Seiki_sands' forum posts

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

33

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

I am a son, brother, and uncle.

Desirous of following the teachings of Christ.

Someone devoid of ambition to whom things come easy, yet never permits, or even entertains, a respite from struggling.

An Individualist, skeptical of tribalism, that tries to engage in it with eyes open.

An American through to my bones, even at times I would prefer not to be (especially when I would prefer not to be).

Determined to be an aid and helping hand to my niece, whom I helped raise.

A scatterbrained person with a ridiculous and unwieldy store of knowledge who can't seem to stop accruing.

I am nitpicky and yet sloppy.

I always come up evenly split on left-brain, right-brain tests.

I'm left handed.

I've grown far too fat.

Mostly kind and polite in demeanor, violent and confrontational in thought, seldom expressed and never consummated in deed.

An excellent test-taker, a conscientious worker, and a lazy person.

A seemingly, endlessly optimistic misanthrope, against my judgment in both assignations.

A hoarder, an organizer, and an artist.

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

33

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@nepu7supastar7 said:

@techhog89:

I used to wonder how Trump expects to keep playing the charade but now I see that his supporters are gullible enough to keep it running all the way through Inauguration day. Hell, maybe even further than that. All Trump has to say is that he vows to keep fighting reality. And they'll continue to give him money.

This is going to continue until Trump retires or dies, whichever comes first.

I'm hoping his mugshots, if they occur, will bring some reckoning. I believe every President in my lifetime (I was born during the Reagan tenure) has committed impeachable offenses, most that were never fully adjudicated thanks to the fact that Presidents really have been above the law. A lot of historians believe Ford pardoning Nixon was essential to bringing a divided nation with a cratering trust in Government back from the brink. I could not disagree more. I think the foundation for any rebirth of citizenship rests upon accountability being demonstrated. Without it we will never grow up, being children and hiding behind our leaders, letting them shield us from our responsibilities of self-governance.

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

33

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

@vl4d_l3nin: Elliot Page is a child on hormone blockers? He was descriminated against legally or in some other way?

Oh wait, your next sentence explains it.

"It all comes down to how trans people self identify, and how much the wider society is willing to go along with it."

Precisely what should society do about all those trans people self-identifying?

Boy, do I feel silly, this wasn't a surreptitious way of condemning the existence of a transexual human, at all. The mods should feel proud of themselves.

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

33

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

@vl4d_l3nin said:
@MK245 said:

I think the most interesting thing about this topic more so than anything about Page, is that it was posted in a political forum.

It certainly sheds light into the conservative mindset.

It's not just a mindset, it's specifically a worldview. There are very basic and fundamental norms that are being challenged. People will obviously have a problem with that.

Religion also encompasses a worldview, and that also often has nothing to do with politics. If a zookeeper converts from Protestantism to Islam it might make some people uncomfortable and someone might have something to say about it, but that doesn't make it political.

Discomfort with changing norms is only political if there is some subject around which compromise and dispute over our governance is at issue or could potentially arise. If there is no decision to be made, then there is no politics. Is someone proposing something? The mere existence of Transsexuals' is only political if you think something should be done about their existence. Do you want to ban Trans people? That would be political. It would be hateful, but political.

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

33

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

@Dark_sageX said:

@MirkoS77: You think things are better just because Biden won?

c) that attitude of yours and a lot of people here is EXACTLY the problem with america, you think Trump is the problem, but once you get the president you want you just neglect the rest of the country and then have a Pikachu surprise face when another Donald Trump wins, you guys are the ones being divisive, not Trump, have you personally even bothered to address the concern of Trump voters or did you just stand on the side line and dismiss them as people beneath you? your post is proof that there is division in the USA, the divisiveness hasn't died down one bit, if anything its intensifying. Trump has lost (or is losing) so how can you blame him now? maybe its about time you look at yourself instead of looking for someone to blame?

You do realize what you're implying, right?

You say his tribe ignores the other tribe (as if everyone doesn't have problems) and that's why people inflicted Trump on the country.

I agree Trump isn't the primary source of the divisiveness, the divisiveness sadly has been a largely bottom-up movement. Some people wanted Trump to be a horrible weapon against the changes, as long as he was their weapon to wield. Some sort of message to those they think are to blame for their problems. You seem to know instinctively, even if you wouldn't say it out loud that he didn't belong anywhere near the levers of power; yet they used this mentally broken man, who frankly needs serious care. They've failed in their responsibilities as citizens and now want to hold it against others, but you obviously know where the blame lies. Your last sentence is everything Trump had to offer you, the only thing he ever had to offer anyone: beautiful, terrible projection.

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

33

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

Gen 1: Only played Pong from that era, so...Pong

Gen 2: Tempest

Gen 3: Ninja Gaiden II: Dark Sword of Chaos

Gen 4: Super Metroid

Gen 5: Age of Empires II

Gen 6: Metroid Prime

Gen 7: Bayonetta

Gen 8: Red Dead Redemption II

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

33

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

@eoten said:
@tenaka2 said:
@mecha_frieza said:
@tenaka2 said:

It is mainly when he says stupid stuff or tells his supporters to break the law, so yeah you are right it is pretty much daily.

Another thing that he says taken out of context? Rich.

Except it is not out of context and like so many of the idiotic things trump says he says it on camera.

Fine people on both sides of this argument.

It is out of context, and I posted the full video to prove it. You know, the one you and others are pretending doesn't exist so you can pretend he actually said something he didn't. When you go through such lengths to convince yourself the full video doesn't exist just so you can have an excuse to continue believing the lie, that's a symptom of TDS.

I acknowledged it exists, as have others. I've listened to it, as have others. You lack basic comprehension skills. The President told some of his supporters to vote twice. He told them to vote by absentee, and again in person if there was no record of them having voted YET. That vote might very well still be in the mail, it doesn't have to arrive till 3 days after the election in the state he was speaking in. You do not get to vote twice just because the polling place doesn't yet have a record of your absentee vote, that is ILLEGAL.

You are an intellectually dishonest person who ignores what you don't want to hear. You are projecting with your TDS BS.

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

33

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

@eoten said:
@Seiki_sands said:
@eoten said:
@Seiki_sands said:

I certainly did listen to the entire video. And he told people to vote twice, illegally.

He told his supporters to vote by mail-in ballot.

He told his supporters to go to the polls, and see if their vote had been counted yet, and if not, vote.

That is voting twice. It is illegal.

He said when they later count the votes, they will catch the fact that you voted twice and not count the vote (Presumably, he wishes his supporters to believe the tabulators will only throw out one of the two ballots. In reality they will throw out both and report you to the authorities if they catch your attempt to vote twice).

None of his "carefully" worded verbal diarrhea changes or mitigates the fact that he told people to vote twice, illegally. It does suggest he is trying to create an ethical "out" for himself and his supporters, by raising the unconvincing possibility that he believed the crime would be caught, and therefore harmless and victimless.

I say unconvincing because in order to believe that, you would have to believe that he believes 100% of the attempts to vote twice will be caught as he believes we have such secure electoral systems, even an influx of thousands or millions of attempts at fraud will be caught immediately. Does he have a track record of believing such a thing? Or does he have a track record of saying the exact opposite?

"And if not." Do you not understand what this means? Also, he said if it hasn't been tabulated meaning recorded that you actually voted, not that your vote had been counted, but simply that they received it. Now, if they never received your mail in vote, you don't think you should be able to do so in person on the last day you have to actually vote?

"And if not" means he is telling people to not flagrantly vote twice, when the proof of their attempt is right in front of them. It does not mean that he is telling no one to vote twice, he very clearly is telling some people to vote twice, as long as the proof isn't on hand at the polling booth.

Ballots have to be postmarked by voting day, not received by voting day. In North Carolina, they have to be received by Nov. 6th. How would asking whether they received your ballot and hearing no, justify voting a second time? It wouldn't, it is a crime. State authorities have said it is a crime. The President told his supporters to commit a crime.

Aah, so your retort is a baseless conspiracy theory. Gotcha. Except y'all have already said on here the election system is secure, so that's not really a risk, is it? Seems you just don't care if peoples votes are counted or not.

My retort is the English language. I speculated about nothing. You have comprehension issues if you cannot clearly hear the President tell some people to vote twice.

The only word I used subjectively is the word "flagrantly", the meaning of the sentence it appears in would not be changed appreciably without that word. It was used to emphasize how ridiculous it would be on that day in the voting booth if he did not include the words "and if not".