@888chupacabra If Bungie didn't produce the game the score would be no lower than 8/10.

The game is getting rated relative to its expectations.. if it had zero expectations and delivered highly it'd get a better score

@Lord_Python1049 @iwoof It's not my responsibility to do that, and you're not making a point other than to criticize my critique so it would be redundant

@Lord_Python1049 @iwoof You can tell me whatever you want, I already stated my opinion. If that's your opinion of my opinion I have no care to object, but I stand by what I said

@Lord_Python1049 @iwoof Instead of making accusations you can consider that this is what I think of the review

@bunchanumbers @iwoof No, I've seen some of his reviews and he was completely off the mark.

This reviewer is far too up his own a55 to review a game and loves the controversy factor.. of giving an over-hyped game a low-score to show how "smart he is".. if this game wasn't published by Bungie he'd give it an 8 or higher.

No one in gamespot or IGN would have the ballz to give GTA the under 8.0 score it deserves though

@JRLennis @krstps That has nothing to do with the game. Rate the game.. not the promotion of the game

This guy completely missed the ball on this review. There's no chance this game goes below 8/10.. it's way too creative and interesting.

Modern reviewers are too much about subjective relativity rather than objective scoring

hi jess.. hehehehe

@fredyellowone @bunchanumbers @iwoof In that case you're arguing SONY is the one with directional problems in the console and development market.

IN reality however that is Microsoft, and they've publicly indicated so already.