@Taegre You should go over here:

http://mwomercs.com/

Though maybe it's not "major", it's still supposedly faithful to the simulation aspect of the original games.

@carterlw Games with actual consequences for being dumb (or being bested) can still be fun.

@couchtater12345 i agree with roughly half your statements.

However, realize as well that there [b]used to be[/b] several games where health packs didn't exist either.

If you took a shot in the arm, your aim was buggered. If you took a shot in the leg your movement and aim (while moving) was severely impaired. If you died, well... you got to sit out the remainder of the round 'cuz you were stupid or were legitimately out-played. (Speaking strictly of Multiplayer here.)

These sorts of games are ones that can legitimately be called "realistic", in my opinion.

@BloodyHoofz Kind of a strawman argument there, sir.

What @Hortey said at least carries SOME consequence, regenerating health/respawning does not. Meanwhile what you're saying is just dumb.

@Psycold way to miss the point.

@mrnormal452 You're being pretty damn nearsighted unfortunately.

The original Rainbow Six and Ghost Recon series of games were realistic games.

There was no regenergating health or taking 10 rounds to the spinal column and shrugging it off... Furthermore when you died in those games you were out of the game for the remainder of the match (in Multiplayer) or you restarted the mission from square one if you were playing Single Player..

Well..... that was... terrible.

Eff GoW...

The world needs more Grayson Hunt!!!

I'm sorry but this is a completely asinine article...

Comparing the likes of ME3 to The Beatles or Bob Dylan?

Seriously, go dunk your head in some cold water, i've never read a more stupid comparison in my life.

@mediarays You need a slap in the face for that comment.