RossRichard's forum posts

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

So this is the new version of the failed Retro VGS?

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

Grim Dawn.

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

Another year, another Lem circlejerk about games they assume will sell systems, but won't.

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

@intotheminx said:

@RossRichard: To be fair, the first guy had a better GPU(open box deal). Just for fun, here is a PC that costs $400-$500 and better than both.

Well of course your PC is better, the video is two years old. The hardware they would use now is completely different on both counts. However, the point will still remain. AMD is hard to beat in that price range. That is why going with AMD is a no-brainer for Sony and MS. Thus rendering this whole thread irrelevant.

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

AMD gave Sony and MS the CPU they wanted for the price they were willing to pay. Sony/MS didn't want the new consoles to be powerful, they wanted them to be cheap. Yes AMD is trailing behind Intel, but that does not mean their CPUs are garbage. I dare anyone to put together $400-$500 gaming rigs with Intel CPU and an AMD CPU and see which one is better.

Oh wait, that has been done already. By Gamespot, no less.

Loading Video...
Loading Video...

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

Considering 6 months ago this happened, this news means that the content is EXTREMELY rushed, or the first release is pretty light on content.

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

FF6>FF4>FF1>FF7>FF5>FF9>FF8>FF10>FF3>FF2

The rest I haven't played yet.

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

It's just a hobby to me. A hobby I'm extremely passionate about, but just a hobby regardless. Just like reading, playing music and watching movies.

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

Sure, why not? It is a pretty cheap game, you are getting a lot of content for the asking price.

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

Wii U was marketed HORRIBLY and the system was reliant on a gamepad that nobody wanted. It's a shame, because the actual console is great and the first-party games are amazing.