At least Gamespot has the right idea about these comparisons now making full resolution video and screenshots available, instead of uploading one horribly compressed video which doesn't show the differences at all.
To all the people who supposedly "don't give a shit": If you don't give a shit, then why did you bother clicking on the article and even write a comment? I can only assume you're retarded and have reading comprehension problems because the title clearly explains what the article is about, yet you clicked on it anyway.
Oh, and this is news to people who watch e-sports and play SC2 competitively. And as a gaming website, why wouldn't Gamespot write about this? Would you like them to write about last night's ball game instead?
I can't wait for this game. Seems like the true successor to Crytek's original. Ubi doesn't even seem as bad as EA these days who have just ruined the C&C franchise trying to push their free 2 play bull.
It seemed good until he said switching weapon accessories makes your old ones disappear. A cheap trick to try and force you to spend more money. Not that I had high expectations for a F2P game but I'll pass on this one.
The fact that multiplayer unlocks come as packs of random items which can be bought using Bioware pints shows that the unnecessary multiplayer was just tacked on as another way to bring in cash. This games just feels lower quality compared to the previous games.
The graphics in this game are simply amazing, and beautiful to look at. Everything looks hand crafted. It just looks right. DA2 was such a failure with literally copy/pasted environments.
chaos-06's comments