Not knocking the power of the PC by no means but I find it slightly funny that when console devs say stuff like that, everybody who thinks/knows that pc is superior, says blah blah blah piss up a rope pc is king. I think by this point when somebody says it can only be done on (insert console here) that they mean that the opposition's machine is inferior. Obviously if you're running something like an i7 with dual or tri gtx580's sli'd and 8gbs of ddr3 ram you're probably superior to the xbox and ps3 combined.
[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]Be prepared to make that video. I believe a majority of multiplats are the same, but I wouldn't put it against System Wars to find only ten that play better on the 360. Indeed, 10 games seem relatively easy considering both systems have been out almost 5 years now. I dont know about look better but GTA 4 was annoying on ps3 for me for some reason as was RE5 yet I enjoy both on my xbox :/
Black Ops..I got tired of MW2 after like playing it non-stop for a month, didn't play it since..then I got Black Ops and was diggin it for the first two weeks, now I'm already tired of it. CoD sucks now..they are just releasing the same damn game every single freakin year with a few minor changes. They will release another in 2011 and make bank again haha so sad :( it used to be so good back in the day.
tricksta189
lol i saw this post and immediately thought anything COD after 4.
Its a first person shooter, you use guns to kill monsters. You gradually progress through levels of incresing difficulty following a story of a soldier.
I think its safe to say Halo and Doom have their similarities.
I was more pointing to the fact the all shooters are very similar in mechanics, you cant point your finger at particular ones.
D1zzyCriminal
I dont think he was talking about the actual FPS mechanics, I think the OP was talking about the multiplayer leveling/credit system. Doom, doom 2, and ultimate doom dont have a credit or experience based system in their multiplayer. Of course its foolish to think BO could have copied Reach that late in its development cycle.
GT5 failed to score better because there was a lot of hype surrounding it and it took a long time to develop. Technically it's a better simulator than forza and a better game, but too inconsistent. Constant updates are in the work.
SupraGT
Sooo... Constant updates applied to a game that took 5+ years to develop should fix the problems that should have been worked out during its 5+ years of development time? First you said that GT5 is technically a better simulator and a better game than Forza but its too inconsistent. You're opinion of it being a better simulator and game is fine and good but what is your opinion of Forza if a game that is still undergoing changes to fix it, a 5+ development cycle, and is too inconsistent is better than it? GT 5 failed to score better because of how the game was when it was shipped not because of hype or even its development time, although with more than 5 years it probably should have gotten at least a 9 here at GS.
Sorry to nitpick but dont you mean 1920 x 1080? Also I found that Forza 3 was very flexible towards being arcade like and simulation. At the end of the day I think that GT5 fell short because it was in development for 6 years and it wasnt perfect. Both games have their ups and downs but overall I'll say Forza is the better game.
This just in...you were able to do stuff like that to the original xbox...
EdenProxy
the just in, its 2010. Games arent made for xbox anymore I think he was talking about the fact that the OP thought it was amazing that the PS3 could do this even though this was already done last generation on the xbox. In short I think it was a sarcastic shot taken to discredit the awesomeness of the PS3
Log in to comment