Regardless of scores, RARE games are still fun imo. They aren't as good as they were on the N64 but in the current gen I doubt any company will be great enough to come out with a 9.7 and 9.9 in the same gen like RARE did with Goldeneye and Perfect Dark, so it's understandable that they've gone down a bit. Kameo and Perfect Dark: 0 are still fun games (as long as you go to multiplayer instead of single player in PD:0) even if they aren't going to become classics.
[QUOTE="edibu"]As of now the 360 is the only one with any rpgs (enchanted arms, oblivion, and ffxi) and for at least a year it should stay ahead of the other two. I wouldn't be surprised if ps3 did eventually catch up due to its fanbase in Japan.avenger_dot
But for rpg's only 360 is any good for a lot of time ahead, it is the clear choice
exactly by saying "eventually catch up" I mean at least 3-4 years from now
As of now the 360 is the only one with any rpgs (enchanted arms, oblivion, and ffxi) and for at least a year it should stay ahead of the other two. I wouldn't be surprised if ps3 did eventually catch up due to its fanbase in Japan.
[QUOTE="TrueReligion_"]Gears and R6 Vegas. I wish Dead Rising had co-op. Dead Rising would've been so much better with co-op and readable text for SDTV users
[QUOTE="edibu"]the demo was awesome, my only dissapointment is that there is no splitscreen co-op, but still this has become a must-buy for meproject343
It's not technically possible, unless Real Time Worlds was to eliminate their idea of 'pure freedom'. The Xbox 360 simply can't read both sides of the city at one time, thus Real Time Worlds would have to make both players stick together, like San Andreas. I realize that's why they didn't include it, but if it were possible it would've been amazing
tough choice for me...diablo (1) and Starcraft are two of my favorite game ever, and diablo 2 / starcraft: brood war were very good as well. Diablo 3 would be my choice though, as I'm getting a bit tired of rts games.
Log in to comment