@Juub1990 said:
>8K graphics
You seriously believe that?
That tomshardware i sure as hell don't think they believe that.
@rmpumper said:
Lol @ peasants who expect 8K60 with raytraycing. How dense do you have to be to believe bs like that. It will be as follows:
- 8K video output (even 1050Ti has 8K support)
- 1080p30/60 raytrayced gameplay
- 4k30/60 raster gameplay
I don't think anyone here has fell for that,in fact read the responses here and you will see.
@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:
When you think about it the IPC gains from Zen 2 will be lost due lower frequencies so that Zen 2 8 core chip at 3.2GHz will actually no better than a Ryzen 1700 in raw gaming performance so any Ryzen 1700X/16GB RAM and a Vega 56 level GPU or higher is going to give you PS5 performance which now can be made for $800 and the PS5 isn't going to be out till late 2020 or even 2021.
The only difference is no PC gamer is going to use a Vega 56 for 4K and these console gamer's think its enough to run 8K let alone 4K/60 unless its that rare game that runs well or is designed to run at higher framerates like COD, BF or a Racing game there is little to no chance of getting 4K/60 especially if it means the developer has to lower the settings in a era where graphics sell.
Please point at the people who think here that the PS5 will run games at 8k..
This is damage control for something no one has claim, wow you hermits sure are an insecure bunch..lol
The are IPC improvements on ryzen 2 like cache latency improvements that would surely help even at lower frequency.
But even if there was no advantage over Ryzen 1700 damn dude that CPU run circles around the shitty jaguar inside the PS4 and xbox one and it should make for quite a boost.
Hell most PC gamers are not on vega 56 level of performance and you know it.
Log in to comment