High at 45fps with those specs? You must be running it at 800 x 600 or even lower, unless your lying.

Well your not running everything at high then

Well your not running everything at high thenTruffle-Shuffle

Specs. In Signature

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Truffle-Shuffle"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]7900GS, 2 gigs DDR2 ram, Pentium D 945 dual core processor 3.4ghz High at a constant 45 FPS. Of course, I haven't even bought the full retail version yet. Been too busy playing other games.Truffle-Shuffle

High at 45fps with those specs? You must be running it at 800 x 600 or even lower, unless your lying.

Well your not running everything at high then

Pentium D sucks. You're right, he's not running at high. Prob. 1280x720, or similar res. at medium to low.

Tweaking or not. Pentium D, with that graphics card is not going anywhere with Crysis. I'm sure he can play it but at what cost.

Yup, at 30 frames on high settings, with a few Very High ones like 3d waves and god rays on.

e6400 OC'ed to 2.4, 8800GT and 2 GB ram.

A lot of people are just going to vote no or technicallly yes just to flame on PC gaming.... or because they aren't even PC gamers... Better thread would be in PC Games not here.... Kind of pointless. Well I can run it on my laptop, not my desktop but I don't even use my desktop anymore because I'm going to be building a new one. My specs:

Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz T7700, Geforce 8600m, 2GB Ram, and Vista Utlimate. I think that's everything...

D sucks. You're right, he's not running at high. Prob. 1280x720, or similar res. at medium to low.Tweaking or not. Pentium D, with that graphics card is not going anywhere with Crysis. I'm sure he can play it but at what cost.DevilMightCry

[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]D sucks. You're right, he's not running at high. Prob. 1280x720, or similar res. at medium to low.Tweaking or not. Pentium D, with that graphics card is not going anywhere with Crysis. I'm sure he can play it but at what cost.Vandalvideo

What?? NO Pentium D can compete with a C2D Vandal. The C2D is simply much more efficient processor. Period.

And people with tweaked rigs with 8800 cards and quad cores are getting about the frames you claim to be getting. A 7900 GS just can't do that.

Here, I popped an e6600 against your Pentium D. Let's see the results ;

http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=887&model2=877&chart=421

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]D sucks. You're right, he's not running at high. Prob. 1280x720, or similar res. at medium to low.Tweaking or not. Pentium D, with that graphics card is not going anywhere with Crysis. I'm sure he can play it but at what cost.TheCrazed420

What?? NO Pentium D can compete with a C2D Vandal. The C2D is simply much more efficient processor. Period.

And people with tweaked rigs with 8800 cards and quad cores are getting about the frames you claim to be getting. A 7900 GS just can't do that.

[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]D sucks. You're right, he's not running at high. Prob. 1280x720, or similar res. at medium to low.Tweaking or not. Pentium D, with that graphics card is not going anywhere with Crysis. I'm sure he can play it but at what cost.Vandalvideo

What?? NO Pentium D can compete with a C2D Vandal. The C2D is simply much more efficient processor. Period.

And people with tweaked rigs with 8800 cards and quad cores are getting about the frames you claim to be getting. A 7900 GS just can't do that.

All right. Being more specific with your tweaks , you may be right. Object detail on low helps a lot, as well as no shadows. By lower lighting, do you mean shaders on medium? Then its definitely believable. But no longer running on high, really. And having no shadows is definitely losing graphical fidelity.

[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]D sucks. You're right, he's not running at high. Prob. 1280x720, or similar res. at medium to low.Tweaking or not. Pentium D, with that graphics card is not going anywhere with Crysis. I'm sure he can play it but at what cost.Vandalvideo

What?? NO Pentium D can compete with a C2D Vandal. The C2D is simply much more efficient processor. Period.

And people with tweaked rigs with 8800 cards and quad cores are getting about the frames you claim to be getting. A 7900 GS just can't do that.

Know any basic guides to do this?

My game chugs even on High now for some reason ( 8800 GTS 640 ) 3 GB , Q6600 Normal.

Thats at 1280 x 1020 instead of my native 1650 x 1050 even :( ... dunno what happened, was pretty fine before.

All right. Being more specific with your tweaks , you may be right. Object detail on low helps a lot, as well as no shadows. By lower lighting, do you mean shaders on medium? Then its definitely believable. But no longer running on high, really.TheCrazed420

Have you seen this guide Meu2k7?

http://www.tweakguides.com/Crysis_1.html

[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"]All right. Being more specific with your tweaks , you may be right. Object detail on low helps a lot, as well as no shadows. By lower lighting, do you mean shaders on medium? Then its definitely believable. But no longer running on high, really.Vandalvideo

Well one things for certain, Crysis is probably the most tweakable game in PC gaming history, so anything is possible.

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="TheCrazed420"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"].Meu2k7

Know any basic guides to do this?

My game chugs even on High now for some reason ( 8800 GTS 640 ) 3 GB , Q6600 Normal.

Thats at 1280 x 1020 instead of my native 1650 x 1050 even :( ... dunno what happened, was pretty fine before.

Cuban's Custom Crysis Configs (CCC) [Triple "C" Pack] VERSION 1.2

http://www.incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=14544

7900GS, 2 gigs DDR2 ram, Pentium D 945 dual core processor 3.4ghz High at a constant 45 FPS. Of course, I haven't even bought the full retail version yet. Been too busy playing other games.Vandalvideo

edit: nevermind

Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

EVGA 512MB 8800GTS (G92)

[QUOTE="elbow2k"]

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.0Ghz

Evga 8800GTS 640MB

nippon_gamer

thats probably why ur never gonna get a 360 right?

like him over there.. and i got a 360.. love'em both!

Runs smooth everything is on max:

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700

2 pieces of XFX Geforce 8800 GTX Ultra

4 GB of Ram

AMD 2800+ and a Rdeon 9550.

That's a big fat negatory, commander.

video card: Gefroce 8800GTX

amd x2 2.8

i run it on very high

AMD Athlon X2 5200+ geforce 8500GT 256 MB, Yes I can, the experience is smooth, with everything on high except shadows volumetric clouds and shaders which are at medium or low.

EDIT: I play at 960x600 resolution.

[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]D sucks. You're right, he's not running at high. Prob. 1280x720, or similar res. at medium to low.Tweaking or not. Pentium D, with that graphics card is not going anywhere with Crysis. I'm sure he can play it but at what cost.Vandalvideo

First off, the 7900GS is pretty much dead even with ATi's X1950 Pro. The strongest DX9 contender, is ATI's 1950 XTX, which I am using, simply put. And 99% of the reviews agree with me.

P4 2.95 Ghz , 1 Gig 333Mhz ram (I bought what I thought was 2Gig 667, but I guess thats what happens when you buy stuff really cheap from an unauthorized dealer. one of my ram sticks stopped working)

and x1950 Pro 256Mb.

I could run the demo on all medium, a couple high, and high physics with playable framerates (around 25). I was surprised actually.

Yes...barely

Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2.4 ghz

Geforce 7600 GT @ 580 mhz

YES

2 Nvidia8800gtx SLI

Asus Striker Extreme mobo

4 gigs ddr2 ram

Core 2 duo 3.0ghz.

EAT THAT!

Pentium D = E6600 in Real World Performance?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA