@rpm12345 Lose a point or so, perhaps, though even that would be a bit overboard given that it doesn't actually detract anything from the core gameplay. Even with such a point loss, that would not come close to justifying a score in the neighborhood of 3 out of 10.

I mean, if the game were a horribly mangled mess, sure. If the controls were completely unresponsive, if the entire custom weapon/vehicle creation didn't work, or if the game simply caused your hard drive to melt... then, yeah, it could be deserving of a 3.

As it is, the game is a bit of mindless zombie-slaughtering fun. Sure, it's not exactly going to win a pulitzer for its story, but there's something inherently wonderful about mowing down hordes of zombies with a combination motorcycle/steamroller/flamethrower.

I'm, actually, rather surprised. I didn't think it was possible to come up with a reviewer that was worse than both Tom and Caro. Bravo, Gamespot, you've managed the seemingly impossible.

@caucel_cr @EasyComeEasyGo Still waiting to see how that one gets pulled off myself. If they're going to simply recreate Thor from the beginning, as if the actual Thor they've been using never existed, or if the old Thor died, and is simply being replaced.

@sladakrobot Or Da Vinci simply painted the models he felt like capturing in his artwork.

@pignugget Well, at least they seem to be trying to update the graphics into the early 2000's.

@Chatch09 Agreed, quit thinking like a business!

For this, I might actually consider finally breaking down and getting a WiiU, as the Zelda games always bring back fond memories.

@YouEnjoyMyFluff What did you really expect? They still have to work with 360/PS3 era hardware.

@YouEnjoyMyFluff Watch_Dogs, though that's not a knock against Wolfenstein, as it's a blast to play as well.

@nothingformoney @croxus Technically, it has at least one. Well, a spider-bot.