As I’ve gotten older, I have tended to buy fewer and fewer games and it takes me so much longer to finish games because of my hectic work schedule. I’ve just learned to roll with the punches and accept that life dominates too much over video games at this point for now.

I wonder if the XBOX One controller will work just as fine too.

Here is my dilemma. My HTC Incredible is malfunctioning and so is my iPod Touch. So in essence, I need a new phone and an mp3 player. I figured I might as well kill 2 birds with one stone by buying the iPhone 4S. What worries me are the rumors about the iPhone 5 coming out this year andits unclear release date.

I have a few questions to you Apple loyalists.

1. Is it wise to buy an Apple product 4 months after the product's release date?
2. Does Verizon (my carrier service) or any other carrier do any trade in type deals for older iPhones to get the newer iPhone for a discounted price? Seeing as how if I get the iPhone 4S, the iPhone 5 would be out before my early upgrade. This is just in case I'd like to upgrade to the iPhone 5 this year as well.

I'm all for a second analog stick. I'm just really happy I didn't buy the first version of the 3DS.

All I know is that you guys will be getting an ashy knee cap to the chest from my Jeffry.

Evo 2k11 is this weekend. Just a reminder guys.

I was loving the new Tomb Raider game. It looks so gorgeous and epic.

With both Sony and Nintendo unveiling new hardware this E3, Microsoft seems like its at a disadvantage in terms of sheer shock value. I'm not totally convinced that showing just quality titles can keep up with the momentum and hype of new hardware, especially hardware that will supposedly be playable to the public. Microsoft needs a megaton announcement. Something that will be out of left field like scoring exclusives to Final Fantasy XV or Kingdom Hearts 3 or a Call of Duty title.

I'm really happy that Uncharted isn't going to be to be a trilogy. I know people complain about sequels to no end but to honest, I love sequels; especially sequels that are good.

But the time limit does not fix the turtling problem. What if the losing player is the victim of a turtle player? The turtle could simply just milk the clock. You could make the argument for the benifit of turtle players. An infinite timer is the best route because it buys you time to exploit your opponent's weaknesses, as opposed to running the risk of the time expiring while falling victim to a turtle player. You're taking risks the entire game.

EDIT: It's all just a difference of opinions. Your preference is no better than mine, and visa-versa. Lets just agree to disagree. :P

LikeHaterade

An infinite timer is definitely not the best solution. You eliminate legitimate tactics with infinite time. Turtling would be either way overpowered or depowered due to this.