Yeah do w/e makes sense for you. I'm just pointing out that old CPUs just won't hold up in more CPU intensive segments of games. The 920 isn't being tested here but the i3 being tested is similar in performance.
It looks pretty good in the countryside but once he starts going around the inner city there is a pretty severe bottleneck at 1080p. You would have to be more specific about what games at what settings are getting 120 fps, because this one certainly is not.
@novaprime1985: Just get it for PC. If they made it run in double the FPS they would also need to further scale back visuals. The frame rate of games is usually very intentional and not something that can simply be increased.
@fallkan: For the purpose of benchmarks, max settings are often used, leading people to your conclusion. In practice, some of the higher settings can be poorly optimized, or just have a more significant impact at 4K like MSAA and therefore can be turned off without too much of an impact on visual quality.
@G4mBi7: You would definitely see a significant performance increase with a better processor. You should get a newer CPU especially for running games at higher fps.
RCT4ShouldExist's comments