rockoman100's comments

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By rockoman100

Well CaroIyn, in regards to your criticisms of the game's misogyny, I can definitely see how you feel that way. However, for me and so many others, this is one of the reasons GTA, as a franchise, is so damn entertaining. Sometimes it crosses some uncomfortable boundaries, but nonetheless It IS satirical, it IS joke. How can you hear a line about using woman as a urinal and NOT conclude that it's a joke? Nobody actually endorses using women as urinals, at least I god damn hope not. GTA serves to exaggerate all things wrong with society and turn it into one big ridiculous joke. That's a staple of the series, that's part of what makes it so well known and so well loved.


That's how I feel, at least. I'm not one to tell anyone else that their feelings are wrong, but I just wanted to offer my perspective.

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@hector530 No. It's because GTA is notorious for pushing the boundaries of political and moral correctness. It's what makes GTA, GTA. The misogyny is just another part of the whole "morally incorrect" theme that the entire series has going for it. And to me, that is a largely entertaining part of the GTA franchise.

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Oh no a 9/10, that must mean the game is total garbage. What a shame.

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By rockoman100

@netter99 This is a strange, but understandable phenomenon in game reviews. Games are not reviewed in a vacuum. Instead, they are compared to games that they are in potential competition with at the time of release. This can warp reviews but also prevents something known as "score inflation".

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@steviegthekop That's because it really isn't. "The bad" is just a couple trivial bullets that really don't detract from the overall experience in any meaningful way.

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By rockoman100

@jackoff255 I hope you are joking.

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By rockoman100

@mastertien123 Crysis: Warhead was a dull, short, Crysis rehash. It was nice, as a small addon to Crysis, but didn't add anything valuable to the series.

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@liveanimals Thank you for this. Thank you so much. I absolutely loved Crysis 3, being a fan of Crysis, Crysis: Warhead, and Crysis 2. I've been feeling almost bullied seeing all this hatred toward the game. Finally you come along and say everything I have been thinking. This game is massively underrated.

Avatar image for rockoman100
rockoman100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By rockoman100

@gilaliz I completely disagree. Crysis 1 was just generic outpost korean shooting for half the game. If I wanted to play a game like that, I would play Far Cry 3. I have played Far Cry 3, and I loved it, but I don't play Crysis for the same reasons. Crysis didn't get interesting or exciting until the aliens showed up. That's what made Crysis 1 so appealing for me. Crysis was never meant to be an open world series anyway, it was meant to be linear, but not on-rails. Like Half-Life.