What edition of Windows do you have? Comparisons?

  • 115 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Sentinel672002
Sentinel672002

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Sentinel672002
Member since 2004 • 1585 Posts

Hmm, when is Windows 7 supposed to debut?

pseudonymph24

Second half of 2009...

http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/msh/?p=165

Avatar image for Sentinel672002
Sentinel672002

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Sentinel672002
Member since 2004 • 1585 Posts
[QUOTE="Trilvester"][QUOTE="Sentinel672002"]

Current OSes = XP Professional SP2, XP Home SP2 and Windows 2000.

The difference? XP can utilize quad cores, W2K can't. Thats about it. Performance-wise they're similar, though XP is more of a memory hog. XP Pro is better than XP Home at utilizing quads, so I keep the XP Home on my laptop (Pent M). Vista? I'm waiting for Windows 7. :roll:

Past OSes = DOS 6.0, DOS 6.22, Windows 3.1, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 98SE...

Bottom-line? Non-GUI OSes make me use my brain more...thank God for DOSSHELL... LOL!!! :lol:

Spybot_9

Does Pro really utilize quad cores better? I got a free XP pro disc from my school thats just sitting on my desk? You think it would be worth it to upgrade to pro from home?

Eh....windows XP home will utilize quads as good as vista ultimate.Why would you think that it wont?

I'd read that XP Home edition, while it could utilize quad cores, did so less efficiently than XP Pro. However, after looking for it, I can't find my original source of this info. Disregard my earlier comment about XP Home and quads...at least until I can find the comparison again...

Avatar image for gm84
gm84

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 gm84
Member since 2008 • 350 Posts

Current - XP Pro SP2 on an ancient laptop.

Past - Dos 6.0, Windows 3.1,95,98, 98SE, 2000Me (?)

Future - Windows 7 on a nice gaming rig !

Avatar image for pseudonymph24
pseudonymph24

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 pseudonymph24
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts

Windows Vista Home Edition 64-bitDavyvfr

What are your specs and how is your Vista running? Misha @ avadirect is suggesting I get Vista with my new rig...

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="andyroo08"][QUOTE="pseudonymph24"]

[QUOTE="roulettethedog"]I have xp home on my 160 gig drive and 32 bit Vista home premium on my 250 gig drive. Vista crashed after a power outage and I had to reformat both drives.:P I didn't back up stuff, but I still like Vista and use that drive almost 99% of the time.pseudonymph24

I was under the impression all Vista was 64-bit, no?

Just like XP, there is both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Vista, i'm using vista ultimate 32-bit.

Oh okay, cool. How do you like it so far? I keep hearing Vista is a resource hog, but with 4gigs, it shouldn't be a problem, right?

it runs just like xp with 2gb and dual core

Avatar image for triggs1957
triggs1957

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 triggs1957
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
I have the march 2008 release of Windows XP PRO vista ultamet edition service pack 3, It has the new Sata/Raid drivers and microsoft becouse people were switching back to XP put the sounds,style, and newest ver. of all programs like IE.WMP and winrar allong with a revamped xp pro
Avatar image for blooddrunk
blooddrunk

1036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 blooddrunk
Member since 2008 • 1036 Posts

[QUOTE="Davyvfr"]Windows Vista Home Edition 64-bitpseudonymph24

What are your specs and how is your Vista running? Misha @ avadirect is suggesting I get Vista with my new rig...

if its a new rig you maya s well get4 gigs of ram and vista premium

Avatar image for RazorGR
RazorGR

1605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 RazorGR
Member since 2005 • 1605 Posts

I use Vista Ultimate SP1. My desktop performance is generally faster than in XP and my games run about the same as in XP.

I keep hearing people complaining about Vista being a resource-hog which is not true. While it does use more RAM than XP (you can always strip it down to the essentials though) it's not as bad as they claim. Vista has this little feature called superfetch which on it's own can take up a large part of your available memory to improve performance by loading the applications you use the most in the RAM. That's why many people often see their memory usage over 1GB even with hardly any programs running. That way Vista makes use of the otherwise useless available memory when you don't need it. When you run a demanding application or a game, that used memory will be available should you need it.

Avatar image for chadw_genx
chadw_genx

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 chadw_genx
Member since 2005 • 229 Posts

I got vista home premimum. It looks pretty, and daily operations are not bad. But the biggest drawback is that Vista doesn't run KOTOR or KOTOR II period. I have tried for a year using every method I can think of, but KOTOR still doesn't run.wow1059

I have KOTOR II on my Vista 32-bit Business OS and it runs just fine. Try patching the game and/or your video card drivers.

The truth about MS Vista: I used to bash this software constantly. I wondered why they had to revamp the GUI and make permissions set so tight. The truth is, since I've owned Vista, I haven't received a single piece of malware. Not one virus, not one worm, trojan, spyware, or piece of adware. I have scanned with 4 different virus and spyware scanners on many occassions and never gotten a piece of malware.

In addition Vista is extremely stable on my machine. The only time I ever received a lockup or BSOD was when I overclocked my RAM insanely high. Vista SP1 is the best MS OS that has ever been released by leaps and bounds. It is much less of a resource hog than it used to be and while games may run a tad bit slower because Vista uses a tad bit more resident memory, this can be completely bypassed by turning the Windows Aero interface off. Vista will no longer look so pretty but will use about the same amount of resources as XP, only with Direct X 10 and a more stable OS.

Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :D

Avatar image for mike4realz
mike4realz

2577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 mike4realz
Member since 2003 • 2577 Posts
Vista Ultimatum 32-bits and pieces
Avatar image for luamhtrad
luamhtrad

1997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 luamhtrad
Member since 2003 • 1997 Posts

Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :Dchadw_genx

Longhorn was Vista's development codename. The development codename for Windows 7, is Vienna.

Avatar image for mike4realz
mike4realz

2577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 mike4realz
Member since 2003 • 2577 Posts
Microsoft's Vienna Sausages
Avatar image for pseudonymph24
pseudonymph24

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 pseudonymph24
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts
[QUOTE="pseudonymph24"]

[QUOTE="Davyvfr"]Windows Vista Home Edition 64-bitblooddrunk

What are your specs and how is your Vista running? Misha @ avadirect is suggesting I get Vista with my new rig...

if its a new rig you maya s well get4 gigs of ram and vista premium

What I'm most worried about is my Sims 2 game and all its expansions not playing well on Vista 64-bit. I read many reviews of people who tried to play on a Vista 64-bit system and promptly switched back to XP due to some issues. I'm not sure if it's more a Sims 2 problem or more of a problem with the specs people are using.

Avatar image for luamhtrad
luamhtrad

1997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 luamhtrad
Member since 2003 • 1997 Posts

Microsoft's Vienna Sausagesmike4realz

Kid in your sig loves sausages.

Avatar image for luamhtrad
luamhtrad

1997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 luamhtrad
Member since 2003 • 1997 Posts
[QUOTE="blooddrunk"][QUOTE="pseudonymph24"]

[QUOTE="Davyvfr"]Windows Vista Home Edition 64-bitpseudonymph24

What are your specs and how is your Vista running? Misha @ avadirect is suggesting I get Vista with my new rig...

if its a new rig you maya s well get4 gigs of ram and vista premium

What I'm most worried about is my Sims 2 game and all its expansions not playing well on Vista 64-bit. I read many reviews of people who tried to play on a Vista 64-bit system and promptly switched back to XP due to some issues. I'm not sure if it's more a Sims 2 problem or more of a problem with the specs people are using.

If you do have issues, you can always try running them in XP compatability mode. Also, functioning drivers are crucial to normal operation in the 64-bit environment.

Avatar image for quietguy
quietguy

1218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 quietguy
Member since 2003 • 1218 Posts

[QUOTE="mike4realz"]Microsoft's Vienna Sausagesluamhtrad

Kid in your sig loves sausages.

I think he's more excited for those pair of meatballs sitting on the avatar spot.:D

Avatar image for pseudonymph24
pseudonymph24

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 pseudonymph24
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts
[QUOTE="pseudonymph24"][QUOTE="blooddrunk"][QUOTE="pseudonymph24"]

[QUOTE="Davyvfr"]Windows Vista Home Edition 64-bitluamhtrad

What are your specs and how is your Vista running? Misha @ avadirect is suggesting I get Vista with my new rig...

if its a new rig you maya s well get4 gigs of ram and vista premium

What I'm most worried about is my Sims 2 game and all its expansions not playing well on Vista 64-bit. I read many reviews of people who tried to play on a Vista 64-bit system and promptly switched back to XP due to some issues. I'm not sure if it's more a Sims 2 problem or more of a problem with the specs people are using.

If you do have issues, you can always try running them in XP compatability mode. Also, functioning drivers are crucial to normal operation in the 64-bit environment.

Thanks for the info. if I let them (Avadirect) install Vista, all my drivers should be up to date already...

Avatar image for luamhtrad
luamhtrad

1997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 luamhtrad
Member since 2003 • 1997 Posts
[QUOTE="luamhtrad"][QUOTE="pseudonymph24"][QUOTE="blooddrunk"][QUOTE="pseudonymph24"]

[QUOTE="Davyvfr"]Windows Vista Home Edition 64-bitpseudonymph24

What are your specs and how is your Vista running? Misha @ avadirect is suggesting I get Vista with my new rig...

if its a new rig you maya s well get4 gigs of ram and vista premium

What I'm most worried about is my Sims 2 game and all its expansions not playing well on Vista 64-bit. I read many reviews of people who tried to play on a Vista 64-bit system and promptly switched back to XP due to some issues. I'm not sure if it's more a Sims 2 problem or more of a problem with the specs people are using.

If you do have issues, you can always try running them in XP compatability mode. Also, functioning drivers are crucial to normal operation in the 64-bit environment.

Thanks for the info. if I let them (Avadirect) install Vista, all my drivers should be up to date already...

Yes. Very true. However, you should also make sure that your Sims games are installed in the correct order and fully patched before trying to run them. I assume that you already know this, but just wanted to throw it out there. :oops:

Avatar image for pseudonymph24
pseudonymph24

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 pseudonymph24
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts
Yes, I know, but good looking out anyway :). I install them in order, but I also patch every pack as needed before moving on to the next.
Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts

XP Pro (32bit) Student Ed. Service Pack 2 integrated.

Everything you want out of XP Pro minus the redundant crap in the regular XP Pro edition.

Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts
I have XP Pro sp2 (32bit) and Vista Premium (32bit). I play all my games on XP, it just works better for me.
Avatar image for pseudonymph24
pseudonymph24

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 pseudonymph24
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts

I have XP Pro sp2 (32bit) and Vista Premium (32bit). I play all my games on XP, it just works better for me.--Anna--

How much ram do you have installed?

Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]I have XP Pro sp2 (32bit) and Vista Premium (32bit). I play all my games on XP, it just works better for me.pseudonymph24

.

How much ram do you have installed?

2GB for XP and 4Gb for Vista.
Avatar image for blackleather223
blackleather223

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 blackleather223
Member since 2004 • 1569 Posts

At the moment I have a athlon amd dual core 2.0 3800+ with 2 gigs of ram and win xp home edition 32 I believe and all is fine.

Well all is fine for now until I buy no build my own pc and then it'll be great but until then it'll be slow going. Along the way I'll be repairing peoples pc for them and so then I'll be able to save that money for a new pc and with the new I'll end up staying with xp.

Avatar image for wow1059
wow1059

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 wow1059
Member since 2008 • 76 Posts

[QUOTE="wow1059"]I got vista home premimum. It looks pretty, and daily operations are not bad. But the biggest drawback is that Vista doesn't run KOTOR or KOTOR II period. I have tried for a year using every method I can think of, but KOTOR still doesn't run.chadw_genx

I have KOTOR II on my Vista 32-bit Business OS and it runs just fine. Try patching the game and/or your video card drivers.

The truth about MS Vista: I used to bash this software constantly. I wondered why they had to revamp the GUI and make permissions set so tight. The truth is, since I've owned Vista, I haven't received a single piece of malware. Not one virus, not one worm, trojan, spyware, or piece of adware. I have scanned with 4 different virus and spyware scanners on many occassions and never gotten a piece of malware.

In addition Vista is extremely stable on my machine. The only time I ever received a lockup or BSOD was when I overclocked my RAM insanely high. Vista SP1 is the best MS OS that has ever been released by leaps and bounds. It is much less of a resource hog than it used to be and while games may run a tad bit slower because Vista uses a tad bit more resident memory, this can be completely bypassed by turning the Windows Aero interface off. Vista will no longer look so pretty but will use about the same amount of resources as XP, only with Direct X 10 and a more stable OS.

Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :D

Does Kotor II not working have anything to do with my intel graphics card? I currently have Intel GMA X3000

Avatar image for bike749
bike749

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 bike749
Member since 2005 • 829 Posts
i have xp pro Sp3 Best Os Out.
Avatar image for Demo24
Demo24

12303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Demo24
Member since 2003 • 12303 Posts

I use whichever version I feel like at the time. Currently my desktop is on XP SP3, just because a)I hate vista and don't want to install it b)it's stable and everything works well on it

However when I decided to give Vista a try I just use whichever version I have downloaded & on dvd at the time. That can mean anything from server 08 to Vista Ultimate 64bit.

Avatar image for luamhtrad
luamhtrad

1997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 luamhtrad
Member since 2003 • 1997 Posts

Does Kotor II not working have anything to do with my intel graphics card? I currently have Intel GMA X3000wow1059

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little... :? Integrated graphics are NOT MEANT FOR GAMING. They are meant for word processing and surfing the internet. Period.

Avatar image for noswear
noswear

3263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 noswear
Member since 2008 • 3263 Posts

[QUOTE="wow1059"]Does Kotor II not working have anything to do with my intel graphics card? I currently have Intel GMA X3000luamhtrad

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little... :? Integrated graphics are NOT MEANT FOR GAMING. They are meant for word processing and surfing the internet. Period.

true.... although that'll run any source engine game... (from experience, about the same as my rig runs crysis)

Avatar image for luamhtrad
luamhtrad

1997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 luamhtrad
Member since 2003 • 1997 Posts
[QUOTE="luamhtrad"]

[QUOTE="wow1059"]Does Kotor II not working have anything to do with my intel graphics card? I currently have Intel GMA X3000noswear

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little... :? Integrated graphics are NOT MEANT FOR GAMING. They are meant for word processing and surfing the internet. Period.

true.... although that'll run any source engine game... (from experience, about the same as my rig runs crysis)

Running a game and maxing a game are 2 totally separate things. And I'm sorry, but the rig in your sig does not max crysis. While Source games are highly optimized and run well on lower hardware, an integrated GPU does not have the horsepower to run them at optimal settings. Anything lower than medium makes the game not worth playing in my opinion.

Avatar image for strikerthrex
strikerthrex

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 strikerthrex
Member since 2005 • 29 Posts
Currenty I use windows 2003, I used vista for a few months I'll never use it again. I'll switch to 2008 when i really need directx10.
Avatar image for teh_goonster
teh_goonster

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 teh_goonster
Member since 2007 • 232 Posts

Vista business 64 bit.

The search function is very easy and useful.

The snipping tool is a minor but very easy and useful feature I use a lot.

The interface is quite nice.

I can't really compare game performance directly with XP but I haven't really had many issues in terms of game performance.

One thing that annoys me is sometime games will crash, but then when running as adminstrator will solve that. Just don't get why you wouldn't want to run as adminstrator and why some games crash.

DX10 is a waste of time. It knocks 15-20% off my framerate in Crysis and doesn't add to the visuals. Plus there isn't an option when you open the game where it says "DX10 or DX9?". You have to add an extension to the shortcut which is a pain and is not going to be very intuitive for casual gamers to find out.

Also a shame that Vista uses so much RAM, but then again RAM isn't too expensive but it's still a bit of a pain.

It's got its problems, but it's decent.

Avatar image for chadw_genx
chadw_genx

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 chadw_genx
Member since 2005 • 229 Posts

[QUOTE="chadw_genx"]Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :Dluamhtrad

Longhorn was Vista's development codename. The development codename for Windows 7, is Vienna.

Uhh, Longhorn was the codename for Server '08, not Vista.

Avatar image for Sentinel672002
Sentinel672002

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Sentinel672002
Member since 2004 • 1585 Posts
[QUOTE="luamhtrad"]

[QUOTE="chadw_genx"]Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :Dchadw_genx

Longhorn was Vista's development codename. The development codename for Windows 7, is Vienna.

Uhh, Longhorn was the codename for Server '08, not Vista.

Actually, prior to 2005, Vista was codenamed Longhorn. Maybe Microsoft likes using that codename a lot...to make up for other shortcomings...:P

Avatar image for luamhtrad
luamhtrad

1997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 luamhtrad
Member since 2003 • 1997 Posts
[QUOTE="luamhtrad"]

[QUOTE="chadw_genx"]Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :Dchadw_genx

Longhorn was Vista's development codename. The development codename for Windows 7, is Vienna.

Uhh, Longhorn was the codename for Server '08, not Vista.

Uhh, I had a beta build of Longhorn (Vista) back in 2005. Thanks for your accuracy.

Avatar image for threepac81
threepac81

3459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 threepac81
Member since 2003 • 3459 Posts
[QUOTE="luamhtrad"]

[QUOTE="chadw_genx"]Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :Dchadw_genx

Longhorn was Vista's development codename. The development codename for Windows 7, is Vienna.

Uhh, Longhorn was the codename for Server '08, not Vista.

Your half right... Longhorn was/is the codename for Vista and Server 2008. SOURCE HERE

Avatar image for threepac81
threepac81

3459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 threepac81
Member since 2003 • 3459 Posts
[QUOTE="chadw_genx"][QUOTE="luamhtrad"]

[QUOTE="chadw_genx"]Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :Dluamhtrad

Longhorn was Vista's development codename. The development codename for Windows 7, is Vienna.

Uhh, Longhorn was the codename for Server '08, not Vista.

Uhh, I had a beta build of Longhorn (Vista) back in 2005. Thanks for your accuracy.

I tried the alpha version of Longorn back in 2003 before they "REBOOTED" the project. It was laggy as hell and the side bar was a resource hog.

Avatar image for chadw_genx
chadw_genx

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 chadw_genx
Member since 2005 • 229 Posts
[QUOTE="chadw_genx"][QUOTE="luamhtrad"]

[QUOTE="chadw_genx"]Microsoft Windows Longhorn (7) will likely be a much better OS than Vista. Vista is still the same Windows code as the original just with tons of updating. Windows Longhorn will be coded from the ground up. Thus, don't expect it to be compatible with anything older than 2 years old. I doubt they will incorporate support for any legacy devices. The key point is Longhorn is not yet out, and Vista stands as the best OS available today that is from MS. If you have the money and haven't upgraded yet, do it and you will not be disappointed. Add a bit of RAM or turn off Windows Aero interface if you're worried about resource hogging. Cheers :Dthreepac81

Longhorn was Vista's development codename. The development codename for Windows 7, is Vienna.

Uhh, Longhorn was the codename for Server '08, not Vista.

Your half right... Longhorn was/is the codename for Vista and Server 2008. SOURCE HERE

I stand corrected. I just googled longhorn and indeed it did also refer to Vista as well as Server 2008.

Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts

No one answered my upgrade question though.

How easy is it to upgrade to a newer version of Windows on your own? I often hear of people having driver issues when doing so...

pseudonymph24

It is very easy to do. From my experience basically everything works after the install and all you do is update the drivers. Even my printer and webcam worked after the install. It's actually a lot easier than installing XP since so many drivers are included with the install.

Avatar image for Sentinel672002
Sentinel672002

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Sentinel672002
Member since 2004 • 1585 Posts
[QUOTE="pseudonymph24"]

No one answered my upgrade question though.

How easy is it to upgrade to a newer version of Windows on your own? I often hear of people having driver issues when doing so...

Deihmos

It is very easy to do. From my experience basically everything works after the install and all you do is update the drivers. Even my printer and webcam worked after the install. It's actually a lot easier than installing XP since so many drivers are included with the install.

Easy yes. The best option no. IMHO, a fresh install of a newer version of Windows always beats an upgraded version, over an older install. Wipe the previous version first, then install fresh. If you're using an Upgrade version of Windows, it will ask you during the install to confirm your previous version of Windows. At that point you eject the Upgrade disk, insert the older install disk and let the Upgrade installer detect it. Then you can proceed with the fresh install off the Upgrade disk. My experience anyway...

Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts
Vista does not ask you you to confirm anything by inserting another disk.There are two options "Clean Install or Upgrade" You chose clean install and all your old file are copied to Windows.old folder which can be deleted after the install. I have never seen anything about confirmation of anything. All the installation disks are the same it's the key that matters.
Avatar image for quickchord
quickchord

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 quickchord
Member since 2003 • 387 Posts

I currently got a dual boot running XP64 and Vista64. my current prob though is gettin Leopard as my third boot option (just started this on Wednesday) but I can't find a boot loader to fully accomplish that. as long as Leopard is part of the boot loaders list, I simply get nothing :( So i'm back to the good 'ole dual boot. If I can't get leopard to boot I'm going to replace it with Suse.

EDIT: Thinking about it, IF Leopard does work then I'm gonna go with a quad-boot along with Suse.

Avatar image for threepac81
threepac81

3459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 threepac81
Member since 2003 • 3459 Posts

I currently got a dual boot running XP64 and Vista64. my current prob though is gettin Leopard as my third boot option (just started this on Wednesday) but I can't find a boot loader to fully accomplish that. as long as Leopard is part of the boot loaders list, I simply get nothing :( So i'm back to the good 'ole dual boot. If I can't get leopard to boot I'm going to replace it with Suse.
quickchord

Who told you you could get Leaperd to boot normally on a PC anyways...?

Avatar image for pseudonymph24
pseudonymph24

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 pseudonymph24
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts

Thanks for the clarification about upgrading my Windows OS guys, thanks.

With Clean Install, does it just backup the system files, or everything like my documents and pictures, etc? If not, I know I can just put those things on my External HD.

SP3 was only released a couple days ago, huh? I hope my new computer will be shipped with that.

Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts

Thanks for the clarification about upgrading my Windows OS guys, thanks.

With Clean Install, does it just backup the system files, or everything like my documents and pictures, etc? If not, I know I can just put those things on my External HD.

SP3 was only released a couple days ago, huh? I hope my new computer will be shipped with that.

pseudonymph24

It backs up system files and everything in my documents so pictures and whatever is backed up. I didn't know computers still ship with XP. Do you plan on buying Vista? I think your PC should come with it because you don't get a discount by chosing the soon to be discontinued OS.

Avatar image for pseudonymph24
pseudonymph24

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 pseudonymph24
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts
[QUOTE="pseudonymph24"]

Thanks for the clarification about upgrading my Windows OS guys, thanks.

With Clean Install, does it just backup the system files, or everything like my documents and pictures, etc? If not, I know I can just put those things on my External HD.

SP3 was only released a couple days ago, huh? I hope my new computer will be shipped with that.

Deihmos

It backs up system files and everything in my documents so pictures and whatever is backed up. I didn't know computers still ship with XP. Do you plan on buying Vista? I think your PC should come with it because you don't get a discount by chosing the soon to be discontinued OS.

If I were to upgrade to Vista, I would be more comfortable doing a clean install and letting it reformat my harddrive; I'd have all my important documents and such backed up on my External HD. I just hate dealing with driver issues.

I bought my new rig from Avadirect. It is custom-built, and yes, they still offer different editions of XP, including 64-bit versions, which I opted not to get.

Avatar image for adam0926
adam0926

5064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#99 adam0926
Member since 2006 • 5064 Posts
I'm using Vista Ultimate 64bit Best OS I've ever used but wouldn't use Vista with out 4GB of RAM
Avatar image for pseudonymph24
pseudonymph24

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 pseudonymph24
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts

I'm using Vista Ultimate 64bit Best OS I've ever used but wouldn't use Vista with out 4GB of RAM adam0926

Are you playing any 32-bit games on it? If so, how is the performance?