Crytek: Crysis 3 is 'our masterpiece'

Founder Cevat Yerli says latest entry is technically and creatively better than first two titles, but suffering due to gamer "fatigue."

Crysis 3 is "so far, our masterpiece," Crytek founder Cevat Yerli told Gamasutra. He added that the first-person shooter is technically and creatively superior to the first two games.

"It is better than Crysis 2. It is better than Crysis 1. Technical and creatively, and storytelling--all aspects," he said.

Despite Yerli's belief in the quality of Crysis 3, he said it is no surprise that the game is receiving lower critical marks. He chalked up the game's relatively tepid reception to a pair of factors, the first of which is gamer fatigue.

"Some games have lost up to 20 percent, despite the fact that the games are quite good still," Yerli said. "That's because there's a certain fatigue level with the old generation currently. The markets are down[…]people's expectations are much more radical than the current generation of games are doing."

He added that this trend may be reversed when next-generation platforms arrive. "I think the new generation of consoles will reinvigorate that and help to elevate that again, and elevate new concepts of gaming which old platforms are right now limiting, too," he said.

Yerli also said some of the blame for Crysis 3's review scores are due to the fact that the original PC-exclusive Crysis was such a "different" game compared to Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 offerings at the time.

"It was so different to others that the relative impact it created was so much more bigger than Crysis 2 or Crysis 3," he said.. "So, for me, the relative impact that Crysis 3 has created is lower than what Crysis 1 did. But I would think at any level it's better than Crysis 2, and it's certainly still better than Crysis 1. People remember Crysis 1 much bigger than it was, because it had a high impact."

For more on Crysis 3, check out GameSpot's review.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Did you enjoy this article?

Sign In to Upvote

eddienoteddy

Eddie Makuch

Eddie Makuch is a news editor at GameSpot, and would like to see the Whalers return to Hartford.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

Follow
625 comments
bastion11
bastion11

Great game!exciting and full of action! every crysis is different in some ways, and all together is a franchise you must try.

Davirus849
Davirus849

Crysis 3 is horrible, it have zero originality, and almost everything feels like a Avengers (the movie) rip off.

Impressive graphics value, but zero to EVERYTHING.

They just bring back Psycho and Prophet because they knew they screwed up with Crysis 2, but they just made it worst with Crysis 3.

CaptainSam
CaptainSam

Yep, looks good but... it freezes on the final battle on my PS3. I cant end the f..... game. It sucks. 

Anyone here have the some problem? 

I-Am-Alive
I-Am-Alive

The game Looks good and plays well

But...

man dude, why was it so short. This is certainly not an OVERALL masterpiece to be honest.


louseg
louseg

Ill have to go with the crowd, this one is the worse yet.  I mean yes 10outof10 for graphics, but thats it!  I rarely don't finish a game and this one has been shelved on level 3!  Linear gameplay is NOT what Crysis fan want, again I've said it, listen to us guys.

4514N_DUD3
4514N_DUD3

EHHHHH, WRONG! Crysis 1 was their masterpiece! The other two games are just cheap linear copies of all the other FPS shooters out there.

ARIA_ZANGBAR
ARIA_ZANGBAR

Dx11 only ? I wonder if he knows what a market he missed ! 

me and 90% of my friends own Dx10 Graphic Cards!

I had no problem before ! and I don't think I will in the next 2 years!!!

Spitf1re-us
Spitf1re-us

I don't understand why Crytek refuses to bring the sandbox gameplay back. Did they not realize linear play is not what Crysis fans want.

donalbane
donalbane

Crysis 1 was better because it was a big open sandbox, like Far Cry before it.  Once they dropped that model, the series lost a huge amount of its appeal. 

Jvince2113
Jvince2113

Crytek does an amazing job with graphics and physics, but lack creativity in the fps genre. If they had help creating Crysis 3 then maybe the game would be grounbreaking as Crytek is saying.

64-bit
64-bit

i enjoyed Crysys 1 before my gamer ass got fatigued by horrible disease called EA, that destroys every game it catches. 

gilaliz
gilaliz

No.


The first Crysis was a huge jump forward for fps gameplay.  The sheer size and scale of the maps along with allowing players their own approach to them was its great promise.


And they moved away from it in the sequels.  They abandoned their greatest strength for small, contained areas.


The story is boilerplate.  The aliens are as generic as generic can be.  It's still a beautiful game.  But it feels hollow and boring and not challenging now, where the first one really felt like you were put into a weird conflict and were trying to work your way through it (until the lame squid aliens became your primary enemy).

The first two thirds of the first Crysis were brilliant.  Graphics aside, it's been downhill since then.


liveanimals
liveanimals

I completely agree.  Coming from an avid gamer and a Crysis veteran, Crysis 3 is an amazing game.  


The level design is brilliant.  While the massive scale of the first is still unmatched, I truly think that while different, the quality is right up there. Don't expect an identical experience to 1, but there is still a huge amount of room to take down situations and levels as you see fit.  It still has an amazing stealth aspect, and the ability to blend play styles on the fly is still largely there.

I played it on super soldier difficulty and honestly, I didn't have a problem with the AI.  Possibly if I played on on Easy or Normal I may have seen this issue firsthand.  However, the AI is intelligent and reactive on the higher difficulites.  It stays on top of the situation and constantly forces you to move around and think on your feet.  Those who have had issues, I recommend playing it on a more difficult setting.  It may be the deciding factor as to how the AI reacts.

The sound design is great, high quality effects and great voice acting. The graphics are beautiful and truly unparalleled in terms of raw quality. CryEngine 3 truly produces stunning results at max settings. Everything from the environments, particle effects and character models have an immense level of detail.


Preferences and personal opinions aside, it's ignorant for people to say 'Crysis 3 suked, man it was so linear and crappy. so dumb  this guys an idiot'. Crysis 3 obviously did not suck on a technical level.  It sits at right below an 80 metacritic, which means critically it's on the brink of greatness, and is no less than a solid good game.  So for someone to say C3 sucks and that Cervat is an idiot for thinking Crytek did a great job, kinda just shows that either A) you didn't play the game and you're just repeating what others said, or B) you're an idiot who really doesn't know what you're talking about.

 It's not a linear game, and I'm not sure why people think that it is.  While the first level is very linear, yes, the game opens up immediately afterwards. Yes, you are going somewhere in specific to do something specifically.  That's generally how missions in these types of games work  That's how Crysis 1 worked, and pretty much every FPS game that is not fully open world works.  You go places and do things.  How you get through these encounters, and the overall journey is what counts.  If you really felt like you had no control over how you played the game or got through the levels, you must not have paid enough attention. While there are a few short sequences that are a little more constricted, as a whole, it's a pretty open game

I really haven't dug into the multiplayer yet, so I won't comment unknowingly on that.  Speaking purely from a standpoint on the campagin, Cevat Yerli is correct.

 Crysis 3 is a masterpiece.

overhang
overhang

That's EA's version of the Midas touch. They turn into crap everything they put their hands on.

deathblow3
deathblow3

his dude is right it is his best art..... as in it all pretty but dumb horid AI & linear. that was something that wasnt even being done last gen.

edinko
edinko

Cevat is obviously delusional. MAybe he should go to a shrink. A constant annoying flood of total BS from his mouth lately. From this to F2P future and always online single player etc etc. He is either insane or a liar or an idot or all of it.

Chui_GamingX
Chui_GamingX

i agree with Kevin VanOrd 100% 7.5 out of 10 at best for THIS MEDIOCRE GAME ! CRYSIS 1 and WARHEAD is BEST in Franchise! CryTek u really dissapoint the FANS =( Not good ! P.S. And Yeaah Far Cry 1 back in 2004 its Awesome too =) Good memories...

SamuraiSeven
SamuraiSeven

SPOILERS

Yes.  It's beautiful.  Right up until it locks up on you after you kill the Alpha Ceph. Major let down.  Apparently it's happening to quite a few Crysis fans.  (75% according to one of their customer service reps.  (That stat was found on mycrysis forums))

mastertien123
mastertien123

So this is your best creation ? Then you guy sucks :)) If anything best , in my opinion , have to be Crysis Warhead :3

Scarshi
Scarshi

Crysis worked just fine on its own on PC. 2 & 3 are something else for consoles to rake in the cash. They are all beautiful games, but the original just had more.

dah_master
dah_master

Well... I thought the original Crysis was the best since it offered the most freedom among the series. You were literally a superhuman man on an island with some bad guys. The recent Crysis games set you down a linear path of which this freedom is severely limited. 

If they stuck to the original formula for their Crysis games, I think it would have received more of my attention.

botsio
botsio

crysis is not bad a game and yes it is a masterpiece cos the game has been visually represented and the pc was the platform that did the magic!making games is tough as hell!visual arts is not as easy as u think!

Navardo95
Navardo95

Masterpiece? Because it has wonderful visuals thats why?...sure...because if a game has gorgeous graphics it becomes a masterpiece...wow.
Crytek...do focus on the gameplay as much as you guys focus on creating good visuals...

devild0ogwhite
devild0ogwhite

"gamer fatigue"?  That's the worst possible excuse I have ever heard from a developer.  Fact of the matter is Crysis 3 is just not as good as the original (though I actually thought it was better than 2).

starduke
starduke

Hmm, if Crysis one had more of an impact, maybe you shoulda stayed on PC, instead of dumbing it down for the consoles.

grin89
grin89

1 is always the best in my opinion, nothings better than that fresh new ip feeling.

Osir1s18
Osir1s18

Another reason for the downfall is the dx11 only issue. I have a great DX10 card and have had no issues with any new games. Im not willing to upgrade my rig for the sole purpose of being able to play crysis 3. Im not going to bother buying it unless they build it back in

julzeverne
julzeverne

The reason the series is sucking is because EA sucks the life out of everything: it's devs, it's customers, it's franchises.

Seriously they ruin everything.

botswanky
botswanky

I smell some smart catch-up, last ditch marketing here... nothing more. 

espviper301
espviper301

So Crysis 3 is your masterpiece Crytek?  A game that I've recently started playing and the audio has hiccups every 10-15 minutes?  That's quite the "masterpiece."  Here's the facts: Crysis 1, including Warhead (I consider both as one game), was, and will remain to be, the best in the franchise.  I do not regret buying Crysis 3, because I knew what I was buying and the game will live up to my expectations, but those expectations aren't "Crysis 1" or a "masterpiece".  You guys sold out when you moved the franchise to consoles and that's fine because you had a great IP and you wanted to make bank on it.  That's cool and I understand the motivation.  But when you make a game that has little impact in its genre (unlike what Crysis 1 was), don't call it a "masterpiece" and blame it's low scores or sales on "gamer fatigue".  Yerli - you competently acknowledged why Crysis 3 didn't get a crushing score as Crysis 1 did, because of the lack of impact to the genre.  That is where your thought should have stopped, because that is the only reason why the game didn't get a much better score.  If there was "gamer fatigue" COD wouldn't still be selling million of copies on pre-orders.

etramleinad12
etramleinad12

I've learned so much from people that are not gamers about myself than ever before! I've learned that video games make me violent, that I misread War Z's features, that I LOVE DLC, and now apparently I have gamer's fatigue! I wonder what I'll learn next!

sniperwol_basic
sniperwol_basic

Yerli can you justify. How much freedom was in Crysis 1 and compare it with 2 and 3. You will get it. There is only one path to your goal. leave it stealthy or crazy. Crysis 1 have big environment. We are limited in 2 and 3 due to consoles. Yerli you people forget every think when u see Money ($$$). So to get more money you have ported game to console. Please i am not talking about console and PC war. The game was actually build for PC which is lost in some desert

Derpalon
Derpalon

The only fatigue I have is from continually watching Crytek spend so much time developing their shiny engines that they forget to make good games.

hassanem
hassanem

sorry guys, can someone tell me who's the man in the picture? i think i saw that man in certain movie

Stebsis
Stebsis

I think Crysis games've just gotten worse. Crysis and Warhead were awesome, big environments and lots of ways to do things. But Crysis 2, though fun, was just a linear first person shooter without that much room to try things out and destructible environment just gone. Crysis 3 feels a bit more open, but still too linear experience without any destructibility and I think there's the problem. I just don't get what's up with that when Crysis and Warhead seemed to be able to do so much more with environment and choises how to approach a situation, than those "technically and creatively superior" 2 and 3.

Vic22222
Vic22222

More like genre fatigue, plenty of shooters are out and a lot of them are better than Crysis. 

windylance
windylance

With such advanced engine we have a FPS game with so little DESTORYABLE evironment objects which can bring lots more exciting experience like battlefield3 no wonder Crysis 3 is not a 9.0 or up game

Shadowmax889
Shadowmax889

These idiots wouldn't survive in early gaming generations when the tech restrictions were much severe than today's. It is the job of a good developer to workaround those limitations and make a good game. Bitching about the tech do not speak well about you developing skills

hadlee73
hadlee73

If this guy had just shut up and said nothing there would be plenty of gamers around claiming that it was an under-rated game and that the reviewers didn't look at it fairly. Instead, he goes and annoys the crap out of people by blaming gamer fatigue and tech lol

Mr_Mark_Legion
Mr_Mark_Legion

today its gamer fatigue tomorrow its used games and piracy. never the dev fault... never

hellangel_boy
hellangel_boy

Why do many developers blame the gamers and the hardware and never blame themselves?!

haze_blaze
haze_blaze

When he blames the current generation of hardware on the lack of distinguishing features in Crysis... he's basically admitting that the brand has been diluted from the move to consoles... which was a huge mistake for the franchise. Had they continued to stick with a pc only exclusive, they would have been able to build upon the open world nature of the first game while maintaining the standard that the original Crysis set. Still... I enjoyed Crysis 2 for what it offered, even if it didn't live up to the first game. 

Hopefully the leap to next gen does truly allow them to think on a grander scale again. 

oflow
oflow

gamer fatigue? lololol trying making the controls and feel of the game better instead of bragging on how its a benchmark gpu test make the game play actually decent. crysis compared to BF, COD or PS2 sucks.

HyabusaRyu
HyabusaRyu

why they alway forget about warhead ?


Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

I played through Crysis 2 recently and felt like it was an underrated game.  I said, "You know what this game is pretty well made."

Then I went back and played Crysis 1 again.  My God.  Awesome. Its like every tree, bush was hand crafted and placed exactly where it should be.  Total freedom.  So much better than 2.

The reason your games get lower scores are because you decided to take an innovative, creative shooter, dumb it down, and turn it into a combination of COD and Halo--all because you envied their financial success.  No creativity.  Just graphics and imitation.

Kryptonbornson
Kryptonbornson

I actually think the fatigue may have to do with game reviewers overrating mediocre games and underrating good ones. After all, you waste your $60 on something like Borderlands 2, you'll automatically think a superior game like Crysis isn't worth your money. Gamers might not even know they're being lied to, but they'll know trash like Borderlands 2 and Max Payne 3 that was recommended they purchase wasn't worth the money or effort.

jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

Dear Sir Cevat Yerli,

It is not gamer fatigue, sales have been really good since the first of the year. Borderlands, BlackOPs, Halo all sold well. It is true people are starting to outgrow FPS much like they have platformers, fighters, sports games, and grand tourismo clones. 

There is one thing that sales well and that is a good story, crysis 1 and 2 had some great technical and artistical achievements but did not have the most compelling or coherent storylines, it was good just not great. And from the reviews - crysis 3 is lacking. MW3, battlefield have multiplayer- borderlands has story and art - crysis may need a little extra.