Why is it that so many people feel obligated to solely contribute that he's going to regret it? That's the thing with tattoo topics, everyone feels the need to rush into these threads and post how so and so is going to regret their tattoo somewhere down the line. It's the same problem that wrestling threads have, where everyone whose not a fan feels the need to post that it's fake. Who cares? If he end up regretting it, then so what? You don't think he doesn't already know that possibility? How about instead of people coming in saying he's going to regret it, people share their opinions on the tattoo, maybe even share some tattoo ideas of their own or show off their own tattoos.

The idea that he's going to regret it is a non-point anyways. He's already got it, so what does it matter? If he does regret it, well, oh well, there's not much he can do about it, is there? It also assumes that he hasn't put any thought into his tattoo. If he put enough thought into it and he's known for a while that this is truly something that he's going to want for the rest of his life, then why should he regret it in five years time? And even if he doesn't like it in five years time, then the tattoo will merely serve as a reminder of his younger self, so in that sense it still remains relevant.

I've got a few tattoos myself, and all of them have at least a year or more worth of thought put into them. I restrict myself to only getting a single tattoo per year, and thus far, I have no regrets about any of them. And if somewhere down the line I decide that I don't like one of them, then that's okay, because it meant enough to me to get it when I did, and so even if it doesn't necessarily represent my current frame of mind, there was a time when it did, so it's still a part of me in that sense.

As for my thoughts on the actual tattoo at hand in this thread, I'm not really a fan of it. I'm not really a fan of any blocky 8-bit style tattoo, I'd prefer if it looked more rounded and natural. But if that's what you really wanted, then all the power to you.

[QUOTE="spazzx625"][QUOTE="vashxsk8erx12"]

And the title First Avenger: Captain America is just a title to lead toward the AVENGERS

Oleg_Huzwog

Cap gets frozen in ice after the war.

No sequel, DLC please

Wikipedian

After the mediocrity that was Brawl, I honestly wouldn't care if we didn't get another Smash Bros. follow-up for quite some time, even skipping next gen if need be...

The only reason I could think that someone would choose to not name their game is if they're ashamed, or embarrassed by them. However, if that's the case, can such games really be considered "perfect"?

For me i'd say Super Smash Bros. Melee came damn close. Never in my life did i think a fighting game could be so engrossing.

Pros:

-Extremely fun

-Best cast of characters around

-The best Music

-Memorable stages

-Multiple gametypes

-Newbies have a chance to win, yet you can get skilled enough to kill anyone

- Items are used well

- Customization for matches

-I believe the gamecube controller was perfectly suited for this game with the c-stick and all

Cons:

-No online in the gamecube era

-Few characters missings

Soko77788

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

I'd be furious if I was one of the parents, specially with their sorry ass apology.

needled24-7

Wipe our children's memories of course!

is pinching something you deal with on a daily occurence?

Cuz I cant remember the last time I got pinched

Colin1192

There's quite a few people in this thread who don't realize what day it is...

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

they're not as bad as people say but definetley don't compare to the originals.

Strider_91

How about because they were more enjoyable?

Sith > Empire > Clones > Hope > Jedi > Menace

I wanted to love Diddy Kong Racing. I really did, but I just couldn't ever get into it, even if it does have the better characters.

Mario Kart 64 is the better game of the two, though.