lol yea where are the GTS cards. I would still get the 8800GT or GTS the 65nm ones. I dont want the top of the range and the 8800GT is good performance for the money i spend. As for this Radeon card, I like it but not that much that I would go and buy it.
To be honest I really dont care about top of the range. simply i dont have the money to buy the top CPUs so for mid range that perform well enough i dont care which i go for, when the time is right for me to upgrage i first look into my wallet and then look at what processor suits me. if the processor is not good enough for the work i need i just wait and get more money and then upgrade. but by these tests AMD is still behind but i still want them to catch up so one time intel is up and another time AMD, sort of keeps everyone happy.
good to see AMD bringing out some new graphics cars, still i would prefer to use nVidia cards. but nvidia will for sure bring out new 8800GTS cards cause whats the point of the old 8800GTS being more expensive and being out performed by the 8800GT which is cheaper. so i really want to see the new GTS's being compared to the new AMD's. from there people can decide what card to get if they havent got a card already.
to laithkamelot that is called piracy and the fans of Crysis dont like to see a pirate in here saying "oh i can get this game for 4 bucks in Jordan". so i think you better watch out what you write next time.
im just gonna upgrade to a mid performance hardware since i dont have too much money to spend on very flashy hardware. ill get a good enough motherboard a Athlon 64 X2 6400+ 3.2GHz 2GB of RAM and a GeForce 8800GT 512MB all that will cost me $600US so ill be happy i have went and check the prices for myself and its good
I can hardly tell the difference between Vista very high and XP very high. but the XP very high and XP high i can notice some difference. So for me the graphics is the same on both Vista and XP so i wont bother with wasting money on Vista.
true, i would never get Vista for this game. To a gamer like me it makes no difference. All i know is i would waste money buying vista for this, but a geforce 8 series would be better to have over a geforce 7 series. also wow this game looks great. I will eventually play this game in a few years to come, lol. Also i could spend about $500US to upgrade some of my computers components like: AMD64 6400+ dual core 3.2GHz geforce 8800GT 512MB 2048MB DDR2 RAM and a socket AM2 motherboard with the components above i can play Crysis real well without having to spend sooooooooooooooo much money on the best specs ever.
to beedouk. i say if you really can afford the 640MB one, yes why not get that, but with your monitor either will be fine. If i were you with the system you have i would wait and get more money until the 8900 comes out because a 8900 will totally rock with the system you have.
if i was going to buy a card now i would go for a 8800GTS either a 320 or 640MB since they are good value for performance for those of us who dont want to pay for a 8800Ultra or GTX, but since im not gonna buy one since i don't have the money yet and most of all dont have a PCI-E slot (i have AGP), i can wait for a maybe 8900 or a 8950. Maybe even a 9800 who knows, but that might take a while to get out. Also the games in these tests will run SOOOOOOOOOOO BEAUTIFULLY on a 9800. Also I really want to run Crisis, Gears of War and Unreal Tournament 3 in really superb quality, who wouldn't??
g3n3r41xan's comments