[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

Your not missing alot to be honest.

But I dont see whats wrong with waiting a few months for the better version. Assassins Creed1 was alot better on pc... graphically, content wise and performance wise. Same for Mass Effect1. Id much rather wait a little bit for a much better version, but thats just me.

lucfonzy

I totally understand what you are saying, i just don't see how they can justify it taking 5 months longer.

Batman AA was far better graphically than its console counterparts and had Physx implemented, and it was delayed for only 2 weeks. Mass Effect wasn't delayed on the pc, Dragon Age wasn't delayed on the pc. Not to mention both Fallout 3 and Oblivion, all of these games are far better in comparison to the console versions and no delays, it doesn't make much sense to me.

Dragon Age, FO3 and Oblivion. All made by companies that are/were mainly PC Developers.

Assassins Creed, made by a company that is not a mainly PC Developer much prefering Consoles.

I looked through some other posts i couldnt find anything directly related to this.

Ubisoft are releasing the first piece of DLC for the PS3 and Xbox 360, titled "The Battle of Forli".

How can they justify doing this when us PC gamers haven't got our copies? I am still waiting for the reason directly from Ubisoft as to why they delayed the game in the first place.

Urgh it just makes me sick.

lucfonzy

And 3 months ago Ubisoft said the game has been delayed so that they could add more touches to it to make it a much better game for the PC.

Get with the times mate and don't insult them for a non-explanation they have already given.

Going off the Post-Oblivion Novels, the sequel is going to be one shake up for the game world.

[QUOTE="Franko_3"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"] when was the last time you saw 100's of starships going at each other in a star trek show? like... never? not even in the TNG movie with the borg where an entire fleet is trying to destroy the borg cube did you see that many ships... it would be unrealistic (atleast unlike the series) to say the least to have that many ships fighting at the same time. you would be talking about hundreds of thousands of people dieing (it is not uncommon for a Fed ship to have a crew of 5K people) in a single battle and the loss of ships and resources would be totally crippling. i would say even battles with 30 or more ships would be slightly over the top for the franchise honestly....Roland123_basic

It was quoted over 1200 Federation Allied vessels fought in the Battle for Cardassia. As for Dominion ships probably equal number.

It says a new take on Madden 11, now when would you expect Madden 11 to be released ;).

I had this happen last year with Dawn of War 2 and Assassins Creed 2. Typically if it happens I'm playing game I tend to play for years, as I've had it happen in the past with other games such as Zelda and Age of Mythology.

Nothing in the planning so far, and at this stage I don't see it being upgraded at this point. There is also the point that so far DX11 seems more successful that DX10 meaning a refresh won't be happening anytime soon and you can expect a couple of generations of DX11 cards before they move on.

Unfortunately its already been confirmed for 2011. You can expect a Beta later this year though.

Meh simple improvement on already existing technologies that is being marketed as a "revolution" in visuals.

Ipod Touch 4G should be out next year, I know there were prototypes of it earlier this year and it seems to point to a new one being announced next year at some point.