@lilnazar Creepy.

LOL at the low level accounts being manned by firms hired by M$.

Stay classy, Microsoft.

@Mugzippit @cybrcatter Sure it was. Product differentiation had nothing to do with it. A good game is a good game no matter what architecture it runs on.

Wish Nintendo would leave the console market (not handhelds) and focus solely on games. They are a top notch developer/publisher. As a console producer, not so much in recent years.

lulz, you could tell which side had generally informed consumers, and which side had f***ing clueless dolts.

@spindie @shruteshkumar That's.. not very smart of you.

@spindie @cybrcatter Not saying they're not, but you're implying this is something new, which it isn't. Top tier cards have almost always had bad PP ratios, and huge butts.

@spindie @cybrcatter You must be new to GPUs. Performance improvements happen at all tiers. The top has always been improvements at all costs. Ever seen a 3DFX Voodoo 5 6000?

@spindie Yeah ok. Only the ultra high end has followed this trend. There are plenty of mid/ mid-high range cards that are small, cool, and quiet.

TItan is geared towards devs who need plenty of compute performance. Via the driver, the card can run its double-precision floating-point units at full speed while decreasing the clock a bit. The 780's driver is not exposed to allow this. As a gamer, one should not care, but it's important to note in comparisons like this that while the 780 can trump the Titan in gaming, there are real scenarios when the expensive Titan is preferable. Gamers, however, should rarely look beyond the 780/ hd 7990. ...or possibly a 690, if money is no thang.