IF we got an AC4 like situation, then I'll pick it up for the PS4

But CDProjekt ain't no Ubisoft Kiev, so let's hope for the best (ie basic multicore support at the very least).

Witcher 2 ran exceptionally well considering the kick-arse graphics.

Oblivion and F3 are the root cause of everything becoming "open worldish" and "rpgish" now-a-days.

Where are all those "big open worlds" WRPGs except from TES?

And there's of wrpgs with great story, ex. Witcher 1, 2.

@@I spent around 500€ for my current pc 2 and 1/2 years ago,

That's the best I could do saving-wise, runs 50fps avg ultra maximum AA/AF on bf3 and 45fps avg dx11 max aa/af ultra avg Crysis 2, same for witcher 2, skyrim etc. But C3 is a big no-no, haven't tried BF4 yet.

So I guess no, I wouldn't. I'd spend 200€/$ more and get a kickass cpu like a 4670k and an ssd.

700-800$ is the sweet spot. For 1080p and endurance through the following 3-4 years.

People who bought a i5 2500k 3 years ago are still kickin a**.

Not maxed out it don't, I barely get 60fps with TressFX OFF on a 7950 OCed

How so?

How can people still use that tiny 4" screen in 2014 is beyond me. I had a 4.3incher nearly 5 years ago (HTC HD2).

Shameful is what it is, the black bars gimmick especially.

Naughty Dogs make the perfect game for the simpletons who make up 90% of the console fanbase, so I'd say they were excellent at their jobs.

All other SH are trying to copy their formula for a reason.

200k units advantage? Out of 500k?

Those numbers are insignificant in the long , even short run. An iphone or other popular smartphone does those in 3 hours launch day, get a grip people.