Great trailer, really reinforces that creating games is an art, masterfully done, made me stare in awe at its greatness.

@mattcake Not all the time, take a look at ARMA 2 free, you get multiplayer only, but for some that is all you need. I am usually against most F2P, but sometimes it is a good thing. I actually bought ARMA 2 though because I love it that much though. Anyways EA's F2P way I am very against though, especially with the change to C&C Generals 2, that has made me lose all respect for them if I had any left.

I am a fan of Flight sims and WOT, so I will definitely be playing this.

@Innos007666 @hofuldig Cliffs of Dover? I played the original only, but I heard that Cliffs of Dover was not that good. I may just be thinking from the buggy nature at launch that help it, but IDK.

@mlcarter815 You really want to see her in a golden bikini, not that I am trying to be harsh, but her looks aren't what they used to be.

@jessie82 Harrison is really the only really active one anymore. Mark Hamill does a few things, but not on the scale of Harrison.

@Reuwsaat Honestly the game is really fun, if you like mil sims then you will enjoy it. The graphics are fine, any more and you will kill your GPU, the only really bad factors about this game are the bugs and shotty connection, but that can be all fixed, if you are up for the larning curve the game is really fun. Learning curve isn't that hard if you are playing with other people who know how to play and are willing to help/teach you.

@lmfaoown As much as I dislike COD it is inappropriate to call him a "COD moron", I see the context in which you are meaning, but since this is text it implies that all who play COD are morons. I do agree that this seems to be the wrong reviewer for the job though, as I said they should have used a reviewer with military sim experience or the reviewer who reviewed ARMA 2 as he should have the necessary experience to review a game that is close to ARMA 2.

@Colekern @calum1984 Yes, but all of these problems are correctable excluding graphics unless they want to create a whole new build which I seriously doubt. Though such graphics could be taken advantage of when mods that improve such are released, probably not for awhile sadly. ARMA 2 is similar to this enough that I think it could have been given a better score if the correctable problems were negated, but I know that cannot be. As for you calum I can explain, tbh I love this game so I do not want to seem like I am against it, there are many problems with this game and you cannot negate them when giving a review, some of these complaints are silly such as controls as that is apart of the learning curve yet can still easily be mastered, and we are not dealing with the same reviewer as the one who reviewed ARMA 2 either so that is another factor. All in all this game is great imo, but it is obsolete too, I only bought this game because I love this engine, love WW2, and for the main reason as acting as a placeholder until ARMA 3 comes out. I still say there should be a section like GI's Second Opinion to provide a more unbiased part to it, but they have a schedule and they need not waste any more time on something which can be discovered by yourself, look up videos, buy the game, wait for a demo, etc. It is not as if they are forcing these same opinions on you, bugs will be fixed, connection problems will be fixed, negate those if you like games like this, they will be fixed.

@Colekern @Hobbes444 I agree that it is too late, but that is why I like Game Informers "Second Opinion" article which negates factors such as bugs and other fixable options and is less biased. Gives you both the reviewers opinion and an if you like such opinion. Though it is not too much of a concern, I played this game and I like it, honestly I say wait till they make a demo and judge for yourself. If you don't, that is your choice, many including myself will have fun with this game whether many of you buy it or not.