About time to bring this thread back to rub some salt on idiots (cows) wounds.

All of which begs the question: could these new consoles run Crysis 3? Ryse delivers the full suite of CryEngine features with excellent image quality and it's still just a launch title. Given the experience of working on such a product, we have little doubt that Crytek could produce a Crysis Trilogy of sorts for next-generation consoles with few compromises - and yes, we want it. Given the quality of the developer's work on Xbox One, we would love to see what it could do with PlayStation 4 in the future as well. However, despite all the technological finery on offer, the limited and repetitive gameplay make Ryse difficult to actually recommend as a prospective purchase. That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest.

Link

Crytek even managed to beat Crapzone:ShadowFail on a much weaker X1 and here you could see the idiocy of cows claiming victory over Crysis 3 after first release of KZ bullshots. Like I said all along that KZ:SF is no match for Crysis 3, hell even Crysis 2 beats it but the idiots didn't listen.

About time some of the cows come forward and do what they said they would do if the lost the bet in this very thread. I can name the persons and their texts but let's see if they have some shame.

Steam hardware survey numbers show a good percentage distribution of gaming PCs vs non-gaming.

When I actually took 10% figure as a estimation, I took the lowest denenominator possible. While in reality Steam survey shows that

32.61% of Steam gamers game at 1080p resolutions.

And 4,18% game at above 1080p resolutions, which clearly shows the percentage of high-end pcs.

And at least 20% of Steam gamers have 2GB or more of VRAM,.

So we have 32.61% of Steam gamers gaming at 1080p resolutions and 20% of Steam gamers having 2GB or more of VRAM. This suggests that at least 20% of Steam PCs are equivalent or better than PS4.

So when I am taking 10% figure as an estimation, I am acutally being pretty humble as i should take 20% according to Steam hardware survey.

I'll just leave this here so upcoming flood of morons couldn't start 50+ page topics how PC gaming is dying - because it isn't.

Anyway, Forbes says: "PC sales for 2013 will fall to 314 million units. That 10% decline below 2012 levels is the worst ever."

More here.

A perfect flame topic. Except it will be false because it doesn't say anything about PC gaming.

So, there you go.

While in reality it´s 899$ on Amazon and arround 600$ + shipping costs on Ebay.

So where the **** I can buy PS4 for the advertised 400$ ??? : (

The console pricing is a complete bullshit. When Nvidia releases a new GPU for 500$, guess what, I can buy it from ebay, amazon or neweeg for the exact 500$ (plus shipping, of course). PC gaming costs are crystal clear, no bullshit.

Sony is a scammer.

So has anyone managed to decipher what the point of this thread is?..I sure haven't.. lol

@Jankarcop: Actually most best graphic awards have been on consoles.

Wat

I'm so confused. Do people here even know what they are writing anymore?

I can stop whenever I want! I'll play them eventually! Shut Up!

This can't be pc gaming is dead