jed-at-war's forum posts

Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts
It could be your monitor or the connection to the monitor. If you have another computer, hook your monitor up to it to see if the monitor is the problem. If it is not, you can check to see if it is your system by hooking your graphics card up to your TV.
Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts

The P4 is a lot slower than anything that AMD still manufactures. As for the x2 5000+ BE, a X2 AMD performs a little worse than a Intel C2D, but X2s are way cheaper. On average the Pentium Dual Cores perform better as well, but not by as much. It really depends on the size of the Intel chip's L2 cache size.

On average, C2Ds are an average of 400MHz faster than the X2s. A 2.66GHz C2D is a little faster than a 3.2GHz X2 in some cases. A 2.2GHz P dual-core would be about on par with a 2.5GHz X2.

Keep in mind that AMD chips are not only cheaper, but the AM2 mobos are cheaper as well. Also keep in mind that the 5000+ BE does not come with a fan. With the way the prices are now, it is really a matter of preference if you want AMD or Intel. I went AMD because the mobo was cheaper than the Intel mobo of slightly lesser quality (worse integrated sound).

Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts

They are not the same thing, it is a common misconception. GDDR2 was developed by ATI as a superior to DDR, it was capable of higher clock speeds but at the default DDR voltages, whereas DDR2 could achieve these higher clock speeds at lower voltages. GDDR3 was more like DDR2 and finally in GDDR4 and GDDR5 is where the specifications start really straying away from their original DDR counterparts to better suit the needs of graphics cards even further. Here is an article about DDR2, scroll down to the section that says "Relation to GDDR memory", you can also use the list of DRAM types on the left to read further about GDDR3 4 and 5.Marfoo

Interesting...

I stand corrected.

Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts

No, I do mean GDDR2, there are 3 versions of the card, a DDR2 version, a GDDR2 version and a GDDR3 version. The GDDR2 version was clocked higher but probably consumed more power and generated more heat due to a higher voltage than DDR2. I'd like to see how the GDDR3 version performs.Marfoo

They are the same. GDDR is just saying that it is the Grahics DDR. It is the following number that counts: DDR2, GDDR3.

It seems like the 3650 is the closest you are going to get to the 7900GS whithout going up to the 3850.

Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts
I was actually thinking of building a budget PC. The 7900GS does a great job in all of the games that I play. I was just wondering what its modern counterpart is. The HD3850 was more powerful than the 7900GS and a little expensive. The HD3650 seemed like it would be even a little bit more powerful that the 7900GS and maybe about the same as my OC'ed 7900GS.
Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts

How does the HD3650 256MB compare to an overclocked 7900GS 256MB(in my sig)? It seems a lot better on paper with its 120 stream processors, but I know that you cannot go by that. Since the 7900GS is a way old card it is hard to find how it compares to modern cards.

Thanks.

Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts
Do projectors come with the lamp when you buy them? I have not been able to find out.
Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts
[QUOTE="jed-at-war"]

[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="jed-at-war"]It is a Marantz VP-12. The menu says that the bulb has a life span of 1099 hours, but it also says that bulb has been running for almost 3000 hr. The replacement bulbs are rated at 2000hr.-GeordiLaForge-

That's weird. Are you sure that the 3000hr mark isn't for the entire running time of the projector? If not, definitely change the bulb. As the gases burn away, the bulb will just keep getting dimmer and dimmer. Which is why I don't buy plasma tv's.... Once the gases burn away, they become sleek looking picture frames...

You have to manually reset the time when you replace the bulb. It is possible that this is its second bulb.

$700 is a lot for a bulb. You could get a brand new projector that is brighter and has the same native resolution (720p) for under $1000 nowadays. My recommendation is to sell it on ebay and buy a new one. Or else dismantle it and retrofit a different bulb and ballast in it, which is possible.

I noticed that, but I looked online, and these projectors are not selling very well on eBay.

Where would I learn how to modify it? I am not to sure about it because I don't know very much about projectors, like how to change the bulb let alone integrate in a non-compatible bulb.

$700 is a lot though. The guy is so happy that he got this projector for very little to nothing, it is going to be hard to tell him that you can get a newer one with cheaper bulbs for only a little more.

Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts
Thank you very much. I guess I will tell him to get a new bulb. It is such a nice projector, granting its 5yr old, it will be great to get it working.
Avatar image for jed-at-war
jed-at-war

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 jed-at-war
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts

[QUOTE="jed-at-war"]It is a Marantz VP-12. The menu says that the bulb has a life span of 1099 hours, but it also says that bulb has been running for almost 3000 hr. The replacement bulbs are rated at 2000hr.-GeordiLaForge-
That's weird. Are you sure that the 3000hr mark isn't for the entire running time of the projector? If not, definitely change the bulb. As the gases burn away, the bulb will just keep getting dimmer and dimmer. Which is why I don't buy plasma tv's.... Once the gases burn away, they become sleek looking picture frames...

You have to manually reset the time when you replace the bulb. It is possible that this is its second bulb.