Review

Warface Review

  • First Released Oct 21, 2013
    released
  • PC

It's plastic surgery time.

Mandatory teamwork is the glue that holds everything together in Warface, Crytek's latest slick-looking first-person shooter which takes the fight deep into free-to-play territory. Whether you're hoisting a squad member up to higher ground, replenishing dwindling ammo supplies, or using a defibrillator to revive a fallen teammate, a sense of compulsory camaraderie drives the intense co-op missions. If your team doesn't work together as a cohesive unit, everyone dies. It's a cool hook that can alternately forge strong bonds or throw your crew into bickering turmoil. But beyond its spirited cooperative battles, Warface just doesn't do enough to set itself apart from other military shooters pushing up to the front lines this year.

One of Warface's biggest shortcomings is its generic setup, which inspires precious little excitement. Pitting the G.I. Joe-esque Warface faction against the special-ops-costumed Blackwood forces, the bland conflict contains only subtle hints of the game's military context, which is delivered in rambling radio chatter while you're waiting for your chopper to touch down at the start of each co-op mission. Once the door blasts open and your squad bolts into the line of fire, vague references to terrorists and chemical compounds quickly devolve into "kill all of the bad dudes who are shooting at you." The quasi-futuristic setting affords a few opportunities for the game to throw giant mechs and soldiers in heavy power armor at you, but otherwise, it's all familiar stuff.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Warface Video Review

Get the paddles, stat!
Get the paddles, stat!

This lack of a strong identity spills into the game's competitive multiplayer content. Sure, you find a decent mix of modes on tap, ranging from standard deathmatch and team deathmatch to bomb-planting runs and territory capture, but it's hard to shake the "been there, done that" vibe of these matches. Still, the underlying action is punchy enough to keep you itching for another few rounds even when repetition sets in.

A slide maneuver offers one of the few interesting aspects of Warface's standard run-and-gun formula. Getting a running start, you can drop to the ground instantly to keep your forward momentum, while craning around to blast the kneecaps off unsuspecting foes as you slide by. It's a fun move that gets a lot of play, particularly around tight corners. The ability to lift squadmates up, alley-oop style, onto higher terrain and then get a lift up yourself is another cool maneuver that adds to the flow of battle. In general, combat speeds along at a blistering pace, and stage designs offer lots of diverse nooks and crannies to use for sneaky tactics and gaining the upper hand. While the four classes available aren't original on their own, their strengths and weaknesses are finely tuned for teamwork in a way that makes them a lot more enjoyable to play as part of a squad.

Some items are tied to a time restriction, which forces you to buy them again after the clock ticks down.

At first glance, the selection of assault, medic, engineer, and sniper classes seems painfully limited, but their interplay in co-op missions reveals greater depth than you might expect. Each of the four classes has a unique primary weapon--an assault rifle, a shotgun, an SMG, and a sniper rifle, respectively--and a secondary pistol and knife for backup. That sets them apart to an extent, but the additional abilities of three of the classes are particularly useful. The assault class, for example, is the only one capable of dropping ammo boxes to resupply your team's dwindling bullet supply. Medics are the only ones who can restore health, and the fact that they can revive fallen teammates is invaluable in tougher missions. Engineers are similarly in demand, given their abilities to plant explosives and apply armor to team members to keep them alive longer. The impact of one team member not doing his or her job properly can be catastrophic to the whole group. This makes the co-op missions both exhilarating and frustrating to plow through.

This mech will kill you. A lot.
This mech will kill you. A lot.

Instead of a cohesive campaign, Warface's co-op missions are one-off affairs that differ from day to day and come in several difficulty tiers. They pit you in multistage runs on a five-person team against droves of enemy AI in more traditional campaign-like stages. High risk and steady challenge make these increasingly punishing gauntlets the most heart-pounding encounters in the game. Once the chopper lands, your crew is on its own. Anyone who dies and isn't revived by a medic in time is stuck on the sidelines as a spectator until someone makes it to the next checkpoint and everyone is revived. This forces your crew to stick together and work as a unit, which is particularly important during brutal encounters with heavy mechs, attack choppers, and armored troops that can mow down a careless squad in one fell swoop. The necessity of teamwork works against you if you can't find the right mix of players to join you, but it also makes for lots of thrills when your group pushes through a crazy stretch in one piece. Warface smartly rewards successful team efforts with bonus experience and spendable points for a job well done.

Competitive multiplayer sadly doesn't encourage you to make strategic use of the four distinct character classes like the co-op missions do. For example, while speedy medics can revive downed teammates to hamper your opponents' efforts to score, players assume you'll respawn and largely ignore your cries of "medic!" to let you bleed out. As a result, your choice of class in versus modes mainly boils down to what kind of gun loadout you prefer. That leads to one of Warface's other key disappointments, which is the absolutely shoddy way it handles the free-to-play elements.

There is no I in TEAM.
There is no I in TEAM.

There's a ton of sweet guns and gear to unlock as you level up, but spending either in-game or real-world cash to buy new stuff for your soldiers gives you only temporary use of anything other than your starting weapons. Some premium items are tied to a time restriction, which forces you to buy them again after the clock ticks down, and other weapons get worn out and have to be repaired before you can use them again. For example, you can grab the EXAR-H Crown for a 14 day period if you're willing to throw down the astronomical cost of 14,000 crowns, a currency that is earned at an abysmally glacial pace in co-op missions. On the other hand, a different, less pricey gun only lasts a few days before disappearing. One machine-gun I picked up cost a respectable amount of coin, and in the matter of a few quick missions, only 94 percent of its life remained. Spending massive amounts of in-game currency, paid "kredits," or accumulated crowns to have to re-buy or repair a favorite weapon you're used to wielding is a real drag. Since in-game currency is earned at such a slow rate, you can sink some serious time into grinding away to buy a rad piece of kit only to wind up losing it after a busy day or two of gunning. This throws a wet blanket on a key aspect of the game.

Considering Warface is a sharp-looking game that you can play for free in your Web browser, you might be inclined to overlook some of its minor faults. The collaborative dynamic of co-op missions is the real draw, but the generic presentation and uninspired competitive combat don't take enough risks to push beyond what you've see done before.

Back To Top

The Good

  • Diverse co-op missions encourage teamwork in interesting ways
  • Impressive environments and detail
  • Sliding and climbing mechanics are fun to play with

The Bad

  • Generic combatants lack variety and nuance
  • Limited classes give you only a few options
  • Renting weapons for a limited time is lame

About the Author

Nathan Meunier has been a first-person shooter enthusiast since the genre's early days of Doom and Duke Nukem 3D. For the purposes of this review, he spent around 10 hours busting virtual caps in strangers across tons of co-op and competitive matches.
29 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for sarge-games
Sarge-Games

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Game is full of cheaters even game mods selling hacks to players. Also game devs awarding players with hacks.. AVOID this game if you like to play fair.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for glynda
GLYNDA

6

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great discussion ! BTW , if anyone need to merge PDF or PNG files , my secretary came across a service here <a href="http://www.altomerge.com/" >www.AltoMerge.com</a>.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for iansixx
iansixx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By iansixx

basically gamespot is a bunch of kids, like ign, who wants always to have fun in games without any effort, Warface is very rewarding if you give sometime, you will unlock better weapons better attachments and equipment, the Pay2Win system is well-done, because those weapons are very OP, so they are temporary, also GP weapons (they're permanent) are very good, (also another currency in game "crowns" which you can win in game and buy temporally the best weapons in game) play the game, give sometime, play with friends, warface is awesome.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Raxyman
Raxyman

872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By Raxyman

In all honesty, the FTP factor is what deduced 4 points from it. Wayy to much pay-to win and underdeveloped coop sequences. Underdeveloped as in "little stages" and "too short"

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nait2k4
nait2k4

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 110

User Lists: 0

Edited By nait2k4

Looks pretty tragic, and the guns sound terrible. When he says 'play in your web browser' is he actually saying what I think he means, or am I getting the wrong end of the stick?

EDIT - Wow, you can actually player this via Firefox etc.That's a bit nuts

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hurvl
Hurvl

2224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"Get the paddles, stat!" Oh, that's a paddlin'!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for eze_sl89
eze_sl89

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 116

User Lists: 0

this shooter is just another "meeeh"

Upvote • 
Avatar image for komuchen
komuchen

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Visual shine to F2P? Even Team Fortress 2 looks better than this. Textures in those screenshots are horrible. The first screen looks worse than Condition Zero. Maybe for a browser game it has "impressive environments and detail", but judging by screens, it still looks awful.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ripper_TV
Ripper_TV

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 1

@komuchen No. Try it out, it looks leagues ahead of TF2, even though they're different styles.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for warfacepalm
Warfacepalm

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Warfacepalm

Most of the weapons in Warface can actually be bought PERMANENTLY for in-game currency and/or cash.

Can't believe a Gamespot reviewer missed something as basic as that.

Sack him.


This review is basically full of libel.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for Gelugon_baat
Gelugon_baat

24247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 656

User Lists: 4

Edited By Gelugon_baat

@warfacepalm

You should know that not stating things is technically not libel - libel is defamation.

Also, you may want to realize that the reviewer may have personally considered that mention to be frivolous.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for komuchen
komuchen

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By komuchen

@warfacepalm that's GS for ya, always missing something basic and are too lazy to be even bothered

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ripper_TV
Ripper_TV

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 1

@komuchen In recent Sonic review McShea didn't know Sonic could run?


Upvote • 
Avatar image for hahamanin
hahamanin

674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

will try this when it comes to the xbox360 hopefully maybe it will be better for me than cod

Upvote • 
Avatar image for aamsyar3
aamsyar3

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@hahamanin it coming in 2014

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bookerlt
BookerLT

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By BookerLT

For a game on the CryEngine, it does look awful! And it's not even working in my Region! ;-;

However, it is free2play, so for those whom it is working, I still suggest playing

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'll play the 360 version.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for aamsyar3
aamsyar3

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@xhawk27 it coming in 2014

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MAD_AI
MAD_AI

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Crytek's Warface is worse than private Joker's Warface.

/watch?v=O6vHOR8lzTg


Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hurvl
Hurvl

2224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@MAD_AI This game sounds more like Half Full Metal Jacket than anything else.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for acryion
Acryion

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Textures aren't up to par with Crytek standards, even more so when this is PC only

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gamefreak215jd
gamefreak215jd

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

@acryion But this does look better than COD Ghosts.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for aamsyar3
aamsyar3

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@acryion it coming on xbox 360 in 2014

Upvote • 
Avatar image for CptJohnnyRico
CptJohnnyRico

378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

this should have been the score call of duty got, call of duty looked worse.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Pupchu
Pupchu

977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

"Renting weapons for a limited time is lame" <<< Greed is more fitting term than lame...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gwd3987
gwd3987

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

I hate rent in online games. I have an AR-15 that was given to me on my 18th birthday. I have fired it thousands of times. It has yet to disappear out of my gun case because its time ran out. I'll stick with buying my shooters and playing without a cash shop, which should only be used for cosmetic items and boosters.

2 • 
Avatar image for NoHyperbolePlz
NoHyperbolePlz

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

This was kind of being talked up as a f2p COD contender by certain people.

Oh well, I'll keep my Zero Dollars thank you.

Upvote •