Player first? is that why Battlefront had 60$ worth of content behind DLC? I haven't bought an EA game in years. Shutting Down companies like Bullfrog and Westwood, destroying IPs. (They ran Command & Conquer into the grave) Origin sucks ass, Too much focus on DLC in their products. Ugh,buying EA products simply keeps enabling them. Oh about 360$ worth of Expansions for Sims 3? Greed..It's ridiculous!

Yet somehow Nintendo are repeating there mistakes with the Wii U, because we still know jack shit about what the hell the NX even is.

IF they are trying to get rid of console Generations and instead treat consoles like Smart Phones where every year you get a upgrade, it isn't gonna work. Why? Because Consoles aren't smartphones. You can replace a small phone every year because it doesn't take space up and usually you get into contracts where you get a replacement one. Consoles are big chunks of hardware, can you imagine every year replacing your play-station? You're going to end up with six or So play-stations on your TV Stand, not including all the box's everwhere etc... And Scrapping them isn't cost effective neither, think of all those scrapped consoles in a pile somewhere in the world causing more pollution and taking space up.

Granted, people buy and replace Graphic cards. But you don't bin or remove your computer itself. Just to fit a new card inside it or some more Ram.

Last time Microsoft tried to get one over on Customers it back fired badly on them and took them years to even recover a portion of their customer base back.

@aretilda: Still ,there ins't nay legal basis for it. Sure they can call the cops, but if laws aren't being broken i can hang around my neighbors house all i want so long as i don't go on any privately own land.,

@ZamboniGamer:

What is being placed? Nothing!! IT's like me taking a picture of their Garden and placing a picture of Donald Trump on it. What they gonna do? Tell Donald Trump to get off their Lawn? IT's stupid argument to make.

You'd be annoyed if you had people walking near or around your property? No offense, but you can't do squat, if they are walking on your sidewalk near your house just deal with it. Only time you have any right is if they are physically on your land. And that's Physical people. If the game puts a Virtual Pokemon on your front lawn, suck it up. It's within Virtual space that only exists within the game.

There isn't anything on your Physical on your private property. If a pokemon appears on your lawn. Look outside your window. do you see anything on your lawn? Nope. It's a video game within virtual space. It's like somebody taking a picture of your lawn, and photo-shopping a pokemon onto it. Are you gonna sue them for placing that pokemon on your lawn? even if its just a picture? It makes no sense.

@somberfox: There isn't anything on your private property. If a pokemon appears on your lawn. Look outside your window. do you see anything on your lawn? Nope. It's a video game within virtual space. It's like somebody taking a picture of your lawn, and photo-shopping a pokemon onto it. Are you gonna sue them for placing that pokemon on your lawn within the photo?

@LowlyKnight: There isn't anything on your lawn though, it's all virtual space that only exists within the game.

@abrianaz: The game isn't forcing people to do that. Punish the people for ignoring private property, not the game.

No offense, But if your house is opposite a public park and dont like people playing pokemon, there's squat u can do. And if people are looking through your windows and stuff and cars. Then it's the players fault for having no regard to private propity, there's nothing wrong with the game.