We'd all become my little pony fans.
sonicare
.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
You can only destroy the guns of law-abiding zitizens who have theirs registered. That leaves criminals still armed.airshockeroh boy here we go
oh boy here we goOverlord93
If you disagree then by all means make your case. I'll shoot it down(pun intended) just like I have every other time you've disagreed with me on this topic.
Why would war be more rare? History seems to disagree that war would happen less often simply because weapons are different.War would be more rare, but ALOT more painful
BossPerson
[QUOTE="BossPerson"]Why would war be more rare? History seems to disagree that war would happen less often simply because weapons are different. I just assume people would be less willing to all of a sudden go to war if it is going to be so much more up close and personal. There would be less excess deaths, thats for sure (assuming were going to destroy missiles and bombs as well)War would be more rare, but ALOT more painful
ferrari2001
[QUOTE="Overlord93"]oh boy here we goairshocker
If you disagree then by all means make your case. I'll shoot it down(pun intended) just like I have every other time you've disagreed with me on this topic.
Tell me more about reduced gun control making criminals afraid of commiting crimes.Tell me more about reduced gun control making criminals afraid of commiting crimes.
Overlord93
A strawman? How cute.
Make your argument pertaining to why you disagree with me, or be quiet.
Yeah, he's pretty cute.
But I don't get what he has to do with this.
Necrifer
Then re-read the exchange between Overlord and me?
[QUOTE="Overlord93"]
Tell me more about reduced gun control making criminals afraid of commiting crimes.
airshocker
A strawman? How cute.
Make your argument pertaining to why you disagree with me, or be quiet.
Stawman? Ha, OT is so pathetically predictable.You don't need a gun to kill someone.
-Unreal-
True, but it sures makes the job 110% easier most of the times.
[QUOTE="Overlord93"]
Stawman?
Ha, OT is so pathetically predictable.
Necrifer
terrible resonse.
You must have me mistaken for somebody who cares.[QUOTE="CHOASXIII"][QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]
So.. we need guns to protect us from swords :| what if their were no swords.. and no nukes.. and no knives.. and no bows and arrows..
If we dont need to defend ourselves from a weapon? we wouldnt need weapons.. therefor weapons exsist to defend from other weapons. WHAT IF THERE WAS NO WEAPONS D:
would every country stop flexing there military and get along?lukeyAUS
What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.
Kay, so what if their were no sticks :| and its not like an army would invade a country to have a massive brawl.. no one would have the advantage so no war would even commence. I am correct. No sticks? As long as there are trees there will be sticks. C'mon man, what are you gonna ask next "what if there were no rocks"?Kay, so what if their were no sticks :| and its not like an army would invade a country to have a massive brawl.. no one would have the advantage so no war would even commence. I am correct. No sticks? As long as there are trees there will be sticks. C'mon man, what are you gonna ask next "what if there were no rocks"?[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"][QUOTE="CHOASXIII"]
What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.
whipassmt
What if the world was made out of playdough and all the people were made out of rubber? Then I guess the only violence would be throwing playdough at each other and watching it stick or bounce. lol
[QUOTE="Overlord93"]
You must have me mistaken for somebody who cares.
Necrifer
No, I'm not mistaken.
Terrible responseTerrible response[QUOTE="Overlord93"][QUOTE="Necrifer"]
No, I'm not mistaken.
Necrifer
You must have me mistaken for somebody who cares.
No, I'm not mistaken.firearms don't only exist to protect us from other people with firearms. Firearms have many purposes other than self-defence against gun-wielding threats. Firearms are used in hunting, and some people shoot guns at a shooting range just for fun. Also guns are not only used to defend against other people, they are used to defend against animals such as wolves and bears that may attack people.Honestly, wheres the down-side of destroying firearms.. they only exsist to protect us from other people with firearms. so if they didnt have a gun.. and i didnt have a gun.. would the world be peaceful? or would everyone be getting stabbed o.O
lukeyAUS
Stawman? Ha, OT is so pathetically predictable.
Overlord93
Coming from somebody who seems to be incapable of responding to my actual argument, that doesn't mean much. =\
[QUOTE="Overlord93"]
Stawman? Ha, OT is so pathetically predictable.
airshocker
Coming from somebody who seems to be incapable of responding to my actual argument, that doesn't mean much. =\
Because I choose not to does not make me incapable.Seems like a Miss USA answer to a question.
"I would make the world a better place by getting rid of every single gun ever! World peace!"
If we didnt have any guns to kill each other with then we would just go back to using swords, clubs and arrows. its in our nature to destroy ourselves. the weapons just change over time. War never changes, arms change. Nothing would change. Except battlefield medicine (because removing an arrow is alot harder than removing a bullet, depending on the arrowhead)
No it wouldn't be peaceful since most of mankind is and sadly will always be violent in my opinion. So if you destroyed all the guns mankind would just come up with some other way to kill each other.
It's not really the guns that are violent it's just certain people that are violent so destroying all the guns wouldn't do much.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment