adman66's forum posts

Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts

[QUOTE="Led_poison"]And in other news, Microsoft and Sony are now releasing their own version of motion technologySonyFan117

Which is more innovative then the Wii.

Will have better tracking than the Wii.

Will have better graphics than the Wii.

Will also be included in hardcore games (well atleast for Sony).

and thoses cost more, and are 3 years later. i sure hope they are better
Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts

I like how you are quoting different sites...and picking which ever one fits your criteria.

BURSTIIIFIRE
/thread exactly what i was going to say, i will use xboxfanboy.com for reference and say ps3 lost every year
Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts

well seeing how i was actually able to beat the demo i would say conviction > mgs4

Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts

so are we only allowed to play "big games"? there are alot of games to play, if i didn't have all 3 and just the wii, i would probably would have about 20 more wii games then i do now

Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts
i disagree for instance i would stay pc has the best Diablo type hybrid rpg, and that gaem is diablo
Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts
so all i understood was that motion controls sucked untill sony got motion controls....... ok
Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts
I mean, why not just release the game on the ps3 and expand there potential market. The ps3 must have a fairly close market share by now and its growing everyday, I can think of maybe 3 reasons why they don't: 1)They're lazy and don't wanna learn the ps3 2)They're not happy with their skill with the ps3 yet and want their first proper release on the system to be of a high standard.(hopefully) 3)(For the conspiracy lovers)Microsoft t in coalition with the reverse vampires are paying them off not to release titles for the ps3 in an effort to destroy the ps3 and eliminate the meal of dinner.killzonexbox
4) valve determined that porting the game would either loose them money or make very little money conpared to just keeping it 360/pc
Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts
[QUOTE="lucky_star"]

Why even make a thread when you know the answer.

Uncharted 2.

wrong, tell me what was improved from uncharted 1 to uncharted 2? o wait only 1 thing was really changed, and that was the hand to hand combat kz2 is the answer, went from almost broken to good/great(depending on your fps likes)
Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts
depends on the game, and score(gs scores in this example), i find that alot of games tha get high scores(9.0+) are usually gamesa that are hyped and overated, but games that score 7.0-8.5 i find are usually scored about where they should be or are underated. so as for just scorewise, i would only use it for games rated high, but not really high, but i always read the reviews if i am interested in the game. since videos and info dont always tell you any pros or cons in games(well sometimes the actual reviews dont either).
Avatar image for adman66
adman66

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 adman66
Member since 2003 • 1744 Posts

[QUOTE="alextherussian"]So Valve is talentless?VanDammFan

IF they dont develope for Sony because its too hard for them or they dont want to pend time learning a newer more advanced system...Then yes, yes that would make them talentless.

or maybe it costs money to port a game and they did some calculation and found out that porting would end up costing them more money then its worth, or almost no point to port it as it would make very little or no money for them.