What would be the outcome of destroying every single gun?

Honestly, wheres the down-side of destroying firearms.. they only exsist to protect us from other people with firearms. so if they didnt have a gun.. and i didnt have a gun.. would the world be peaceful? or would everyone be getting stabbed o.O

Guns aren't just for defending against others with guns. Please stop being ignorant.

You don't need a gun to kill someone.

would the world be peaceful? \

lukeyAUS

The world was so peaceful before guns were invented.

This arguement sounds out of ignorance.

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]

would the world be peaceful? \

Storm_Marine

The world was so peaceful before guns were invented.

Hey now. Axes, bows, arrows, catapults, swords. These are all weapons of peace.

There would be nothing stopping the King of England coming in, taking it over and rubbing it in your face.

So.. we need guns to protect us from swords :| what if their were no swords.. and no nukes.. and no knives.. and no bows and arrows..

If we dont need to defend ourselves from a weapon? we wouldnt need weapons.. therefor weapons exsist to defend from other weapons. WHAT IF THERE WAS NO WEAPONS D:

would every country stop flexing there military and get along?

I'm not being ignorant. its a legitimate question.. lukeyAUS

So.. we need guns to protect us from swords :| what if their were no swords.. and no nukes.. and no knives.. and no bows and arrows..

If we dont need to defend ourselves from a weapon? we wouldnt need weapons.. therefor weapons exsist to defend from other weapons. WHAT IF THERE WAS NO WEAPONS D:

would every country stop flexing there military and get along?

lukeyAUS

What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]

So.. we need guns to protect us from swords :| what if their were no swords.. and no nukes.. and no knives.. and no bows and arrows..

If we dont need to defend ourselves from a weapon? we wouldnt need weapons.. therefor weapons exsist to defend from other weapons. WHAT IF THERE WAS NO WEAPONS D:

would every country stop flexing there military and get along?

CHOASXIII

What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.

Everyone would get Rodney King'd.Fightingfan

And there were three kings: Martin Luther, Don, and Rodney. Martin Luther was the smartest of the three. he preached peace, equality, and self-respect. he was the good king.

Don was a d-bone who sprung on the wrong cat and got rickets from a stank poon on 125th street. he was a bumper pumper who turned a trick on a skeezer named geronihoe and suffered in drinking a case of natural ice while blasting diarrhea all over his crib. he was a bad king.

Rodney was a pool dagger coochie ripper who was geeking on baking soda while phlemstabbing some hoe in the back of a hoopdy. he did the jelly donut to the muggle trick while Ahmadou Diallo changed his name to i'm-a-do-what-the-cops-tell-me-to-do. he was the worst king of all.

[QUOTE="CHOASXIII"]

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]

So.. we need guns to protect us from swords :| what if their were no swords.. and no nukes.. and no knives.. and no bows and arrows..

If we dont need to defend ourselves from a weapon? we wouldnt need weapons.. therefor weapons exsist to defend from other weapons. WHAT IF THERE WAS NO WEAPONS D:

would every country stop flexing there military and get along?

lukeyAUS

What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.

This is really too much what if.

[QUOTE="CHOASXIII"]

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]

So.. we need guns to protect us from swords :| what if their were no swords.. and no nukes.. and no knives.. and no bows and arrows..

If we dont need to defend ourselves from a weapon? we wouldnt need weapons.. therefor weapons exsist to defend from other weapons. WHAT IF THERE WAS NO WEAPONS D:

would every country stop flexing there military and get along?

lukeyAUS

What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.

all = weapons

you are wrong there will always be weapons

[QUOTE="CHOASXIII"]

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]

So.. we need guns to protect us from swords :| what if their were no swords.. and no nukes.. and no knives.. and no bows and arrows..

If we dont need to defend ourselves from a weapon? we wouldnt need weapons.. therefor weapons exsist to defend from other weapons. WHAT IF THERE WAS NO WEAPONS D:

would every country stop flexing there military and get along?

lukeyAUS

What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.

No you are not. If there were absolutely no weapons period, we would invent new ones. We'd take forks and turn them into daggers. We'd take shovels and turn them into spears. Men make war. That is what man does.

And yes, if there were no weapons, we'd pick up the nearest rock, and march over to some other guy's land and seize it. Invasion by rocks and by fire.

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"][QUOTE="CHOASXIII"]

What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.

almasdeathchild

all = weapons

you are wrong there will always be weapons

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"][QUOTE="CHOASXIII"]

What if, what if, what if. Seriously, if there were no real weapons than people would still make them out of sticks or beat each other with their fists.

sayyy-gaa

No you are not. If there were absolutely no weapons period, we would invent new ones. We'd take forks and turn them into daggers. We'd take shovels and turn them into spears. Men make war. That is what man does.

And yes, if there were no weapons, we'd pick up the nearest rock, and march over to some other guy's land and seize it. Invasion by rocks and by fire.

[QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"] Kay, so what if their were no sticks :| and its not like an army would invade a country to have a massive brawl.. no one would have the advantage so no war would even commence. I am correct.lukeyAUS

all = weapons

you are wrong there will always be weapons

ps.every what if question ever asked is complete phucking bullsh!t and dumb

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"][QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]my clay pots my stero car boombox tv remote glass monster bottle motem xbox ps3 wii laptop metal gamecase

all = weapons

you are wrong there will always be weapons

almasdeathchild

ps.every what if question ever asked is complete phucking bullsh!t and dumb

It would just mean massive profits for gun making companies. Lonelynight

criminals would threaten people with swords and crossbows and stuff and the helpless victim will just have to take it unless he has a sword of his own, then they can duelZumaJones07

[QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]ARGHHH but who is going to try harm someone with a clay pot. I'm just saying if the world was like 'yo, put down those guns and get along' and every country got together and destroyed/outlawed firearms would the world be peaceful.. no self respecting army would invade a country with a battalion of clay pot wielding mad men. and yes i know, no self respecting army would destroy their firearms too but.. WHAT IFlukeyAUS

ps.every what if question ever asked is complete phucking bullsh!t and dumb

[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]It would just mean massive profits for gun making companies. lukeyAUS

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"][QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]no man will take what it wants and no country really agrees with eachother and if clay pots and bottles is what they need to fight they sure as hell will use them

ps.every what if question ever asked is complete phucking bullsh!t and dumb

almasdeathchild

[QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]you're dumb, i'm bored and can ask what i wish. lukeyAUS

probably alot more rape.

probably alot more rape.

Mephers

[QUOTE="Mephers"]

probably alot more rape.

lukeyAUS

[QUOTE="Mephers"]

probably alot more rape.

lukeyAUS

Seems legit.

[QUOTE="Mephers"]

probably alot more rape.

lukeyAUS

Well, there'd be less shooting deaths, and the stylish suit of armour might make a comeback. Obviously there wouldn't be peace, but maybe less spur of the moment killings.

[QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"] Kay, so what if their were no sticks :| and its not like an army would invade a country to have a massive brawl.. no one would have the advantage so no war would even commence. I am correct.lukeyAUS

all = weapons

you are wrong there will always be weapons

No, there would be no peace. There was a time when men didn't have real weaponry, so they created tools for violence, and kept improving and improving them, so clearly we saw what would happen if there were no weapons.

Simplifying or destroying the weapons we have today would lower death tolls since the effectiveness of weapons would be reduces, but the agressiveness and amount of fighting would still be there.

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"][QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]my clay pots my stero car boombox tv remote glass monster bottle motem xbox ps3 wii laptop metal gamecase

all = weapons

you are wrong there will always be weapons

TacticalDesire

No, there would be no peace. There was a time when men didn't have real weaponry, so they created tools for violence, and kept improving and improving them, so clearly we saw what would happen if there were no weapons.

Simplifying or destroying the weapons we have today would lower death tolls since the effectiveness of weapons would be reduces, but the agressiveness and amount of fighting would still be there.

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"][QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]my clay pots my stero car boombox tv remote glass monster bottle motem xbox ps3 wii laptop metal gamecase

all = weapons

you are wrong there will always be weapons

TacticalDesire

No, there would be no peace. There was a time when men didn't have real weaponry, so they created tools for violence, and kept improving and improving them, so clearly we saw what would happen if there were no weapons.

Simplifying or destroying the weapons we have today would lower death tolls since the effectiveness of weapons would be reduces, but the agressiveness and amount of fighting would still be there.

Your reasoning us amazing, it's obvious you know all about weapons, history, warfare, and human nature. No but really, removing guns would not make the world more peaceful at all. Man will find ways to kill eachother, I assure you.Fundai

[QUOTE="Fundai"]Your reasoning us amazing, it's obvious you know all about weapons, history, warfare, and human nature. No but really, removing guns would not make the world more peaceful at all. Man will find ways to kill eachother, I assure you.lukeyAUS

[QUOTE="Fundai"]Your reasoning us amazing, it's obvious you know all about weapons, history, warfare, and human nature. No but really, removing guns would not make the world more peaceful at all. Man will find ways to kill eachother, I assure you.lukeyAUS

Honestly, wheres the down-side of destroying firearms.. they only exsist to protect us from other people with firearms. so if they didnt have a gun.. and i didnt have a gun.. would the world be peaceful? or would everyone be getting stabbed o.O

lukeyAUS

[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"]ARGHHH but who is going to try harm someone with a clay pot. I'm just saying if the world was like 'yo, put down those guns and get along' and every country got together and destroyed/outlawed firearms would the world be peaceful.. no self respecting army would invade a country with a battalion of clay pot wielding mad men. and yes i know, no self respecting army would destroy their firearms too but.. WHAT IFNibroc420

No, there would be no peace. There was a time when men didn't have real weaponry, so they created tools for violence, and kept improving and improving them, so clearly we saw what would happen if there were no weapons.

Simplifying or destroying the weapons we have today would lower death tolls since the effectiveness of weapons would be reduces, but the agressiveness and amount of fighting would still be there.

People would combine the guns that aren't completely destroyed to knives and there would be knifeguns.

People would combine the guns that aren't completely destroyed to knives and there would be knifeguns.

THE_DRUGGIE

[QUOTE="lukeyAUS"][QUOTE="Fundai"]Your reasoning us amazing, it's obvious you know all about weapons, history, warfare, and human nature. No but really, removing guns would not make the world more peaceful at all. Man will find ways to kill eachother, I assure you.Fundai