@seanh: Visted about 20. Almost all had the exact same gravitational and atmospheric attributes, even the outposts I encountered were copies of each other.

As someone who actually wanted to see different things and explore, I was heavily disappointed.

There might be more, but I'm not going to keep playing a game when all I've found from the first 30 hours or so is disappointment.

@elessarGObonzo: I did. For six months. The things they said made it seem more interesting that a few copy/pasted buildings and uninteresting planets.

The variability in the planets and flying mechanics are the worst part. But let's just ignore that and pretend nobody knows what they're talking about shall we?

@elessarGObonzo: I looked since the initial announcement.

I think you're a tool if you believe what you've stated here.

The features of the game which drew in many either aren't interesting in practice or are non existent.

I have praise for games that try. games like KSP. NMS feels like Sony and SM trying to pull as much as they can for software that really doesn't warrant it.

@dodgers0022: Try KSP. Spent 300 hours on that GAME over the last month.

@dodgers0022: You were actually busy writing a comment, wishing NMS were as entertaining....

:D

@dodgers0022: Games are made for instant gratification. If I wanted to do something monotonous I'd spend my gaming time working.

It's a bad game. Great monotony simulator though.

@gelgoog2: PC? NO. Let's just not be complete dicks because we feel some invisible super power gives us such a right.

If you want me to not be PC, come visit. You won't like the outcome.

@Blk_Mage_Ctype: Simply because you don't see the relevance doesn't make it obsolete.

@zerofrust: Useless shit?

Not so much if you're gay/have gay friends.

perhaps you should look into matters more relevant to your interests rather than criticise those who have a genuine interest in things you see no point in?

@Orontes13: You don't have much of a life do you dude?