[QUOTE="_Pedro_"]
[QUOTE="Mograine"]
Regardless of being a half life mod Counter Strike and Half Life have absolutely nothing in common with each other. If you would've liked to have a counter strike setting singleplayer there isn't any. What's there not to understand? :? Mograine
/facepalm
I won't waste my time if you come up with a sentence like this.
[QUOTE="Mograine"]
Nope, Crysis and ArmA 2 are. Regardless of opinion.
_Pedro_
Crysis doesn't have as good a multiplayer as Halo 3 nor a single player co-op campaign and Arma 2's singleplayer is a buggy mess.
Fail. Double fail. Multi fail. Mega fail. Ultra fail. Monster fail. LUDICROUS fail.
Mods. Dedicated servers. User made maps and weapons. Infinite customizability and replayability. Much higher complexity and diversity.
Wait, I didn't have to list all of them, just one would have made your argument vanish into smoke.
[QUOTE="Mograine"]
You are contradicting yourself.
Oh man, how am I supposed to post this with a straight face? This guy's a joke :roll:
_Pedro_
Seriously, this may be a language barrier but I was speaking in terms of quantity and not quality. Halo 3 has every available option a shooter can hope to give it's players. Ultimately I admit I didn't write that sentence well enough to express what I ment and even know it's probably going to be difficult to understand. What I want to say is that people looking for a great single player experience alongside a great online experience, finding something better than Halo 3 is exceptionally hard and really only Activison has come close to that.
Rofl, Activision and Halo 3 with "every available option", while neither offers anything of what I said above this quote for their game.
I'll repeat myself, this guy's a joke.
Aren't we nice? :) In the end it comes down to pc shooters offering more, because it lets the users offer more? Typical, here I was thinking this was a debate about how much the devs themselves put into a game :shock:
Log in to comment