Joe Biden to run in 2020

I'll base my ass on your fist!!

Ass! I've never seen no plants grow out of no toilet

The Democratic Party are gonna try to get Mitchell Obama to run.

They are giving up on that "Women President" thing.

... because what America really needs is a serial child molester in the Oval Office.

The pedo biden. Hope he losses like Hillary.

As we all know men shouldn't be allowed within 20 feet from children.

I'd prefer to support Bernie Sanders. But Joe Biden is funny and a genuinely nice dude. I'd vote that ticket.

I have a feeling it will be Corey Booker, though...

Clinton won the popular vote, by a wide margin of over 2.5 million votes.

Okay, that has nothing to do with what I said lol.

100,000 is the combined deficit she lost Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

Trump is definitely going to be in for 2 terms if the Democrats don't learn from their stupidity and cult mentality. They show no signs of learning yet so just be prepared (all you little teary eyed flower children) Trump will be hanging around for 8.

The only hope for Dems is to COMPLETELY purge the DNC (starting with the moron Pelosi), do they have the balls to do it though?

Again, Trump lost the popular vote by a wide margin of more than 2.5 million votes, the biggest ever popular vote loss for a president-elect. And like mentioned above, he only won the election because he won three states by a margin of 100,000 votes. Over the next 4 years, they'll become disillusioned with Trump, as they realize he's part of the very same elite establishment they were rebelling against, and see his nationalist policies wrecking the US economy:

No he's not. LOL he doesn't have much support and he's unqualified and going to be a disaster. One and done.

:-)

You win.

@perfect_blue: Well that wasn't creepy...

Hillary won by a wide margin in a select few urban cities.. Country wise? She got destroyed only winning 487 of the counties compared to Trumps 2626 counties... Population doesn't mean jack shit here, when those votes were basically just California and New York.. The democrats thus far haven't learned anything from this and got their asses kicked across the board.. This wasn't about the Republicans winning but the democrats losing. The Republican platform and candidates are all horrible, I don't think any one here (even Trump supporters) would say he was amazing candidate.. Hillary Clinton was just the most corrupt and divisive candidate in history.. Her campaign and the Democrat establishment couldn't even stop themselves from talking down and shit talking their own supposed base..

Plenty more where that come from lol.

Donnie seems to have a thing for his own daughter.

@pyro1245: you're my hero

LOL

Well, Trump has 2020 already wrapped up if that's the case.

Dems are stubborn as hell

Yeah, keep sticking with the Nancy Pelosi's and Joe Biden's. I would love to see the Dems go with some radical leftist like Keith Ellison.

We Trump supporters more than welcome it.

Wonder how much you Trump supporters are going to cry when he's out after one.....if he doesn't get impeached that is.

That tweet doesn't change the fact that the Electoral College is the reason why he is the President-Elect and not Hillary Clinton. He can disagree with it in 2012 and still take advantage of it four years later.

Chances are, until a Republican comes forward that is willing to go easy on illegal immigrants, the Democratic candidate will keep winning the biggest cities (especially the ones that are sanctuary cities like NYC and LA) in huge landslides.

@LJS9502_basic: Just 4 weeks ago weren't you rambling on about him having zero chance of winning the election?

Yeah...

As I said before, if Trump makes life a little easier for the average American over the next 4 years...then those red states will remain red, he'll get re-elected, and you libs can keep trotting out the same old-same old establishment types and rail on about shit like "global warming" and being nice to everyone instead of the shit that real people care about (economy, jobs, immigration, combating ISIS, etc)

And then Pence will have a run of at least 4 years.

I guess I gave Americans more credit for intelligence. I won't do that again.

One of the problems is they need to do this to rally the base that will regularly vote for them and they wont take the risk of losing these voters to libertarians or other right wing parties, for a small chance at picking up some mostly mexican, voters.

that is the exact attitude that got him elected in the first place.

@hillelslovak: No what got him elected in the first place was the amusement the media had with him and no on took him seriously until he had a cult built up about him. Maybe if they hadn't used him for ratings/ad revenue and went after how terrible he was.....he'd have been out in the primaries like he should have been.

So, it's all the media? The American populace is not cynical, stupid and shortsighted? Jesus. For months "Look at this ape!! He's so stupid!! He can never win anything. It'll be over in a month." To "Holy shit, we elected this guy?"

Remember, it is not always media shaping opinion, or media catering to opinion. It's been an extremely volatile mixture since the early 80s.

In that case, they wont remain red.

Good to know.

In another thread you blamed the Bernie bros, and in this you blame the media.

Whether you like it or not, neither are to blame. Trump would have done really well via social media if not for the MSM.

What really is to blame here is none other than Hillary Clinton. Everything else is merely a symptom. People are tired of the Establishment politics, they are tired of fake politicians, are tired of a government that panders to the donors rather than themselves. People are tired of neocons going to war all the time. Look at what the people in the rustbelt had to say. They want change, which is what Obama promised, and now in this election cycle, Trump.

And what did Hillary do after all this. She held a thank you party for everyone who donated more than a million to her or so. It is clear where her allegiances lie.

The media gave him a free pass............for a long time.

And? Did the media force the democratic establishment to force a historically shitty candidate down our throats? Did the media force her campaign to take the path of least effort at every turn? Was it the media who did not show up to vote like the numbers they did for Obama? Did the media force millions of Americans to support Hilary Clinton?

I honestly wish Bernie was 10 years younger so he could actually run again. I wouldn't vote for him but I have a lot of respect for that commie rat.

Given the links we have found between Hillary and a dozen or so news sources........yah... that's pretty much what they did. Remember the vast majority of voters rely on a handful of outlets and cannot spend hours upon hours researching these things as they have jobs and families to be concerned with 18 hours of the day.

The people who didnt show up to vote for Hillary are not the people bitching or complaining, they are the people who were informed and knew Hillary was nothing but a republican and could not vote for her.

Here you go:

So, Hilary has ties in the media, so they tanked her? I dont really follow that logic. On your second point, you dont need hours every day to research her, her platform, or vice versa with Trump. There were massive movements that rioted in cities like Seattle, Portland, LA, etc, where time after time, person after person when asked if they voted, admitted they did not. Also, people who are well informed typically vote in the election. I hate to break this to you, but over a hundred years of polling data bore this point out.

@R3FURBISHED:

I think most in their mid-30's would not be quite ready for president despite the minimum age....sure there could be a rare exception of wise beyond the years. JFK was like 42 when he took office if I remember correctly.

I called out the establishment pretty early in the cycle on these forums. The re-election of Pelosi and mention of Biden should tell you establishment dems haven't learned.

The Biden move is an obvious choice (For the establishment) since Clinton would likely get an appointment. I knew about the Republican sweep since August tbh.

Biden would likely have won this election. But he's going to be too old and too irrelevant in 4 years.

True progressives need to realize that the Democratic party isn't the party for populist ideology anymore. It is a vehicle for which globalist pawns are chosen and groomed for the presidency. I mean look at the Super-delegates system, the Democratic party is designed to be exclusive towards outsiders.

Serial wincester.

~43 and Teddy was ~42

I think after electing someone who is the oldest and has zero clue what he is doing, electing someone in their mid 30s is far from ridiculous.

In my opinion, the media from the beginning was trying to prep the country for the the first woman president and they held back on the biggest dirt on Trump until after he secured the Republican nomination because they thought he would be the easiest one to defeat in the general election.

They could have got rid of Trump a long time ago. Why did the Washington Post wait until October 7 to release his 11-year old recording with Billy Bush? Why didn't they release it early during the Republican primaries, which would have all but guaranteed him dropping out of the race? Instead, they sat on it until October, thinking that it would be the finishing touch in getting Clinton in office, only to have egg in their faces when she had to concede a few weeks later.

Another issue I think is worth bringing up is the voters that came out for the President in 2008 that chose to stay home or switch this election. President Obama got almost 70 million votes in 2008, versus the 65 million votes Clinton got despite a larger voting population. One can only guess why nearly five million people chose to either change their vote to another party or stay home. Yes, some voters died in those eight years, but many more younger people turned 18 and had the chance to vote for the first or second time this presidental election.

Actually it's better and easier to compare this election to 12 instead of 08 since she got about the same amount of votes as Obama did in 2012. Hilary did about as well Obama did in 2012 but she got a lot of votes in the wrong places like the Southeastern US, the Western US and etc. She got a lot of votes in states that are becoming more blue like CA, FL, NC, AZ and GA and etc(besides Utah because the result there was an anomaly in this election cycle).

Pelosi is not really hurting democrats much. I rather she stay as the minority leader in the house.She's just the minority leader of the house. The democrats do not need to make radical changes to win the next election or the 2024 presidential election. Most of the changes they will need to make are in the other races. Throwing out anyone in the democratic party that is a part of the establishment is not a solution.

Also it's possible trump will end up as a one term president, but that will depend on the economy, who the democrats chose as their next presidental candidate and if trump does something that motivates people to vote against him in 2020. The US is not going to stop getting more diverse in 4 years. Trump and republicans can throw everything they got to prevent minorities and other groups from voting in future elections but it won't always work.

Voter Apathy is huge in the US. Obama got people out to vote. But our voting percentage is way down which is probably why those 5 million disappeared, Very sad that in the US a lot of people don't bother to vote.

The same diverse groups that have helped electing leftists in so many other countries and always have failed?

diversity is going so great in Europe. Oh wait it isn't.

No, the media, corporate owned for decades, did what it needed to do in order to get viewers. Abhorrent? Yes. Undermining the intelligence of the American people? Yes. Also note that they did not really say much about Clinton's real big scandals, like her pissing away 25 years worth of Democrat progress toward universal healthcare, which made our healthcare system worse off, or her role in urging her husband to do nothing about Bosnia for years when thousands were being slaughtered. You know why? Because these scandals are not exciting. The corporate media covered all the bombastic, insane shit Trump did because bombastic insane shit is what gives them viewers.

And how did they give him a free pass? They made fake stories about him on an almost daily basis!

I get it, they are all corrupt millionaires who hob knob with power. The White House correspondent's dinner is a pathetic shit show, and almost a perfect distillation to show how integrity in journalism is dead. But dont get it twisted, the corporate media would have been way easier off with Clinton than Trump. Shit, People on CNN and MSNBC float between government positions and the "news" all the time!

Were they using Trump for viewers? Of course. Do they have enough intelligence to realize which candidate would have their interests more in line down the road? Yes, barely, but yes.

So the current makeup at the tippy top of the organisation is a west coast elite, an east coast elite, a nation of islam guy representing flyover country and they are going to run Biden?

Way to learn a lesson.

Good luck with that nonsense.

No, it should be Bernie Sanders and Michelle Obama.

I will be shocked if Bernie ever recovers enough to run again.

Running away from his own rally that the little people took time money and effort to put on for him and jumping in bed with the people that conspired against him was a dead giveaway as to his true character. (technically the lack thereof)

You can't have a president that cuts and runs away at the slightest adversity.

Unscripted moments tell all and Bernie goes where the winds blow him and he made it obvious.

People won't forget.