This cop-out doesn't fit the context of his post. it would mean your post would be redundant. But alas I should have expected that. If this is how the forum is allowed to run I'll just leave then.

You know if you're going to call me an alt do an Ip check and get it over with so we can move on from this nonsense. Otherwise why am I still here? No proof I'm assuming.

Yes but again, a lot of GOAT lists are from console centric sources (hi Gamespot) some whmo continue with their lists overtime with not much change. Often with reviewers who grew up on consoles, especially NES, so I'm not saying Jrpgs aren't on the lists, just that how many times, over the years, have you seen GOAT lists with Wrpgs in it before the 2000's? That's why it's not that surprising to me.

There was a golden age?

Well, opinions.

Wasn't Open-ended Windows 10, BC, aggressive updates, region open account system, unbundle Kinect, more FP, all Phil?

Even if the allegations are true, which they are not, then Phil has done more than anybody else for Xbox in a short amount of time with the exception of the people behind the first 2 years of the original Xbox.

Phil Spencer even was involved in increasing Windows Phone relevance and is helping head the flagship Windows 10 mobile. Which Windows 10 btw, will be on Xbox One soon with unique features.

Almost half the list are Rpgs not set with Knights and dragons.

Capcom

They have still gone an experimented, trying out new ideas, even with irrational fan hatred. The whole Megaman things was crazy (was destroyed by the same guy who people went and invested in his kickstarted, and that game got delayed 4000 times.) I see no reason why people were upset with them for bringing out new Ip and continuing big franchises, because they didn't want to risk money outside 5 quarters for MM, which was never a really big series to begin with.

I mean people complain about Lost Planet but that was a pretty good run it had. We also got games like Dragons Dogma.

Sega would be second because Sega never really fell, even there fumbles with Sonic sold, Sonic didn't start becoming a sales irrelevance until releasing a main=line game exclusive to the Wii and going a silly kindergarden TV show route to the story.

I'm expecting MC to be around the 70's area, at most low low 8o's, mostly because of issues during development (which should be obvious to conclude) and the hype that's for this last MGS game.

They also seem to be going the route of put everything all together in this one big game, meaning that most likely over half the features you'll probably never use.

Sony owns the rights to the game.

Well to be fair there also also Wrpgs that are among the greatest of all time. Of course, a lot of reviewere sites back int he day were console centric so I can see what you're going for.

Example?

How is Sony winning the marketing war? One could argue that MS has the better marketing choices with Fifa, Madden, Fallout, Tom Clancy, and of course, their big 4. Only big game I can really give an 100% guaranteed is Battlefront on Sony's end. AC and COD have been on a steady decline, and the latter is still in the minds of Xbox players.