No, I'm done with fallout.
I was already done with the series after Fallout 4.
It looks like Fallout 4 graphics and I don't really know how to play the game, so I can't say I'm hyped. An online Fallout does interest me a little though, so I'll just wait for feedback from people who've played it before deciding if I should get it.
Well I'll let you know how it goes!
It's also their lowest scoring game of all time, both critic and especially user scores. It got trampled in GOTYs and score by Witcher 3. That doesn't usually happen for a BGS game.
Settlements blew man, half assed system an excuse they used to keep the world have almost no real towns.
If we're going by Metacritic pro reviews, the Fallout 4 PC and New Vegas PC are essentially tied at 84. Fallout 3 got a 91. Yet, many would say New Vegas was the best among the three.
NV isn't a BGS game. It's Obsidian, it got low scores due to bugs galore.
FO4 is the first BGS release that didn't sweep the GOTYs and MC and be the absolute biggest game of the year. Witcher 3 obliterated it. (not discussing sales). Its not even on any top 10 lists like all their other games are.
Since it's always online and has PVP, there's a 95% chance it won't have any mod support. Without mod support, Bethesda games are boring as hell, so no, not hyped at all.
NV isn't a BGS game. It's Obsidian, it got low scores due to bugs galore.
FO4 is the first BGS release that didn't sweep the GOTYs and MC and be the absolute biggest game of the year. Witcher 3 obliterated it. (not discussing sales). Its not even on any top 10 lists like all their other games are.
Personally, if I was in Bethesda's shoes, I'll take hard cold cash over scores and awards. I find forking money over as the best vote of confidence. I can heap all kinds of praise on a game. In the end, they're just words. On the other hand, money is money.
Flight Simulator X is my favorite game of last gen and it never garnered high scores or awards. But, I'll take it over any of the Top 10 games in Metacritic.
Fallout 4 was a disappointment, and while I am intrigued as to how they're going to handle multiplayer, I don't trust buggy-ass Bethesda to do an online thing.
Fallout 4 was BGS's worst game of all time and one of the main reasons was due to the horrific settlement system.
Now FO76 is all about building shit and is a RUST clone for the most part.
What do you think?
Yet, Fallout 4 is now Bethesda's best-selling game, topping even Skyrim.
It's also their lowest scoring game of all time, both critic and especially user scores. It got trampled in GOTYs and score by Witcher 3. That doesn't usually happen for a BGS game.
Settlements blew man, half assed system an excuse they used to keep the world have almost no real towns.
Are you stupid? just cause you don't like Fallout 4 maybe you should get your shit straight.
Fallout 4 is one of the highest rated Beth games (AND Fallout games). On Metacritic Fallout 4 is at a
PS4- 87/X1-88/PC-84, now lets look at the other Fallout and Beth games
Fallout NV PC-84/360-84/PS3-82
Fallout PC-89
Fallout 2 PC-86
Fallout Shelter PC-69
Fallout 3 PC-91/360-93/PS3-90
Fallout Brother Hood of Steel PS3-64/Xbox-66
Godrim PC-94/Switch-84/360-96/PS3-92/PS4-81 (SE)
ESO PC-71/PS4-74/X1-77
Oblivion PS3-93/PC-94/360-94
Morrowind PC-93/Xbox- 87 (88 for the Goty edition)
There's no actual rating for the first two TES games. So going by that Fallout 4 would be better than 4 Fallout games (inc NV) and better than one TES game (almost two with Morrowind)
Fallout 4 was BGS's worst game of all time and one of the main reasons was due to the horrific settlement system.
Now FO76 is all about building shit and is a RUST clone for the most part.
What do you think?
Yet, Fallout 4 is now Bethesda's best-selling game, topping even Skyrim.
It's also their lowest scoring game of all time, both critic and especially user scores. It got trampled in GOTYs and score by Witcher 3. That doesn't usually happen for a BGS game.
Settlements blew man, half assed system an excuse they used to keep the world have almost no real towns.
Are you stupid?
Are you? Bethesda Games Studio (which made the below games) did not make New Vegas and BoS. That was Obsidian and Interplay.
Idiot.
Skyrim - 94%. http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim
Oblivion - 94% http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion
Fallout 3 - 91% http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-3
Morrowind - 89% http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-3
Fallout 4 - 84% http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-4
Also I'm only using the objectively best version of these games. We get the same results at other popular aggregates like Game Rankings, with FO4 as BGS's worst game.
Then lets not even get into user scores across most aggregates. 5.5/10 and 6/10 across the 2 biggest aggregates, with a sample size of over 200k. The average gamer finds the game is significantly worse than the 4 other BGS titles.
Settlements sucked.
Fallout 4 was BGS's worst game of all time and one of the main reasons was due to the horrific settlement system.
Now FO76 is all about building shit and is a RUST clone for the most part.
What do you think?
Yet, Fallout 4 is now Bethesda's best-selling game, topping even Skyrim.
It's also their lowest scoring game of all time, both critic and especially user scores. It got trampled in GOTYs and score by Witcher 3. That doesn't usually happen for a BGS game.
Settlements blew man, half assed system an excuse they used to keep the world have almost no real towns.
Are you stupid?
Are you? Bethesda Games Studio (which made the below games) did not make New Vegas and BoS. That was Obsidian and Interplay.
Idiot.
Skyrim - 94%.http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim
Oblivion - 94%http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion
Fallout 3 - 91%http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-3
Morrowind - 89%http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-3
Fallout 4 - 84%http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-4
Also I'm only using the objectively best version of these games. We get the same results at other popular aggregates like Game Rankings, with FO4 as BGS's worst game.
Then lets not even get into user scores across most aggregates. 5.5/10 and 6/10 across the 2 biggest aggregates, with a sample size of over 200k. The average gamer finds the game is significantly worse than the 4 other BGS titles.
Settlements sucked.
K you just proved you're stupid.
Going by Metacritic Skyrims highest rating is a 96% (360), Fallout 3 highest rating is a 93% (360), Morrowind is a 93% on PC (your dumbass even linked the wrong game, you linked Fallout 3 like a pleb) and Fallout 4 is at a 88% (X1).
First off I give zero shits NV was made by Obsidian (which ironically Bethesda still helped make it), the internet has a complete hard on for NV saying it's the best Fallout game. Oh you want to bring game rankings on this, Fallout 4 is at a 89.79% (X1), the lowest "Bethesda" Fallout game is Shelter at 72.04% (ios). Then going by GR Fallout 3 would be the highest Fallout game at a 92.85% (sorry but I'm going by the more than 1-5 reviews BS they have on there) which is 3% more than Fallout 4
It's also their lowest scoring game of all time, both critic and especially user scores. It got trampled in GOTYs and score by Witcher 3. That doesn't usually happen for a BGS game.
Settlements blew man, half assed system an excuse they used to keep the world have almost no real towns.
Are you stupid?
Are you? Bethesda Games Studio (which made the below games) did not make New Vegas and BoS. That was Obsidian and Interplay.
Idiot.
Skyrim - 94%.http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim
Oblivion - 94%http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion
Fallout 3 - 91%http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-3
Morrowind - 89%http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-3
Fallout 4 - 84%http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-4
Also I'm only using the objectively best version of these games. We get the same results at other popular aggregates like Game Rankings, with FO4 as BGS's worst game.
Then lets not even get into user scores across most aggregates. 5.5/10 and 6/10 across the 2 biggest aggregates, with a sample size of over 200k. The average gamer finds the game is significantly worse than the 4 other BGS titles.
Settlements sucked.
Going by Metacritic Skyrims highest rating is a 96% (360), Fallout 3 highest rating is a 93% (360), Morrowind is a 93% on PC (your dumbass even linked the wrong game, you linked Fallout 3 like a pleb) and Fallout 4 is at a 88% (X1).
Buffoon, Morrowind PC is 89%
http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-iii-morrowind
94 > 94 > 91 > 89 > 84 (FO4)
These are only the PC scores. As stated I will only bring up the best version of these games.
Fallout 4 is BSG's lowest scoring major retail release. This also holds up at https://www.gamerankings.com/ (check all 5 games at GR, same results). Furthermore, it is also the lowest user rated BGS game by a large margin at all user aggregates.
5.5/10 http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fallout-4/user-reviews
6/10 https://store.steampowered.com/app/377160/Fallout_4/
FO4 simply was not liked as much as all other major BGS retail games. It shows why when you play it.
Because I am. Don't get me wrong, though, I've never been an MMO type gamer. But I always told myself, being a fairly huge FO fan, that if I were ever to play an MMO, it would be if Bethesda made a Fallout MMO. And here we are. I seriously can't wait, so much so that I'm considering pre-ordering (which I never do) to get in on the beta. I was one of those gamers that loved the base building aspect of FO4, so to see that carried on in a bigger way, evidently, in FO76 has me drooling a bit. Also hearing that the world of FO76 is four times the size of FO4 has me hyped to the moon and back, as exploration is more or less my favorite thing to do in Fallout. I just hope Bethesda allows me to highlight my hair purple, so it can match my actual hair. Gonna be a purple-haired traveling heater merchant with an exceptionally itchy trigger finger. Or something like that. Ooooooh the possibilities.
So what about you guys? Yay? Nay? Somewhere in between?
Until they confirm if there is going to be actual private servers, i am not at all hyped for anything this badly done.
Definitely hyped and I've never even play a FO game before. Just picked up FO4 and will be starting it soon, though
New Fallout games are always exciting, and I am really excited about this, but only IF the single-player mode turns out to be as good as fallout 3 and 4. I fear that the multiplayer stuff will turn the game into mindless blow'em'up action.
I think there are no AI NPCs in the game. Unless I'm mistaken, the NPCs in Fallout 76 will be other players online.
That's why I'm skipping it. I'll wait for Fallout 5.
I think I would play this game. I didn't have much issue with the settlements feature. I liked the build em up aspects of it but not being the management of 20 settlements spread througout map. I watched lecagykillahd videos and people don't really seem to mind fallout 76.
When they finally revealed it, I lost most of my interest. The absence of AI NPCs made me worry that Fallout 76 would lack any worthwhile quests and story. After watching this documentary of Danny O'Dwyer's NoClip on the creation of the game however, I changed my mind. I'm interested to explore another huge Fallout world by Bethesda, and even do so with my friends. So not sure about a day 1 purchase but I'll definitely consider getting it after seeing the world's reactions to it.
I couldn't be less interested in an online Fallout game. It's not even a fully fledged MMO (which might have been more interesting) it's just oh look you can walk around in Fallout 4 with a few friends. Sounds lame to me.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment