jigga1142's forum posts

Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts

phenom 9500 quad

3 gigs of ram (5-5-5-18-2T)

M2N SLI DELUX

GEFORCE 8800 GT

650 WATT PSU

standard dvd writer x 2

standard 80 gig hdd..

looking to upgrade the latter two.. with a anything over 200 gigs as a HDD, hopefully a 10k rpm one and a blue ray drive.

Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts
it can't believe this arguement over proc. performance has gotten this far. it's been a long proven fact that intel proc. peform better than AMD proc., the benchmarks don't lie. With either proc. you choose to go with, the bulk of your bottleneck will come from the performance of graphics-card. An Intel quad can't do much if it's paired with a gefore 4 ti graphics card and 8800GS Sli certainly can't peform well if they're paired up with a pentium 4 CPU. when deciding on a proc., you need take a closer look at what your going to be doing with your computer. Not just gaming, but everything it is you do be it running VM's, divx encoding, everything. (why get a quad core if your only going to play solitaire or hearts?) Any late model CPU should have no problems running games if they're paired up with a great graphx card and a healthy amount of ram. when it comes to pricing, you need to take a look at how much your willing to spend for good performance. Why have a proc that will produce results that you need a magnifying glass or some expensive monitor to see when a much cheaper proc. can produce the same if not, comparable results? In the end, it always comes to price vs. performance
Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts
formally, a game that brought systembuilds to their knees, it's rather funny.. after 3 rebuilds of my rig, i'm still playing doom3. While it's still remains a visceral feast for the eyes, among better shooters, it has lost some of its polish. It the price it's available now, it's more than worth the ride.
Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts

running the demo with everything maxed out... 35~40FPS on Phenom with 3 gigs, Geforce 8800 GT.

Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts

shutsdown?I believe the issue might be your psu.. does it do this when it's running other applications? What is the wattage on your psu? Games can be quite demanding on a computer. 300W isn't going to help much if your running machine with a 6800 and above grphx card. these cards require atleast a 400W and above. If your running with 450W PSU, you might want to open up the case, check your connectors on your psu, ensure all the pins are properly seated in the mobo. If you really want to go all out and you have spare parts laying around, replace the psu with another one and try reproducing the error (shutdown) to eliminate the probable cause.

Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts

I would re-evaluate the proc. your using.. what was it, a x2 4600+? If you know the type of socket your using, probably a 939, you might want to look into getting a amd x2 6000+.. Either this one or the 6400+.. While it's not exactly a core2duo, these are the fastes x2 64 chips available. They'd make you GRPHX card scream if your looking for more performance. For the newer games, a 4600+ is just keeping your head above water. Before you spend the cash, double check you memory, ensuree that they're of the same make and same speed to eliminate chances that it could be the reason why your getting a bottleneck.

Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts

I completelely agree with a previous post, a 300W psu isn't going to do much.. an insufficient PSu will cause other components on your motherboard to flake out. I would highly recommend 450W and above.

for gaming, the most important part on your computer is going to be your video card. You can get great deals on 8K series nvidia card now so shop around.

4x256mb dimms.. You really should consider getting more memory 2x1GB dimms would hold you for a while but you need to pay attention to your performance needs. Your machine will be running both the OS and whatever application your going to use. 1 GB is just starving your machine. Also, when it comes to memory, think about the speeds that your mobo is going to support and go from there. Mixing and matching different types of memory will sacrifice some performance because you will not be able to take advantage of using dual channel.

CPU..Any one of the intel core2duo chips would suffice since they're beating AMD quite badly in most benchmark test and they're extremely roboust, meaning that you can overclock them to gain more performance. I the proc i have doesn't like overclocking but it's a result of my failure to research what I needed..

As with any part, please, please, please (as if i can't emphasize it enough) do you research before you purchase anything. Not all mobos, mem. dimms, proc., psu's are made the same.. A second opinion never hurts.

Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts
I like the 360's blades, it's more intuitive, seem to have better cohesion and asthetic to it but some functionality can be hidden at times. The XMB is a solid rip from it's PSP cousin. it offers a great deal of functionality but it can be hard to find at times, depending on what you need it to do. the wii is be far the most easiest but also the most limited in that regard. it offers nothing to allow the use of your own wallpaper nor does it allow you to eliminate the screens that you aren't using.
Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts
I like the 360's blades, it's more intuitive, seem to have better cohesion and asthetic to it but some functionality can be hidden at times. The XMB is a solid rip from it's PSP cousin. it offers a great deal of functionality but it can be hard to find at times, depending on what you need it to do. the wii is be far the most easiest but also the most limited in that regard. it offers nothing to allow the use of your own wallpaper nor does it allow you to eliminate the screens that you aren't using.
Avatar image for jigga1142
jigga1142

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 jigga1142
Member since 2004 • 223 Posts
if i didn't own a ps3 already, i'd probably pass on the whole ps3 ordeal. the move they took on this 40gb model is a smart one but this should have been introduced to the market long before now. The BC should not have been dropped. Now gamers will be forced to hang on to their PS2's a bit longer.