[QUOTE="bigfootstew"]You can't say a game is bad if you haven't played it. Hence why he said 'looked'..... For me personally, Crysis Warhead. I just didn't enjoy it.Haven't played it, but Stalin vs Martians looked spectacularly bad based on the reviews. Maybe even the worst game since Big Rigs.
millerlight89
rastaman219's forum posts
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]Arma 2? more reallistic Bad company 2 besides starts beta in 2 weeks You can also try Battlefield 2142. Not as good as BF2 but still quite good gameSmooth317Anyone actually play Arma2? Yes, although it's more organised groups than genereal Pubbing
ArmA 2.fudgebloodThis, a niche game. But one of few I have played 6 months after I got it and still enjoy it.
Vaders skills were more practised in the original, due to them being set in a later time frame. Plus, Vader had more control over the force than Luke (arguably due to his knowledge of it). But yes, you could say emotion was a key factor. But not in the Empire Strikes back as much at RotJ due to him not knowing Vader was his father.You guys need to stop being so elitist over this old vs new.
Consider that in the original trilogy Vadar's skills were not as practiced, and Luke was very knew to the Jedi practice. They didn't have as much control or skill when using the force as the Jedi in the new movies, who can control their bodies more. If you want to argue it further you can say that Vadar and Luke were using sheer force/emotion rather than skill.
DigitalExile
Log in to comment