Wow... an Elder Scrolls MMO... How... BORING. I mean, wasn't the draw of Elder Scrolls that it's a giant game, all about providing an immense singleplayer experience? If you make it into an MMO, won't it just be an unofficial LOTR online game? (not a rhetorical question by the way :-)) I mean, the look of the game - characters and world - isn't very iconic, nor does it provide anything particularly new or interesting to the MMO genre. Sure, there's lore and such, but that's really best experienced, when you can relax and take your time with the game (offline). Ok, ok, I'm aware of the tigerpeople and lizardfolk and they're kinda original, they're just soooooooo lame. Sorry, many will disagree and them's the rules. Just speaking my mind. I have never played an MMO and I never will, and perhaps I'm just worried that the next step for all the great RPG's is simply to throw it online, to be torn apart by the extremely critical pc-core. Don't do it Mass Effect - and come back Old Republic.. alls forgiven, just come home, ok baby??

@shiss27 So, you just wanna make sure, that all those feelings of being "wrong", "unusual", "unaccepted" and worse, that people with different lifestyles suffer through in their youth and beyond, gets topped off with a nice signed and framed helping of: "and yes, you are also natural abominations." Well done, sir. We are not animals, we are people and the meaning of life is an incomprehensibly complicated thing to nail down and it borders on recklessness, when you strut around and label things as correct or incorrect. True or untrue. Living only to create life, just as "survival of the fittest" no longer applies to us. Things have changed. "So you better start swimming or you'll sink like a stone." (Bob Dylan)

@shiss27 And then what is this truth you convey? That life is created through sperm and eggs? Well, I'm pretty sure we can all agree on that. Is your point that it's incorrect to lead a lifestyle that does not support this equation directly? No, you seem to like all walks of life, you said. So what are you actually doing besides sniffin' your own farts here? You seem quite excited about...something...but, it's not clear what it is.

@Runock I also think that constantly mentioning that these people have "issues" and "confusion" and whatnot, may be totally in the gutter. To these people it's probably very simple and the issues and confusion is more based on how OTHER people react.

@Runock I only have issues, when you claim that what you're saying is fact. It's about what you write here and now. Who or what you are, I have no opinion on. Now, there is something fundamentally wrong with what you just said. "People who get a sex-change are denying who they are". Now, we can probably agree on the idea that who we are, is mainly based in the mind. The rest is meat and bones. So, going through a sex-change - isn't that just creating balance physically and mentally? In other words, not denying but embracing what you are?

@Rudock And you did it again. "telling the truth". It's NOT the truth. It's just you stating your opinion. I'm doing the same thing, but I do not go out of my way to underline how true and factual it is. My arguments are based on the old philosophical statement: "All I know, is that I know nothing", and it kinda rubs me the wrong way, when people stumble around, like an elephant in a fine china store, in the name of "truth" and "fact", when they obviously have no business doing so. And I'm aware of the mute and block button.. But the fine mechanics of online button-features wasn't exactly my point there. In short, we all have opinions and interpretations, but don't try to pass it off as any kind of omnius truth.

@N30F3N1X Well, when you boil the whole thing down to them having to cope with their own physical limitations, I can't really disagree. Most of us have to deal with that at one point or another.

@N30F3N1X No it doesn't. You simply agree with these things and found a professor who something similar. It changes absolutely nothing. It's true to YOU, not THE truth. Don't mix those two up.

@shiss27 What are you even talking about? You want to compare us to nature AND also label things as right or wrong. In nature, it's kill or be killed. Some animals eat their young. Praying mantis females decapitate and devour the males after fornication. Bonobo monkeys have sex with everybody. And I mean EVERYBODY. Humans and animals are non-relatable. We can't look to the animal kingdom for rules of right and wrong anymore than they can look to our. What's right and wrong? It's completely relative and an ever-changing concept.

@N30F3N1X The obvious? Well, perhaps if you're completely stripped of empathy and disregard the fact that none of you two have any idea what you're talking about. Simply calling people who are anything but bread'n butter-straight as having "emotional issues" and then even throwing in "weak" as some sort of low-blow, is - in my eyes at least - distasteful.