@MrGeezer said:
@KHAndAnime said:
What's the purpose of metal tubing on the hilt if there was just a beam? Makes no sense. Once again, we all saw what happens when a lightsaber contacts the hilt (it breaks). It really just doesn't make any sense given what we know about lightsabers based on what we've seen in the previous films.
@MrGeezer said:
Okay. By that same logic, the new lightsaber is obviously only for those skilled enough to use it. If you can accept someone going through the training it takes to become a master of the light saber without ever making a single mistake (seeing as how mistakes would be either fatal or crippling), then it's a pretty freaking small stretch to assume that they'd be able to avoid maiming themselves with the hilt.
@KHAndAnime said:
People use real swords all the time. What's so dangerous about a lightsaber, given that someone has had the proper training with it? If that's ridiculous to you, I think you just aren't thinking about it enough. These things weren't super-common weapons or anything like that, they were obviously only obtained by those skilled enough to use it (and skilled with the "force").
Well obviously training for a unique lightsaber wouldn't exist, he'd have to have trained himself. The stretch is that this villain would have to have went through an extraordinary amount of time and effort just to have a slightly different lightsaber, which frankly, just looks stupid. The design looks cumbersome and distinctly less versatile than the already iffy-lightsaber. Could be a possibility though. In the concept art they show he has a robotic hand - so unless the dude is full-on robot, it's possible he had his hand sliced off so he decided to modify and create a lightsaber to his liking which prevents that from happening again. I honestly have no problem with the concept of the crossguard in that context, I just think its the combination of the idea on paper versus the execution that seems a little bit iffy.
Like I said, we don't know the execution yet since all we've seen so far is 2 seconds of the light saber in what might as well amount to a still image. So let's just hold our horses and stop complaining until we actually see something substantial in the appropriate context. We'll see how the filmmakers execute the idea, and they'll either sell us on the concept or they won't. Until then, who knows?
I don't really know why you'd need more than 2 seconds to critique the design, we can plain-as-day see what the light saber looks like. I wouldn't expect much in the way of a technical explanation - Star Wars and J. J. Abrams usually avoid explaining things in their versions of sci-fi. Was there any reason for Darth Maul to have his special light saber in Phantom Menace? No, he just had one. I don't even think there was a single comment on it in the entirety of that film. For this one they might provide a literary explanation perhaps, but I'd be really surprised if they even give a single line describing how it actually works in a way that would contradict people's criticisms of the design. In his last film, Into Darkness, they froze a volcano with cold fusion. With technobabble as crappy as that, I highly doubt J. J. Abrams would have much concern with the verisimilitude of lightsabers, or any sci-fi concepts for that matter. It really doesn't matter if it's a crossguard or not - it's a fairly simple subjective matter, some people think the lightsaber looks bad ass, other people think it looks stupid. I'm in the latter camp. It's a valid complaint about what's revealed in the teaser which leads to speculation regarding the movie - and that's all it is, speculation. Nothing wrong with that.
Everyone of course can have their own opinion about how they think the light saber works and why they like it or don't like it. For me, as I've mentioned before, the design looks weird and it's a little confusing. I'm down for toying with the concept of a light saber, but it has to be done tastefully and with respect to the universe in which it's supposed to belong to. When I think of lightsaber, I always thought of some versatile Jedi weapon that could be used in many situations. But then I see this guy hulking around an extra-large one with extra blades, and then I'm questioning "Why wouldn't someone just shoot him in the knees?". That light saber doesn't seem particularly useful for spinning around to deflect gun fire, and if he did do it, it'd look awfully silly - slicing up the ground beneath him in the process. I get this wacky comic-vibe. I can see why for many people this might not stand out as being something that bothers them, but I personally was hoping they nixed the EU content because they wanted try to maintain a SW universe that was slightly less silly, but now I get a sense that this movie might be drifting off into its own brand of silliness.
The light saber itself isn't really important, but It alludes to the subject of the film's capacity to satisfy diehard fans. It's an interesting subject to me because the newer Star Trek films are the epitome of films that devalues an existing franchise in order to sell a more aesthetically appealing, more exciting, streamlined version of the Star Trek universe we once knew. I'm curious to see if this will be the case with the Star Wars movies. Details, like new light-saber designs, sort of gives an idea which direction these films are taking as well as who they're trying to most appeal to with the films. Will it be for the people who grew up with Star Wars? Will it be targeted more towards the youth of today? Or will it target both? The film isn't going to be out for another year, you can sit in a shell devoid of speculation, but honestly speculation is half the fun of it. This film might have more discussion concerning it pre-release than post-release.
Also
Log in to comment