@morzen9214: Nope. This isn't a cover shooter. Get good.

So nothing important. K. I'll stick to not having touched FO4 since I 1000%ed it a long time ago.

@homestar99: No.

Witcher 1 sucked all across the board. Witcher 2 sucked less in ways but sucked more in other ways, like story.. Witcher 3 sucks the most of the three in almost all of those ways except story, which still sucks.

@AssaultMonkey9: LAWL right.

@Boddicker: Yes how embarrassing to actually produce a fun game.

@velcroboy: Except HBS actually makes good games and most of that good will is coming from FASA properties that Microsoft long since fucked into obscurity for all but older gamers. To be fair HBS has even more hype behind them, just legitimate non-media-circlejerk generated hype.

You can't possibly compare the joke of a game that was The Witcher to HBS's Shadowrun games or what hopefully ends up being the best non-mechwarrior Battletech video game ever made. Excluding Virtualworld/Tesla pods.

Yep, no media circlejerk/koolaid here. Just the exact same article reposted for the second time this week. Nothing to see here, move along.

@MAXTHUNDER99: And by 781.000.000 you of course mean only 7.442, the current number of games (because DLC aren't games) on Steam.

If you actually dedicated your time to playing and finishing games, 7,442 is not that hard over the course of time. I've been gaming for 25 years, an obviously huge chunk of which has been sleeping, school, work, chores, social shit, etc, and have beaten well over 2000 games. And I spend a minimal amount of time gaming since I turned 20.

@elessarGObonzo: Get a clue how Steam works buddy.

@no_one: Only in your millennial bullshit reality of sperm banks and in vitro/utero fertilization. Dude is older than you no doubt and no doubt made a human the old fashion i.e only way.